Demo Data from SIGIR 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Philipp Schneider 0004
dblp:121/6445-4
· DBLP profile ↗
4ranked-venue papers
3as first author
2since 2021 · last 2022
0000-0001-8858-428XORCID · verified
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Applied, interdisciplinary, general and emerging computing · 4 · 3 first-author · 2 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Interdisciplinary, comprehensive, and emerging computing
3 papers |
Bioinformatics and computational biology · 100% |
Topics — the 5 heaviest of 5, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Bioinformatics and computational biology › systems biology
metabolic network analysis |
1.1 | 2 | 2022 | CNApy: a CellNetAnalyzer GUI in Python for analyzing and designing metabolic networks · Bioinform. 2022 StrainDesign: a comprehensive Python package for computational design of metabolic networks · Bioinform. 2022 |
Bioinformatics and computational biology › systems biology › constraint-based modeling
constraint-based reconstruction and analysis |
0.6 | 1 | 2022 | CNApy: a CellNetAnalyzer GUI in Python for analyzing and designing metabolic networks · Bioinform. 2022 |
Bioinformatics and computational biology › synthetic biology › metabolic engineering
strain design |
0.6 | 1 | 2022 | StrainDesign: a comprehensive Python package for computational design of metabolic networks · Bioinform. 2022 |
Bioinformatics and computational biology › synthetic biology
metabolic engineering |
0.4 | 1 | 2019 | Characterizing and ranking computed metabolic engineering strategies · Bioinform. 2019 |
Bioinformatics and computational biology › systems biology › constraint-based modeling
constraint-based metabolic modeling |
0.3 | 2 | 2022 | StrainDesign: a comprehensive Python package for computational design of metabolic networks · Bioinform. 2022 Characterizing and ranking computed metabolic engineering strategies · Bioinform. 2019 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
robustknock · 0.6optknock · 0.6optcouple · 0.6minimal cut sets · 0.6constraint-based optimization · 0.6COBRA methods · 0.6thermodynamic analysis · 0.4multi-criteria ranking · 0.4
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2022 | StrainDesign: a comprehensive Python package for computational design of metabolic networksabstractSUMMARY: Various constraint-based optimization approaches have been developed for the computational analysis and design of metabolic networks. Herein, we present StrainDesign, a comprehensive Python package that builds upon the COBRApy toolbox and integrates the most popular metabolic design algorithms, including nested strain optimization methods such as OptKnock, RobustKnock and OptCouple as well as the more general minimal cut sets approach. The optimization approaches are embedded in individual modules, which can also be combined for setting up more elaborate strain design problems. Advanced features, such as the efficient integration of GPR rules and the possibility to consider gene and reaction additions or regulatory interventions, have been generalized and are available for all modules. The package uses state-of-the-art preprocessing methods, supports multiple solvers and provides a number of enhanced tools for analyzing computed intervention strategies including 2D and 3D plots of user-selected metabolic fluxes or yields. Furthermore, a user-friendly interface for the StrainDesign package has been implemented in the GUI-based metabolic modeling software CNApy. StrainDesign provides thus a unique and rich framework for computational strain design in Python, uniting many algorithmic developments in the field and allowing modular extension in the future. AVAILABILITY AND IMPLEMENTATION: The StrainDesign package can be retrieved from PyPi, Anaconda and GitHub (https://github.com/klamt-lab/straindesign) and is also part of the latest CNApy package. Philipp Schneider 0004, Pavlos Stephanos Bekiaris, Axel von Kamp, Steffen Klamt |
Bioinform. | 1 |
| 2022 | CNApy: a CellNetAnalyzer GUI in Python for analyzing and designing metabolic networksabstractSUMMARY: Constraint-based reconstruction and analysis (COBRA) is a widely used modeling framework for analyzing and designing metabolic networks. Here, we present CNApy, an open-source cross-platform desktop application written in Python, which offers a state-of-the-art graphical front-end for the intuitive analysis of metabolic networks with COBRA methods. While the basic look-and-feel of CNApy is similar to the user interface of the MATLAB toolbox CellNetAnalyzer, it provides various enhanced features by using components of the powerful Qt library. CNApy supports a number of standard and advanced COBRA techniques and further functionalities can be easily embedded in its GUI facilitating modular extension in the future. AVAILABILITY AND IMPLEMENTATION: CNApy can be installed via conda and its source code is freely available at https://github.com/cnapy-org/CNApy under the Apache 2 license. Sven Thiele, Axel von Kamp, Pavlos Stephanos Bekiaris, Philipp Schneider 0004, Steffen Klamt |
Bioinform. | 4 |
| 2020 | An extended and generalized framework for the calculation of metabolic intervention strategies based on minimal cut setsabstractThe concept of minimal cut sets (MCS) provides a flexible framework for analyzing properties of metabolic networks and for computing metabolic intervention strategies. In particular, it has been used to support the targeted design of microbial strains for bio-based production processes. Herein we present a number of major extensions that generalize the existing MCS approach and broaden its scope for applications in metabolic engineering. We first introduce a modified approach to integrate gene-protein-reaction associations (GPR) in the metabolic network structure for the computation of gene-based intervention strategies. In particular, we present a set of novel compression rules for GPR associations, which effectively speedup the computation of gene-based MCS by a factor of up to one order of magnitude. These rules are not specific for MCS and as well applicable to other computational strain design methods. Second, we enhance the MCS framework by allowing the definition of multiple target (undesired) and multiple protected (desired) regions. This enables precise tailoring of the metabolic solution space of the designed strain with unlimited flexibility. Together with further generalizations such as individual cost factors for each intervention, direct combinations of reaction/gene deletions and additions as well as the possibility to search for substrate co-feeding strategies, the scope of the MCS framework could be broadly extended. We demonstrate the applicability and performance benefits of the described developments by computing (gene-based) Escherichia coli strain designs for the bio-based production of 2,3-butanediol, a chemical, that has recently received much attention in the field of metabolic engineering. With our extended framework, we could identify promising strain designs that were formerly unpredictable, including those based on substrate co-feeding. Philipp Schneider 0004, Axel von Kamp, Steffen Klamt |
PLoS Comput. Biol. | 1 |
| 2019 | Characterizing and ranking computed metabolic engineering strategiesabstractMOTIVATION: The computer-aided design of metabolic intervention strategies has become a key component of an integrated metabolic engineering approach and a broad range of methods and algorithms has been developed for this task. Many of these algorithms enforce coupling of growth with product synthesis and may return thousands of possible intervention strategies from which the most suitable strategy must then be selected. RESULTS: This work focuses on how to evaluate and rank, in a meaningful way, a given pool of computed metabolic engineering strategies for growth-coupled product synthesis. Apart from straightforward criteria, such as a preferably small number of necessary interventions, a reasonable growth rate and a high product yield, we present several new criteria useful to pick the most suitable intervention strategy. Among others, we investigate the robustness of the intervention strategies by searching for metabolites that may disrupt growth coupling when accumulated or secreted and by checking whether the interventions interrupt pathways at their origin (preferable) or at downstream steps. We also assess thermodynamic properties of the pathway(s) favored by the intervention strategy. Furthermore, strategies that have a significant overlap with alternative solutions are ranked higher because they provide flexibility in implementation. We also introduce the notion of equivalence classes for grouping intervention strategies with identical solution spaces. Our ranking procedure involves in total ten criteria and we demonstrate its applicability by assessing knockout-based intervention strategies computed in a genome-scale model of E.coli for the growth-coupled synthesis of l-methionine and of the heterologous product 1,4-butanediol. AVAILABILITY AND IMPLEMENTATION: The MATLAB scripts that were used to characterize and rank the example intervention strategies are available at http://www2.mpi-magdeburg.mpg.de/projects/cna/etcdownloads.html. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Supplementary data are available at Bioinformatics online. Philipp Schneider 0004, Steffen Klamt |
Bioinform. | 1 |