Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Sofie Jansen

dblp:122/1512 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
2ranked-venue papers
0as first author
0since 2021 · last 2016
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 1Graphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 1

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Computer graphics and multimedia
1 paper
Audio and music processing · 100%
Interdisciplinary, comprehensive, and emerging computing
1 paper
Medical and health informatics · 100%

Topics — the 3 heaviest of 3, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Audio and music processing › speech enhancement › single-channel speech enhancement
single-channel noise reduction
0.212013
The Potential for Speech Intelligibility Improvement Using the Ideal Binary Mask and the Ideal Wiener Filter in Single Channel Noise Reduction Systems: Application to Auditory Prostheses · IEEE Trans. Speech Audio Process. 2013
Audio and music processing
speech enhancement
0.212013
The Potential for Speech Intelligibility Improvement Using the Ideal Binary Mask and the Ideal Wiener Filter in Single Channel Noise Reduction Systems: Application to Auditory Prostheses · IEEE Trans. Speech Audio Process. 2013
Medical and health informatics › neural prosthesis
auditory prostheses
0.012013
The Potential for Speech Intelligibility Improvement Using the Ideal Binary Mask and the Ideal Wiener Filter in Single Channel Noise Reduction Systems: Application to Auditory Prostheses · IEEE Trans. Speech Audio Process. 2013

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

time-frequency masking · 0.3bark-scale spectral resolution · 0.3
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2016 Estonian words in noise test for children (EWINc)
Anneli Veispak, Sofie Jansen, Pol Ghesquière, Jan Wouters
Speech Commun.2
2013 The Potential for Speech Intelligibility Improvement Using the Ideal Binary Mask and the Ideal Wiener Filter in Single Channel Noise Reduction Systems: Application to Auditory Prostheses
abstract
Whereas state-of-the-art single-channel noise reduction algorithms for auditory prostheses demonstrate an appreciable suppression of the noise and improved speech quality, they are unable, thus far, to improve the intelligibility of noise-degraded speech signals. Alternative approaches to speech enhancement using a binary time-frequency mask have demonstrated substantial intelligibility improvements in low signal-to-noise-ratio (SNR) conditions under ideal settings, making this a promising research direction for auditory prostheses. These approaches exploit the sparsity and disjoint-ness of speech spectra in their short-time-frequency representation to preserve only the target-dominant time-frequency regions in the processed output. State-of-the-art noise reduction algorithms in contrast are soft-decision approaches which weight each time-frequency region in proportion to the prevailing SNR. However, the potential for intelligibility improvement using these approaches has not been examined systematically vis-à-vis the binary mask alternative. This contribution compares the performance of an ideal soft-decision system, exemplified by the ideal Wiener filter (IWF), and the ideal binary mask (IBM) for single-channel speech enhancement for auditory prostheses. To obtain results relevant to this application area, a (relatively) low spectral resolution, modelled using the Bark-spectrum scale, is used for both the IWF and the IBM. This spectral resolution is comparable to that being used in commercial hearing instruments. The comparison is in terms of potential for intelligibility improvement and resulting signal quality. Intelligibility tests carried out under various noise conditions and SNRs show that the IWF leads to higher intelligibility scores than the IBM in low SNR conditions. Under non-ideal parameter estimates, it is demonstrated that the IWF approach is also much less sensitive to estimation errors. Quality-wise, a preference for the IWF exists. This was evaluated using a two-stage, pair-wise preference-rating test.
Nilesh Madhu, Ann Spriet, Sofie Jansen, Raphael Koning, Jan Wouters
IEEE Trans. Speech Audio Process.3