Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Jingyuan Song

dblp:123/7265 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
2ranked-venue papers
0as first author
0since 2021 · last 2018
0000-0003-2733-0416ORCID · corroborated

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Applied, interdisciplinary, general and emerging computing · 2

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Interdisciplinary, comprehensive, and emerging computing
1 paper
Bioinformatics and computational biology · 100%

Topics — the 3 heaviest of 3, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Bioinformatics and computational biology › sequence analysis › sequence assembly › genome assembly
de novo assembly
0.312018
IDP-denovo: de novo transcriptome assembly and isoform annotation by hybrid sequencing · Bioinform. 2018
Bioinformatics and computational biology › transcriptomics › transcript isoform analysis
isoform annotation
0.312018
IDP-denovo: de novo transcriptome assembly and isoform annotation by hybrid sequencing · Bioinform. 2018
Bioinformatics and computational biology › sequence analysis › sequence assembly
transcriptome assembly
0.312018
IDP-denovo: de novo transcriptome assembly and isoform annotation by hybrid sequencing · Bioinform. 2018

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

long-read and short-read integration · 0.3hybrid sequencing integration · 0.3
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2018 IDP-denovo: de novo transcriptome assembly and isoform annotation by hybrid sequencing
abstract
Motivation: In the past years, the long read (LR) sequencing technologies, such as Pacific Biosciences and Oxford Nanopore Technologies, have been demonstrated to substantially improve the quality of genome assembly and transcriptome characterization. Compared to the high cost of genome assembly by LR sequencing, it is more affordable to generate LRs for transcriptome characterization. That is, when informative transcriptome LR data are available without a high-quality genome, a method for de novo transcriptome assembly and annotation is of high demand. Results: Without a reference genome, IDP-denovo performs de novo transcriptome assembly, isoform annotation and quantification by integrating the strengths of LRs and short reads. Using the GM12878 human data as a gold standard, we demonstrated that IDP-denovo had superior sensitivity of transcript assembly and high accuracy of isoform annotation. In addition, IDP-denovo outputs two abundance indices to provide a comprehensive expression profile of genes/isoforms. IDP-denovo represents a robust approach for transcriptome assembly, isoform annotation and quantification for non-model organism studies. Applying IDP-denovo to a non-model organism, Dendrobium officinale, we discovered a number of novel genes and novel isoforms that were not reported by the existing annotation library. These results reveal the high diversity of gene isoforms in D.officinale, which was not reported in the existing annotation library. Availability and implementation: The dataset of Dendrobium officinale used/analyzed during the current study has been deposited in SRA, with accession code SRP094520. IDP-denovo is available for download at www.healthcare.uiowa.edu/labs/au/IDP-denovo/. Supplementary information: Supplementary data are available at Bioinformatics online.
Shuhua Fu, Yingke Ma, Zhichao Xu 0003, Jingyuan Song, Kin Fai Au
Bioinform.6
2011 PTIGS-IdIt, a system for species identification by DNA sequences of the psbA-trnH intergenic spacer region
abstract
BACKGROUND: DNA barcoding technology, which uses a short piece of DNA sequence to identify species, has wide ranges of applications. Until today, a universal DNA barcode marker for plants remains elusive. The rbcL and matK regions have been proposed as the "core barcode" for plants and the ITS2 and psbA-trnH intergenic spacer (PTIGS) regions were later added as supplemental barcodes. The use of PTIGS region as a supplemental barcode has been limited by the lack of computational tools that can handle significant insertions and deletions in the PTIGS sequences. Here, we compared the most commonly used alignment-based and alignment-free methods and developed a web server to allow the biologists to carry out PTIGS-based DNA barcoding analyses. RESULTS: First, we compared several alignment-based methods such as BLAST and those calculating P distance and Edit distance, alignment-free methods Di-Nucleotide Frequency Profile (DNFP) and their combinations. We found that the DNFP and Edit-distance methods increased the identification success rate to ~80%, 20% higher than the most commonly used BLAST method. Second, the combined methods showed overall better success rate and performance. Last, we have developed a web server that allows (1) retrieving various sub-regions and the consensus sequences of PTIGS, (2) annotating novel PTIGS sequences, (3) determining species identity by PTIGS sequences using eight methods, and (4) examining identification efficiency and performance of the eight methods for various taxonomy groups. CONCLUSIONS: The Edit distance and the DNFP methods have the highest discrimination powers. Hybrid methods can be used to achieve significant improvement in performance. These methods can be extended to applications using the core barcodes and the other supplemental DNA barcode ITS2. To our knowledge, the web server developed here is the only one that allows species determination based on PTIGS sequences. The web server can be accessed at http://psba-trnh-plantidit.dnsalias.org.
Xiaohui Pang, Jingyuan Song, Jianping Han, Xiaojun Guan, Huan Li 0001
BMC Bioinform.5