Demo Data from SIGIR 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Michael A. Schumann
dblp:124/0437
· DBLP profile ↗
1ranked-venue papers
1as first author
0since 2021 · last 2014
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Software engineering, systems software and programming languages · 1 · 1 first-author
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Software engineering, system software, and programming languages
1 paper |
Requirements engineering and software design · 100% | |
| Network and information security
1 paper |
Systems and software security · 100% |
Topics — the 1 heaviest of 2, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Requirements engineering and software design › business process modeling
workflow modeling |
0.2 | 1 | 2014 | Modeling Human-in-the-Loop Security Analysis and Decision-Making Processes · IEEE Trans. Software Eng. 2014 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
static and dynamic checking · 0.4statechart assertions · 0.4formal methods · 0.4
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2014 | Modeling Human-in-the-Loop Security Analysis and Decision-Making ProcessesabstractThis paper presents a novel application of computer-assisted formal methods for systematically specifying, documenting, statically and dynamically checking, and maintaining human-centered workflow processes. This approach provides for end-to-end verification and validation of process workflows, which is needed for process workflows that are intended for use in developing and maintaining high-integrity systems. We demonstrate the technical feasibility of our approach by applying it on the development of the US government's process workflow for implementing, certifying, and accrediting cross-domain computer security solutions. Our approach involves identifying human-in-the-loop decision points in the process activities and then modeling these via statechart assertions. We developed techniques to specify and enforce workflow hierarchies, which was a challenge due to the existence of concurrent activities within complex workflow processes. Some of the key advantages of our approach are: it results in development of a model that is executable, supporting both upfront and runtime checking of process-workflow requirements; aids comprehension and communication among stakeholders and process engineers; and provides for incorporating accountability and risk management into the engineering of process workflows. Michael A. Schumann, Doron Drusinsky, James Bret Michael, Duminda Wijesekera |
IEEE Trans. Software Eng. | 1 |