Demo Data from SIGIR 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
James Kirkpatrick
dblp:124/5973
· DBLP profile ↗
3ranked-venue papers
0as first author
1since 2021 · last 2022
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 3 · 1 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Artificial intelligence
3 papers |
Graph learning · 34% Deep learning architectures and training · 17% Reinforcement learning · 17% | |
| Interdisciplinary, comprehensive, and emerging computing
1 paper |
Bioinformatics and computational biology · 100% |
Topics — the 10 heaviest of 10, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Machine learning › Graph learning
graph neural network |
0.6 | 1 | 2022 | Simple GNN Regularisation for 3D Molecular Property Prediction and Beyond · ICLR 2022 |
Machine learning › Graph learning › molecular representation learning › molecular graph learning
molecular property prediction |
0.6 | 1 | 2022 | Simple GNN Regularisation for 3D Molecular Property Prediction and Beyond · ICLR 2022 |
Machine learning › Deep learning architectures and training
regularization |
0.6 | 1 | 2022 | Simple GNN Regularisation for 3D Molecular Property Prediction and Beyond · ICLR 2022 |
Bioinformatics and computational biology
molecular property prediction |
0.6 | 1 | 2022 | Simple GNN Regularisation for 3D Molecular Property Prediction and Beyond · ICLR 2022 |
Machine learning › Reinforcement learning
multi-task reinforcement learning |
0.3 | 1 | 2017 | Distral: Robust multitask reinforcement learning · NIPS 2017 |
Machine learning › Learning paradigms › multi-task learning
multi-task transfer learning |
0.3 | 1 | 2017 | Distral: Robust multitask reinforcement learning · NIPS 2017 |
Machine learning › Reinforcement learning › transfer learning in reinforcement learning › policy transfer
policy distillation |
0.3 | 1 | 2017 | Distral: Robust multitask reinforcement learning · NIPS 2017 |
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning › statistical inference › bayesian inference
bayesian nonparametric model |
0.2 | 1 | 2016 | The Forget-me-not Process · NIPS 2016 |
Machine learning › Time series and sequential data › temporal sequence modeling
online sequence prediction |
0.2 | 1 | 2016 | The Forget-me-not Process · NIPS 2016 |
Robotics › Robot manipulation
task segmentation |
0.2 | 1 | 2016 | The Forget-me-not Process · NIPS 2016 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
regularization · 1.1graph neural network · 1.1shared policy · 0.3distillation · 0.3regret analysis · 0.2bayesian inference · 0.2
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2022 | Simple GNN Regularisation for 3D Molecular Property Prediction and Beyond
Jonathan Godwin, Michael Schaarschmidt, Alexander L. Gaunt, Alvaro Sanchez-Gonzalez, Yulia Rubanova, Petar Velickovic, James Kirkpatrick, Peter W. Battaglia |
ICLR | 7 |
| 2017 | Distral: Robust multitask reinforcement learningabstractMost deep reinforcement learning algorithms are data inefficient in complex and rich environments, limiting their applicability to many scenarios. One direction for improving data efficiency is multitask learning with shared neural network parameters, where efficiency may be improved through transfer across related tasks. In practice, however, this is not usually observed, because gradients from different tasks can interfere negatively, making learning unstable and sometimes even less data efficient. Another issue is the different reward schemes between tasks, which can easily lead to one task dominating the learning of a shared model. We propose a new approach for joint training of multiple tasks, which we refer to as Distral (DIStill & TRAnsfer Learning). Instead of sharing parameters between the different workers, we propose to share a distilled policy that captures common behaviour across tasks. Each worker is trained to solve its own task while constrained to stay close to the shared policy, while the shared policy is trained by distillation to be the centroid of all task policies. Both aspects of the learning process are derived by optimizing a joint objective function. We show that our approach supports efficient transfer on complex 3D environments, outperforming several related methods. Moreover, the proposed learning process is more robust and more stable---attributes that are critical in deep reinforcement learning. Yee Whye Teh, Victor Bapst, Wojciech Czarnecki 0001, John Quan, James Kirkpatrick, Raia Hadsell, Nicolas Heess, Razvan Pascanu |
NIPS | 5 |
| 2016 | The Forget-me-not ProcessabstractWe introduce the Forget-me-not Process, an efficient, non-parametric meta-algorithm for online probabilistic sequence prediction for piecewise stationary, repeating sources. Our method works by taking a Bayesian approach to partition a stream of data into postulated task-specific segments, while simultaneously building a model for each task. We provide regret guarantees with respect to piecewise stationary data sources under the logarithmic loss, and validate the method empirically across a range of sequence prediction and task identification problems. Kieran Milan, Joel Veness, James Kirkpatrick, Michael H. Bowling, Anna Koop, Demis Hassabis |
NIPS | 3 |