Demo Data from SIGIR 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Sabrina Sobieraj
dblp:124/6725
· DBLP profile ↗
2ranked-venue papers
1as first author
1since 2021 · last 2023
—ORCID · unresolved
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Human-computer interaction and ubiquitous computing · 2 · 1 first-author · 1 since 2021Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 1
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Human-computer interaction and pervasive computing
2 papers |
Wearable and physiological sensing · 64% Usability and user experience research · 19% Human-robot interaction · 16% |
Topics — the 3 heaviest of 3, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Wearable and physiological sensing › wearable display
smart glasses |
0.7 | 1 | 2023 | Can smart glasses change how people evaluate healthcare professionals? A mixed-method approach to using smart glasses in hospitals · Int. J. Hum. Comput. Stud. 2023 |
Usability and user experience research
technology acceptance |
0.2 | 1 | 2023 | Can smart glasses change how people evaluate healthcare professionals? A mixed-method approach to using smart glasses in hospitals · Int. J. Hum. Comput. Stud. 2023 |
Human-robot interaction › affective interaction
empathy toward robots |
0.2 | 1 | 2013 | Neural correlates of empathy towards robots · HRI 2013 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
mixed-method experiment · 0.7focus groups · 0.7
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023 | Can smart glasses change how people evaluate healthcare professionals? A mixed-method approach to using smart glasses in hospitalsabstractRecently, the use of smart glasses in healthcare professions has been increasingly discussed, but unlike in established application contexts such as logistics, healthcare professions depend on trusting interactions with patients. Research has mostly focused on the usefulness and usability of smart glasses and neglects the perspective of the interacting partner. In order to examine how patients perceive and evaluate the wearing and use of smart glasses by healthcare professionals, we used a mixed methods approach. First, we conducted an exploratory 7(glasses design) x2(sex) x2(social status) online experiment (N = 415) followed by a focus group study. While the experiment showed that the glasses design is most decisive to impression formation, the focus group study revealed that the smart glasses evoked equal amounts of confusion and curiosity among the observers. It seems that smart glasses are rather perceived as something attached to the body rather than as part of the body. Sabrina Sobieraj, Sabrina C. Eimler, Gerhard Rinkenauer |
Int. J. Hum. Comput. Stud. | 1 |
| 2013 | Neural correlates of empathy towards robots
Astrid M. Rosenthal-von der Pütten, Frank P. Schulte, Sabrina C. Eimler, Laura Kunold, Sabrina Sobieraj, Stefan Maderwald, Nicole C. Krämer, Matthias Brand |
HRI | 5 |