Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Sabrina Sobieraj

dblp:124/6725 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
2ranked-venue papers
1as first author
1since 2021 · last 2023
—ORCID · unresolved

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Human-computer interaction and ubiquitous computing · 2 · 1 first-author · 1 since 2021Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 1

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Human-computer interaction and pervasive computing
2 papers
Wearable and physiological sensing · 64% Usability and user experience research · 19% Human-robot interaction · 16%

Topics — the 3 heaviest of 3, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Wearable and physiological sensing › wearable display
smart glasses
0.712023
Can smart glasses change how people evaluate healthcare professionals? A mixed-method approach to using smart glasses in hospitals · Int. J. Hum. Comput. Stud. 2023
Usability and user experience research
technology acceptance
0.212023
Can smart glasses change how people evaluate healthcare professionals? A mixed-method approach to using smart glasses in hospitals · Int. J. Hum. Comput. Stud. 2023
Human-robot interaction › affective interaction
empathy toward robots
0.212013
Neural correlates of empathy towards robots · HRI 2013

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

mixed-method experiment · 0.7focus groups · 0.7
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2023 Can smart glasses change how people evaluate healthcare professionals? A mixed-method approach to using smart glasses in hospitals
abstract
Recently, the use of smart glasses in healthcare professions has been increasingly discussed, but unlike in established application contexts such as logistics, healthcare professions depend on trusting interactions with patients. Research has mostly focused on the usefulness and usability of smart glasses and neglects the perspective of the interacting partner. In order to examine how patients perceive and evaluate the wearing and use of smart glasses by healthcare professionals, we used a mixed methods approach. First, we conducted an exploratory 7(glasses design) x2(sex) x2(social status) online experiment (N = 415) followed by a focus group study. While the experiment showed that the glasses design is most decisive to impression formation, the focus group study revealed that the smart glasses evoked equal amounts of confusion and curiosity among the observers. It seems that smart glasses are rather perceived as something attached to the body rather than as part of the body.
Sabrina Sobieraj, Sabrina C. Eimler, Gerhard Rinkenauer
Int. J. Hum. Comput. Stud.1
2013 Neural correlates of empathy towards robots
Astrid M. Rosenthal-von der Pütten, Frank P. Schulte, Sabrina C. Eimler, Laura Kunold, Sabrina Sobieraj, Stefan Maderwald, Nicole C. Krämer, Matthias Brand
HRI5