Demo Data from SIGIR 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Antti Koskela
dblp:124/9273
· DBLP profile ↗
11ranked-venue papers
6as first author
9since 2021 · last 2025
0000-0001-7371-2488ORCID · corroborated
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 9 · 6 first-author · 7 since 2021Security and privacy · 1 · 1 since 2021Applied, interdisciplinary, general and emerging computing · 1 · 1 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Network and information security
6 papers |
Privacy and data protection · 100% | |
| Artificial intelligence
2 papers |
Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning · 60% Trustworthy machine learning · 40% |
Topics — the 13 heaviest of 13, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Privacy and data protection
differential privacy |
4.1 | 6 | 2025 | Convex Approximation of Two-Layer ReLU Networks for Hidden State Differential Privacy · NeurIPS 2025 Privacy Profiles for Private Selection · ICML 2024 Improving the Privacy and Practicality of Objective Perturbation for Differentially Private Linear Learners · NeurIPS 2023 |
Privacy and data protection › differential privacy › differentially private learning
differentially private training |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Convex Approximation of Two-Layer ReLU Networks for Hidden State Differential Privacy · NeurIPS 2025 |
Privacy and data protection › differential privacy › privacy mechanism design
private selection |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | Privacy Profiles for Private Selection · ICML 2024 |
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning › privacy
privacy-preserving machine learning |
0.7 | 1 | 2023 | Practical Differentially Private Hyperparameter Tuning with Subsampling · NeurIPS 2023 |
Privacy and data protection › differential privacy
differentially private learning |
0.7 | 1 | 2023 | Improving the Privacy and Practicality of Objective Perturbation for Differentially Private Linear Learners · NeurIPS 2023 |
Privacy and data protection › differential privacy › differentially private deep learning
DP-SGD |
0.7 | 1 | 2023 | Improving the Privacy and Practicality of Objective Perturbation for Differentially Private Linear Learners · NeurIPS 2023 |
Privacy and data protection › differential privacy › privacy accounting
gaussian differential privacy |
0.7 | 1 | 2023 | Individual Privacy Accounting with Gaussian Differential Privacy · ICLR 2023 |
Privacy and data protection › differential privacy
hyperparameter tuning |
0.7 | 1 | 2023 | Practical Differentially Private Hyperparameter Tuning with Subsampling · NeurIPS 2023 |
Privacy and data protection › differential privacy › privacy mechanism design
objective perturbation |
0.7 | 1 | 2023 | Improving the Privacy and Practicality of Objective Perturbation for Differentially Private Linear Learners · NeurIPS 2023 |
Privacy and data protection › differential privacy
privacy accounting |
0.7 | 1 | 2023 | Individual Privacy Accounting with Gaussian Differential Privacy · ICLR 2023 |
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning › statistical inference
bayesian inference |
0.5 | 1 | 2021 | Differentially Private Bayesian Inference for Generalized Linear Models · ICML 2021 |
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning › statistical inference › regression
generalized linear model |
0.5 | 1 | 2021 | Differentially Private Bayesian Inference for Generalized Linear Models · ICML 2021 |
Privacy and data protection › differential privacy › differentially private learning
differentially private bayesian inference |
0.5 | 1 | 2021 | Differentially Private Bayesian Inference for Generalized Linear Models · ICML 2021 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
random search · 1.3stochastic approximation · 0.9noisy cyclic mini-batch gradient descent · 0.9convex optimization · 0.9DP-SGD · 0.9sparse vector · 0.8report noisy max · 0.8f-DP · 0.8Rényi DP · 0.8subsampling · 0.7rényi differential privacy · 0.7gaussian differential privacy · 0.7poisson regression · 0.5logistic regression · 0.5differential privacy · 0.5bayesian inference · 0.5
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | Private Spectral Clustering Over Binary Stochastic Block ModelsabstractWe investigate privacy-preserving spectral clustering for community detection within stochastic block models (SBMs). Specifically, we focus on edge differential privacy (DP) and propose private algorithms for community recovery. Our work explores the fundamental trade-offs between the privacy budget and the accurate recovery of community labels. Furthermore, we establish information-theoretic conditions that guarantee the accuracy of our methods, providing theoretical assurances for successful community recovery under edge DP. Mohamed Seif, Antti Koskela, Andrea J. Goldsmith |
ISIT | 2 |
| 2025 | Convex Approximation of Two-Layer ReLU Networks for Hidden State Differential PrivacyabstractThe hidden state threat model of differential privacy (DP) assumes that the adversary has access only to the final trained machine learning (ML) model, without seeing intermediate states during training. However, the current privacy analyses under this model are restricted to convex optimization problems, reducing their applicability to multi-layer neural networks, which are essential in modern deep learning applications. Notably, the most successful applications of the hidden state privacy analyses in classification tasks have only been for logistic regression models. We demonstrate that it is possible to privately train convex problems with privacy-utility trade-offs comparable to those of 2-layer ReLU networks trained with DP stochastic gradient descent (DP-SGD). This is achieved through a stochastic approximation of a dual formulation of the ReLU minimization problem, resulting in a strongly convex problem. This enables the use of existing hidden state privacy analyses and provides accurate privacy bounds also for the noisy cyclic mini-batch gradient descent (NoisyCGD) method with fixed disjoint mini-batches. Empirical results on benchmark classification tasks demonstrate that NoisyCGD can achieve privacy-utility trade-offs on par with DP-SGD applied to 2-layer ReLU networks. Rob Romijnders, Antti Koskela |
NeurIPS | 2 |
| 2025 | Communication Efficient Differentially Private Federated Learning Using Second Order InformationabstractTraining machine learning models with differential privacy (DP) is commonly done using first-order methods such as DP-SGD. In the non-private setting, second-order methods try to mitigate the slow convergence of first-order methods. The DP methods that use second-order information still provide faster convergence, however the existing methods cannot be easily turned into federated learning (FL) algorithms without an excessive communication cost required by the exchange of the Hessian or feature covariance information between the nodes and the server. In this paper we propose DP-FedNew, a DP method for FL that uses second-order information and results in per-iteration communication cost similar to first-order methods such as DP Federated Averaging. Mounssif Krouka, Antti Koskela, Tejas D. Kulkarni |
Proc. Priv. Enhancing Technol. | 2 |
| 2024 | Privacy Profiles for Private SelectionabstractPrivate selection mechanisms (e.g., Report Noisy Max, Sparse Vector) are fundamental primitives of differentially private (DP) data analysis with wide applications to private query release, voting, and hyperparameter tuning. Recent work (Liu and Talwar, 2019; Papernot and Steinke, 2022) has made significant progress in both generalizing private selection mechanisms and tightening their privacy analysis using modern numerical privacy accounting tools, e.g., Rényi DP. But Rényi DP is known to be lossy when $(\epsilon,\delta)$-DP is ultimately needed, and there is a trend to close the gap by directly handling privacy profiles, i.e., $\delta$ as a function of $\epsilon$ or its equivalent dual form known as $f$-DPs. In this paper, we work out an easy-to-use recipe that bounds the privacy profiles of ReportNoisyMax and PrivateTuning using the privacy profiles of the base algorithms they corral. Numerically, our approach improves over the RDP-based accounting in all regimes of interest and leads to substantial benefits in end-to-end private learning experiments. Our analysis also suggests new distributions, e.g., binomial distribution for randomizing the number of rounds that leads to more substantial improvements in certain regimes. Antti Koskela, Rachel Redberg, Yu-Xiang Wang 0003 |
ICML | 1 |
| 2023 | Individual Privacy Accounting with Gaussian Differential Privacy
Antti Koskela, Marlon Tobaben, Antti Honkela |
ICLR | 1 |
| 2023 | Practical Differentially Private Hyperparameter Tuning with SubsamplingabstractTuning the hyperparameters of differentially private (DP) machine learning (ML) algorithms often requires use of sensitive data and this may leak private information via hyperparameter values. Recently, Papernot and Steinke (2022) proposed a certain class of DP hyperparameter tuning algorithms, where the number of random search samples is randomized. Commonly, these algorithms still considerably increase the DP privacy parameter $\varepsilon$ over non-tuned DP ML model training and can be computationally heavy as evaluating each hyperparameter candidate requires a new training run. We focus on lowering both the DP bounds and the compute cost of these methods by using only a random subset of the sensitive data for the hyperparameter tuning and by appropriately extrapolating the optimal values to a larger dataset. We carry out a Rényi differential privacy analysis for the proposed method and experimentally show that it consistently leads to better privacy-utility trade-off than the baseline method by Papernot and Steinke. Antti Koskela, Tejas D. Kulkarni |
NeurIPS | 1 |
| 2023 | Improving the Privacy and Practicality of Objective Perturbation for Differentially Private Linear LearnersabstractIn the arena of privacy-preserving machine learning, differentially private stochastic gradient descent (DP-SGD) has outstripped the objective perturbation mechanism in popularity and interest. Though unrivaled in versatility, DP-SGD requires a non-trivial privacy overhead (for privately tuning the model’s hyperparameters) and a computational complexity which might be extravagant for simple models such as linear and logistic regression. This paper revamps the objective perturbation mechanism with tighter privacy analyses and new computational tools that boost it to perform competitively with DP-SGD on unconstrained convex generalized linear problems. Rachel Redberg, Antti Koskela, Yu-Xiang Wang 0003 |
NeurIPS | 2 |
| 2021 | Tight Differential Privacy for Discrete-Valued Mechanisms and for the Subsampled Gaussian Mechanism Using FFTabstractWe propose a numerical accountant for evaluating the tight (ε,δ)-privacy loss for algorithms with discrete one dimensional output. The method is based on the privacy loss distribution formalism and it uses the recently introduced fast Fourier transform based accounting technique. We carry out an error analysis of the method in terms of moment bounds of the privacy loss distribution which leads to rigorous lower and upper bounds for the true (ε,δ)-values. As an application, we present a novel approach to accurate privacy accounting of the subsampled Gaussian mechanism. This completes the previously proposed analysis by giving strict lower and upper bounds for the privacy parameters. We demonstrate the performance of the accountant on the binomial mechanism and show that our approach allows decreasing noise variance up to 75 percent at equal privacy compared to existing bounds in the literature. We also illustrate how to compute tight bounds for the exponential mechanism applied to counting queries. Antti Koskela, Joonas Jälkö, Lukas Prediger, Antti Honkela |
AISTATS | 1 |
| 2021 | Differentially Private Bayesian Inference for Generalized Linear ModelsabstractGeneralized linear models (GLMs) such as logistic regression are among the most widely used arms in data analyst’s repertoire and often used on sensitive datasets. A large body of prior works that investigate GLMs under differential privacy (DP) constraints provide only private point estimates of the regression coefficients, and are not able to quantify parameter uncertainty. In this work, with logistic and Poisson regression as running examples, we introduce a generic noise-aware DP Bayesian inference method for a GLM at hand, given a noisy sum of summary statistics. Quantifying uncertainty allows us to determine which of the regression coefficients are statistically significantly different from zero. We provide a previously unknown tight privacy analysis and experimentally demonstrate that the posteriors obtained from our model, while adhering to strong privacy guarantees, are close to the non-private posteriors. Tejas D. Kulkarni, Joonas Jälkö, Antti Koskela, Samuel Kaski, Antti Honkela |
ICML | 3 |
| 2020 | Learning Rate Adaptation for Differentially Private LearningabstractDifferentially private learning has recently emerged as the leading approach for privacy-preserving machine learning. Differential privacy can complicate learning procedures because each access to the data needs to be carefully designed and carries a privacy cost. For example, standard parameter tuning with a validation set cannot be easily applied. In this paper, we propose a differentially private algorithm for the adaptation of the learning rate for differentially private stochastic gradient descent (SGD) that avoids the need for validation set use. The idea for the adaptiveness comes from the technique of extrapolation in numerical analysis: to get an estimate for the error against the gradient flow we compare the result obtained by one full step and two half-steps. We prove the privacy of the method using the moments accountant mechanism. This allows us to compute tight privacy bounds. Empirically we show that our method is competitive with manually tuned commonly used optimisation methods for training deep neural networks and differentially private variational inference. Antti Koskela, Antti Honkela |
AISTATS | 1 |
| 2020 | Computing Tight Differential Privacy Guarantees Using FFTabstractDifferentially private (DP) machine learning has recently become popular. The privacy loss of DP algorithms is commonly reported using (e.d)-DP. In this paper, we propose a numerical accountant for evaluating the privacy loss for algorithms with continuous one dimensional output. This accountant can be applied to the subsampled multidimensional Gaussian mechanism which underlies the popular DP stochastic gradient descent. The proposed method is based on a numerical approximation of an integral formula which gives the exact (e.d)-values. The approximation is carried out by discretising the integral and by evaluating discrete convolutions using the fast Fourier transform algorithm. We give theoretical error bounds which show the convergence of the approximation and guarantee its accuracy to an arbitrary degree. We give both theoretical error bounds and numerical error estimates for the approximation. Experimental comparisons with state-of-the-art techniques demonstrate significant improvements in bound tightness and/or computation time. Antti Koskela, Joonas Jälkö, Antti Honkela |
AISTATS | 1 |