Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

William Sollfrey

dblp:125/1189 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
3ranked-venue papers
1as first author
0since 2021 · last 1989
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Theory of computation · 2 · 1 first-authorComputer networks · 1

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Computer networks
3 papers
Physical-layer communications · 98% Wireless sensing and localization · 2%
Theoretical computer science
1 paper
Information theory · 100%

Topics — the 10 heaviest of 10, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Physical-layer communications › modulation
amplitude modulation
0.011989
A comparison of SSB-SC and conventional AM under a peak power limitation · IEEE Trans. Commun. 1989
Physical-layer communications
modulation
0.011989
A comparison of SSB-SC and conventional AM under a peak power limitation · IEEE Trans. Commun. 1989
Physical-layer communications › power constraint
peak power constraint
0.011989
A comparison of SSB-SC and conventional AM under a peak power limitation · IEEE Trans. Commun. 1989
Physical-layer communications › hardware impairments
hard-limiting
0.011969
Hard limiting of three and four sinusoidal signals · IEEE Trans. Inf. Theory 1969
Physical-layer communications › hardware impairments
nonlinear distortion
0.011969
Hard limiting of three and four sinusoidal signals · IEEE Trans. Inf. Theory 1969
Physical-layer communications
signal processing for communications
0.011969
Hard limiting of three and four sinusoidal signals · IEEE Trans. Inf. Theory 1969
Physical-layer communications › signal processing for communications › statistical signal processing › estimation theory
doppler frequency estimation
0.011968
A comparison of average-likelihood and maximum-likelihood ratio tests for detecting radar targets of unknown Doppler frequency · IEEE Trans. Inf. Theory 1968
Wireless sensing and localization › radar signal processing
radar detection
0.011968
A comparison of average-likelihood and maximum-likelihood ratio tests for detecting radar targets of unknown Doppler frequency · IEEE Trans. Inf. Theory 1968
Information theory
hypothesis testing
0.011968
A comparison of average-likelihood and maximum-likelihood ratio tests for detecting radar targets of unknown Doppler frequency · IEEE Trans. Inf. Theory 1968
Information theory › hypothesis testing
likelihood ratio test
0.011968
A comparison of average-likelihood and maximum-likelihood ratio tests for detecting radar targets of unknown Doppler frequency · IEEE Trans. Inf. Theory 1968

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

waveform analysis · 0.0pareto distribution analysis · 0.0average-likelihood ratio · 0.0analytic derivation · 0.0
YearPublicationVenuePosition
1989 A comparison of SSB-SC and conventional AM under a peak power limitation
abstract
Single-sideband (SSB) and AM signals are analyzed using a waveform that can be varied in shape from a spike through a sine wave to a square wave by varying a parameter. The average sideband powers and the peak envelope powers are then calculated and compared. It is shown that the ratio of average sideband power to peak envelope power for AM is more favorable than that for SSB for 'squarish' modulating signals. However, the ratio for SSB is about 9 dB higher than it is for AM for modulating signals ranging in shape from a sine wave to a spike.>
Edward Bedrosian, William Sollfrey
IEEE Trans. Commun.2
1969 Hard limiting of three and four sinusoidal signals
abstract
An analysis of the effect of hard limiting on a sum of three or four sinusoidal signals has been performed. Analytic expressions are obtained for the output amplitudes for three input signals, two of equal amplitude, and for four signals, amplitudes equal in pairs. The results are compared with previous investigations that employ digital computer simulation, and excellent agreement is obtained. The signal suppression is investigated, and the "negative suppression" effect found numerically by other authors is shown to arise from logarithmic terms in the dependence of the output amplitude on the input signal amplitude ratio. These results should aid in understanding the interactions that occur when a limiting communications receiver is addressed by several signals.
William Sollfrey
IEEE Trans. Inf. Theory1
1968 A comparison of average-likelihood and maximum-likelihood ratio tests for detecting radar targets of unknown Doppler frequency
abstract
In a coherent search rader, the pulse-to-pulse Doppler shift of a signal is generally not known a priori. Given the distribution of this parameter, the best test variable for detection is the average of the likelihood ratio with respect to target Doppler frequency. Most coherent search radars employ a maximum-likelihood ratio detector, that is, a bank of independent Doppler filters, for detection. The average-likelihood and maximum-likelihood tests are compared here for a target with the Rayleigh amplitude distribution. It is shown that, over a wide range of detection and false-alarm probabilities, the performances of the two tests do not differ significantly. For this target model, the likelihood ratio has the Pareto distribution, which arises in some statistical problems in economics. The new results obtained here for the distribution of the sum of two or more Pareto-distributed variables are of considerable general interest.
Lawrence E. Brennan, Irving S. Reed, William Sollfrey
IEEE Trans. Inf. Theory3