Demo Data from SIGIR 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
William Sollfrey
dblp:125/1189
· DBLP profile ↗
3ranked-venue papers
1as first author
0since 2021 · last 1989
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Theory of computation · 2 · 1 first-authorComputer networks · 1
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Computer networks
3 papers |
Physical-layer communications · 98% Wireless sensing and localization · 2% | |
| Theoretical computer science
1 paper |
Information theory · 100% |
Topics — the 10 heaviest of 10, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Physical-layer communications › modulation
amplitude modulation |
0.0 | 1 | 1989 | A comparison of SSB-SC and conventional AM under a peak power limitation · IEEE Trans. Commun. 1989 |
Physical-layer communications
modulation |
0.0 | 1 | 1989 | A comparison of SSB-SC and conventional AM under a peak power limitation · IEEE Trans. Commun. 1989 |
Physical-layer communications › power constraint
peak power constraint |
0.0 | 1 | 1989 | A comparison of SSB-SC and conventional AM under a peak power limitation · IEEE Trans. Commun. 1989 |
Physical-layer communications › hardware impairments
hard-limiting |
0.0 | 1 | 1969 | Hard limiting of three and four sinusoidal signals · IEEE Trans. Inf. Theory 1969 |
Physical-layer communications › hardware impairments
nonlinear distortion |
0.0 | 1 | 1969 | Hard limiting of three and four sinusoidal signals · IEEE Trans. Inf. Theory 1969 |
Physical-layer communications
signal processing for communications |
0.0 | 1 | 1969 | Hard limiting of three and four sinusoidal signals · IEEE Trans. Inf. Theory 1969 |
Physical-layer communications › signal processing for communications › statistical signal processing › estimation theory
doppler frequency estimation |
0.0 | 1 | 1968 | A comparison of average-likelihood and maximum-likelihood ratio tests for detecting radar targets of unknown Doppler frequency · IEEE Trans. Inf. Theory 1968 |
Wireless sensing and localization › radar signal processing
radar detection |
0.0 | 1 | 1968 | A comparison of average-likelihood and maximum-likelihood ratio tests for detecting radar targets of unknown Doppler frequency · IEEE Trans. Inf. Theory 1968 |
Information theory
hypothesis testing |
0.0 | 1 | 1968 | A comparison of average-likelihood and maximum-likelihood ratio tests for detecting radar targets of unknown Doppler frequency · IEEE Trans. Inf. Theory 1968 |
Information theory › hypothesis testing
likelihood ratio test |
0.0 | 1 | 1968 | A comparison of average-likelihood and maximum-likelihood ratio tests for detecting radar targets of unknown Doppler frequency · IEEE Trans. Inf. Theory 1968 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
waveform analysis · 0.0pareto distribution analysis · 0.0average-likelihood ratio · 0.0analytic derivation · 0.0
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1989 | A comparison of SSB-SC and conventional AM under a peak power limitationabstractSingle-sideband (SSB) and AM signals are analyzed using a waveform that can be varied in shape from a spike through a sine wave to a square wave by varying a parameter. The average sideband powers and the peak envelope powers are then calculated and compared. It is shown that the ratio of average sideband power to peak envelope power for AM is more favorable than that for SSB for 'squarish' modulating signals. However, the ratio for SSB is about 9 dB higher than it is for AM for modulating signals ranging in shape from a sine wave to a spike.> Edward Bedrosian, William Sollfrey |
IEEE Trans. Commun. | 2 |
| 1969 | Hard limiting of three and four sinusoidal signalsabstractAn analysis of the effect of hard limiting on a sum of three or four sinusoidal signals has been performed. Analytic expressions are obtained for the output amplitudes for three input signals, two of equal amplitude, and for four signals, amplitudes equal in pairs. The results are compared with previous investigations that employ digital computer simulation, and excellent agreement is obtained. The signal suppression is investigated, and the "negative suppression" effect found numerically by other authors is shown to arise from logarithmic terms in the dependence of the output amplitude on the input signal amplitude ratio. These results should aid in understanding the interactions that occur when a limiting communications receiver is addressed by several signals. William Sollfrey |
IEEE Trans. Inf. Theory | 1 |
| 1968 | A comparison of average-likelihood and maximum-likelihood ratio tests for detecting radar targets of unknown Doppler frequencyabstractIn a coherent search rader, the pulse-to-pulse Doppler shift of a signal is generally not known a priori. Given the distribution of this parameter, the best test variable for detection is the average of the likelihood ratio with respect to target Doppler frequency. Most coherent search radars employ a maximum-likelihood ratio detector, that is, a bank of independent Doppler filters, for detection. The average-likelihood and maximum-likelihood tests are compared here for a target with the Rayleigh amplitude distribution. It is shown that, over a wide range of detection and false-alarm probabilities, the performances of the two tests do not differ significantly. For this target model, the likelihood ratio has the Pareto distribution, which arises in some statistical problems in economics. The new results obtained here for the distribution of the sum of two or more Pareto-distributed variables are of considerable general interest. Lawrence E. Brennan, Irving S. Reed, William Sollfrey |
IEEE Trans. Inf. Theory | 3 |