Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page
Demo Data from SIGIR 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert

Megan C. Hasler

dblp:126/7268 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
1ranked-venue papers
0as first author
0since 2021 · last 2013
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Human-computer interaction and ubiquitous computing · 1

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Human-computer interaction and pervasive computing
1 paper
Usability and user experience research · 77% Design research and methods · 23%
Computer graphics and multimedia
1 paper
Visualization and visual analytics · 100%

Topics — the 2 heaviest of 3, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Visualization and visual analytics › geospatial visualization
schematic metro maps		 0.212013
Objective versus subjective measures of Paris Metro map usability: Investigating traditional octolinear versus all-curves schematics · Int. J. Hum. Comput. Stud. 2013
Usability and user experience research › usability evaluation
subjective vs objective usability measures		 0.212013
Objective versus subjective measures of Paris Metro map usability: Investigating traditional octolinear versus all-curves schematics · Int. J. Hum. Comput. Stud. 2013
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2013 Objective versus subjective measures of Paris Metro map usability: Investigating traditional octolinear versus all-curves schematics
Maxwell J. Roberts, Elizabeth J. Newton, Fabio D. Lagattolla, Simon Hughes, Megan C. Hasler
 Int. J. Hum. Comput. Stud.5