Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Kays Fattal

dblp:129/1985 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
1ranked-venue papers
0as first author
0since 2021 · last 2013
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Human-computer interaction and ubiquitous computing · 1

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Human-computer interaction and pervasive computing
1 paper
Interaction techniques and input · 77% Accessibility and assistive technology · 23%

Topics — the 2 heaviest of 2, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Interaction techniques and input › target selection › pointing
pointing and dragging
0.212013
Age-related differences in performance with touchscreens compared to traditional mouse input · CHI 2013
Accessibility and assistive technology
older adults
0.012013
Age-related differences in performance with touchscreens compared to traditional mouse input · CHI 2013

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

psychomotor performance comparison · 0.2controlled lab study · 0.2
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2013 Age-related differences in performance with touchscreens compared to traditional mouse input
abstract
Despite the apparent popularity of touchscreens for older adults, little is known about the psychomotor performance of these devices. We compared performance between older adults and younger adults on four desktop and touchscreen tasks: pointing, dragging, crossing and steering. On the touchscreen, we also examined pinch-to-zoom. Our results show that while older adults were significantly slower than younger adults in general, the touchscreen reduced this performance gap relative to the desktop and mouse. Indeed, the touchscreen resulted in a significant movement time reduction of 35% over the mouse for older adults, compared to only 16% for younger adults. Error rates also decreased.
Leah Findlater, Jon Froehlich, Kays Fattal, Jacob O. Wobbrock, Tanya Dastyar
CHI3