Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Michael L. Boninger

dblp:129/4584 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
3ranked-venue papers
0as first author
1since 2021 · last 2025
0000-0001-6966-919XORCID · corroborated

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Applied, interdisciplinary, general and emerging computing · 2Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 1 · 1 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Artificial intelligence
1 paper
Deep learning architectures and training · 44% Language models and text generation · 44% Trustworthy machine learning · 13%
Interdisciplinary, comprehensive, and emerging computing
1 paper
Bioinformatics and computational biology · 100%

Topics — the 6 heaviest of 8, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Natural language and speech › Language models and text generation › neural language model
autoregressive transformer
0.912025
A Generalist Intracortical Motor Decoder · NeurIPS 2025
Machine learning › Deep learning architectures and training
foundation model
0.912025
A Generalist Intracortical Motor Decoder · NeurIPS 2025
Bioinformatics and computational biology › computational neuroscience
neural decoding
0.912025
A Generalist Intracortical Motor Decoder · NeurIPS 2025
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning › robustness
distribution shift
0.312025
A Generalist Intracortical Motor Decoder · NeurIPS 2025
Accessibility and assistive technology › assistive technology
assistive technology deployment
0.012001
Telerehabilitation: Expanding access to rehabilitation expertise · Proc. IEEE 2001
Health and well-being technologies › rehabilitation technology
telerehabilitation
0.012001
Telerehabilitation: Expanding access to rehabilitation expertise · Proc. IEEE 2001

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

pre-training · 1.7autoregressive transformer · 1.7wearable sensors · 0.1video conferencing · 0.1
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2025 A Generalist Intracortical Motor Decoder
abstract
Mapping the relationship between neural activity and motor behavior is a central aim of sensorimotor neuroscience and neurotechnology. While most progress to this end has relied on restricting complexity, the advent of foundation models instead proposes integrating a breadth of data as an alternate avenue for broadly advancing downstream modeling. We quantify this premise for motor decoding from intracortical microelectrode data, pretraining an autoregressive Transformer on 2000 hours of neural population spiking activity paired with diverse motor covariates from over 30 monkeys and humans. The resulting model is broadly useful, benefiting decoding on 8 downstream decoding tasks and generalizing to a variety of neural distribution shifts. However, we also highlight that scaling autoregressive Transformers seems unlikely to resolve limitations stemming from sensor variability and output stereotypy in neural datasets.
Joel Ye, Fabio Rizzoglio, Adam Smoulder, Hongwei Mao, Gary Blumenthal, William Hockeimer, Nicolas Kunigk, Dalton Moore, Patrick Marino, Raeed H. Chowdhury, J. Patrick Mayo, Aaron P. Batista, Steven M. Chase, Michael L. Boninger, Charles Greenspon, Andrew B. Schwartz, Nicholas Hatsopoulos, Lee E. Miller, Kristofer E. Bouchard, Jennifer L. Collinger, Leila Wehbe, Robert A. Gaunt
NeurIPS15
2011 Toward Synergy-Based Brain-Machine Interfaces
abstract
This paper demonstrates a synergy-based brain-machine interface that uses low-dimensional command signals to control a high dimensional virtual hand. First, temporal postural synergies were extracted from the angular velocities of finger joints of five healthy subjects when they performed hand movements that were similar to activities of daily living. Two synergies inspired from the extracted synergies, namely, two-finger pinch and whole-hand grasp, were used in real-time brain control, where a virtual hand with 10 degrees of freedom was controlled to grasp or pinch virtual objects. These two synergies were controlled by electrocorticographic (ECoG) signals recorded from two electrodes of an electrode array that spanned motor and speech areas of an individual with intractable epilepsy, thus demonstrating closed loop control of a synergy-based brain-machine interface.
Ramana Vinjamuri, Douglas J. Weber, Zhi-Hong Mao, Jennifer L. Collinger, Alan D. Degenhart, John W. Kelly, Michael L. Boninger, Elizabeth C. Tyler-Kabara, Wei Wang 0086
IEEE Trans. Inf. Technol. Biomed.7
2001 Telerehabilitation: Expanding access to rehabilitation expertise
abstract
The potential of modern telecommunications and computing technologies as tools in the delivery and evaluation of assistive technology (AT) has been discussed and has been termed telerehabilitation. The problems of providing AT in rural areas parallels the delivery of health care to rural areas where the proportion of people with chronic illnesses is higher and the means to pay for them is reduced. Large distances mean long travel times, increasing costs associated with any service delivery, and consuming valuable time skilled professionals could be using to provide services elsewhere. The technology available for practising telerehabilitation is significant and expanding at a rapid rate. Currently, plain old telephone systems (POTS) and broad-band videoconferencing equipment, Internet and World Wide Web, and embedded processor systems are most widely available. These technologies continue to evolve as well as emerging technologies such as wearable sensors that will have telehabilitation applications. Issues of payment, safety liability, and licensure need to be resolved, as legislation lags the development of new technologies.
Rory A. Cooper, Shirley Fitzgerald, Michael L. Boninger, David M. Brienza, Nigel Shapcott, Rosemarie Cooper, Katherine Flood
Proc. IEEE3