Demo Data from SIGIR 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Ryoma Uchida
dblp:129/5128
· DBLP profile ↗
1ranked-venue papers
1as first author
0since 2021 · last 2012
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Human-computer interaction and ubiquitous computing · 1 · 1 first-author
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Human-computer interaction and pervasive computing
1 paper |
Ubiquitous computing and smart environments · 100% |
Topics — the 2 heaviest of 2, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Ubiquitous computing and smart environments › context recognition
activity recognition |
0.1 | 1 | 2012 | Preliminary evaluation of feature level compensation for missing data in multi-sensor activity recognition · UbiComp 2012 |
Ubiquitous computing and smart environments › pervasive computing infrastructure
multi-sensor systems |
0.0 | 1 | 2012 | Preliminary evaluation of feature level compensation for missing data in multi-sensor activity recognition · UbiComp 2012 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
multiple regression · 0.1kernel regression · 0.1classifier training · 0.1
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2012 | Preliminary evaluation of feature level compensation for missing data in multi-sensor activity recognitionabstractActivity recognition using multiple body-worn sensors can directly monitor the movement of each body part and can recognize various activities accurately. However, using multiple sensors increases the chance of sensor failure or communication failure, and most current activity recognition algorithms do not work when failure occurs due to the difference (reduction) of the dimension of the feature vector from that of complete sensor data expected in system design time. Therefore, we compared three possible techniques to solves this problem on the feature value level: a classifier trained with reduced feature values, feature value compensation with multiple regression, and feature value compensation with kernel regression, in a no failure situation. All of these techniques do not depend on classification algorithms. While creating a regression model, which is in the training phase, requires relatively high computational power, compensation itself can work with low computational power. As overall results, kernel regression had the best performance that was the closest to the no failure situation. Also, the results imply that each sensor position has its own effective method and more accurate coping can be viable with the appropriate choice of the method. Ryoma Uchida, Ren Ohmura |
UbiComp | 1 |