Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Ryoma Uchida

dblp:129/5128 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
1ranked-venue papers
1as first author
0since 2021 · last 2012
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Human-computer interaction and ubiquitous computing · 1 · 1 first-author

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Human-computer interaction and pervasive computing
1 paper
Ubiquitous computing and smart environments · 100%

Topics — the 2 heaviest of 2, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Ubiquitous computing and smart environments › context recognition
activity recognition
0.112012
Preliminary evaluation of feature level compensation for missing data in multi-sensor activity recognition · UbiComp 2012
Ubiquitous computing and smart environments › pervasive computing infrastructure
multi-sensor systems
0.012012
Preliminary evaluation of feature level compensation for missing data in multi-sensor activity recognition · UbiComp 2012

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

multiple regression · 0.1kernel regression · 0.1classifier training · 0.1
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2012 Preliminary evaluation of feature level compensation for missing data in multi-sensor activity recognition
abstract
Activity recognition using multiple body-worn sensors can directly monitor the movement of each body part and can recognize various activities accurately. However, using multiple sensors increases the chance of sensor failure or communication failure, and most current activity recognition algorithms do not work when failure occurs due to the difference (reduction) of the dimension of the feature vector from that of complete sensor data expected in system design time. Therefore, we compared three possible techniques to solves this problem on the feature value level: a classifier trained with reduced feature values, feature value compensation with multiple regression, and feature value compensation with kernel regression, in a no failure situation. All of these techniques do not depend on classification algorithms. While creating a regression model, which is in the training phase, requires relatively high computational power, compensation itself can work with low computational power. As overall results, kernel regression had the best performance that was the closest to the no failure situation. Also, the results imply that each sensor position has its own effective method and more accurate coping can be viable with the appropriate choice of the method.
Ryoma Uchida, Ren Ohmura
UbiComp1