Demo Data from SIGIR 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Anna-Lan Huang
dblp:129/9483
· DBLP profile ↗
4ranked-venue papers
3as first author
0since 2021 · last 2013
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Databases, data management, data science and information retrieval · 4 · 3 first-authorArtificial intelligence and machine learning · 1 · 1 first-author
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Databases, data mining, and information retrieval
1 paper |
Data mining · 44% Information retrieval · 44% Knowledge graphs · 13% |
Topics — the 3 heaviest of 3, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Information retrieval › document processing › document analysis › document representation
concept-based document representation |
0.1 | 1 | 2008 | Clustering Documents with Active Learning Using Wikipedia · ICDM 2008 |
Data mining › clustering
document clustering |
0.1 | 1 | 2008 | Clustering Documents with Active Learning Using Wikipedia · ICDM 2008 |
Knowledge graphs
knowledge graph construction |
0.0 | 1 | 2008 | Clustering Documents with Active Learning Using Wikipedia · ICDM 2008 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
pairwise constraints · 0.1active learning · 0.1
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2013 | Constructing a Focused Taxonomy from a Document Collection
Olena Medelyan, Steve Manion, Jeen Broekstra, Anna Divoli, Anna-Lan Huang, Ian H. Witten |
ESWC | 5 |
| 2012 | Learning a concept-based document similarity measureabstractDocument similarity measures are crucial components of many text‐analysis tasks, including information retrieval, document classification, and document clustering. Conventional measures are brittle: They estimate the surface overlap between documents based on the words they mention and ignore deeper semantic connections. We propose a new measure that assesses similarity at both the lexical and semantic levels, and learns from human judgments how to combine them by using machine‐learning techniques. Experiments show that the new measure produces values for documents that are more consistent with people's judgments than people are with each other. We also use it to classify and cluster large document sets covering different genres and topics, and find that it improves both classification and clustering performance. Anna-Lan Huang, David N. Milne, Eibe Frank, Ian H. Witten |
J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol. | 1 |
| 2009 | Clustering Documents Using a Wikipedia-Based Concept Representation
Anna-Lan Huang, David N. Milne, Eibe Frank, Ian H. Witten |
PAKDD | 1 |
| 2008 | Clustering Documents with Active Learning Using WikipediaabstractWikipedia has been applied as a background knowledge base to various text mining problems, but very few attempts have been made to utilize it for document clustering. In this paper we propose to exploit the semantic knowledge in Wikipedia for clustering, enabling the automatic grouping of documents with similar themes. Although clustering is intrinsically unsupervised, recent research has shown that incorporating supervision improves clustering performance, even when limited supervision is provided. The approach presented in this paper applies supervision using active learning. We first utilize Wikipedia to create a concept-based representation of a text document, with each concept associated to a Wikipedia article. We then exploit the semantic relatedness between Wikipedia concepts to find pair-wise instance-level constraints for supervised clustering, guiding clustering towards the direction indicated by the constraints. We test our approach on three standard text document datasets. Empirical results show that our basic document representation strategy yields comparable performance to previous attempts; and adding constraints improves clustering performance further by up to 20%. Anna-Lan Huang, David N. Milne, Eibe Frank, Ian H. Witten |
ICDM | 1 |