Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Anna-Lan Huang

dblp:129/9483 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
4ranked-venue papers
3as first author
0since 2021 · last 2013
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Databases, data management, data science and information retrieval · 4 · 3 first-authorArtificial intelligence and machine learning · 1 · 1 first-author

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Databases, data mining, and information retrieval
1 paper
Data mining · 44% Information retrieval · 44% Knowledge graphs · 13%

Topics — the 3 heaviest of 3, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Information retrieval › document processing › document analysis › document representation
concept-based document representation
0.112008
Clustering Documents with Active Learning Using Wikipedia · ICDM 2008
Data mining › clustering
document clustering
0.112008
Clustering Documents with Active Learning Using Wikipedia · ICDM 2008
Knowledge graphs
knowledge graph construction
0.012008
Clustering Documents with Active Learning Using Wikipedia · ICDM 2008

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

pairwise constraints · 0.1active learning · 0.1
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2013 Constructing a Focused Taxonomy from a Document Collection
Olena Medelyan, Steve Manion, Jeen Broekstra, Anna Divoli, Anna-Lan Huang, Ian H. Witten
ESWC5
2012 Learning a concept-based document similarity measure
abstract
Document similarity measures are crucial components of many text‐analysis tasks, including information retrieval, document classification, and document clustering. Conventional measures are brittle: They estimate the surface overlap between documents based on the words they mention and ignore deeper semantic connections. We propose a new measure that assesses similarity at both the lexical and semantic levels, and learns from human judgments how to combine them by using machine‐learning techniques. Experiments show that the new measure produces values for documents that are more consistent with people's judgments than people are with each other. We also use it to classify and cluster large document sets covering different genres and topics, and find that it improves both classification and clustering performance.
Anna-Lan Huang, David N. Milne, Eibe Frank, Ian H. Witten
J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol.1
2009 Clustering Documents Using a Wikipedia-Based Concept Representation
Anna-Lan Huang, David N. Milne, Eibe Frank, Ian H. Witten
PAKDD1
2008 Clustering Documents with Active Learning Using Wikipedia
abstract
Wikipedia has been applied as a background knowledge base to various text mining problems, but very few attempts have been made to utilize it for document clustering. In this paper we propose to exploit the semantic knowledge in Wikipedia for clustering, enabling the automatic grouping of documents with similar themes. Although clustering is intrinsically unsupervised, recent research has shown that incorporating supervision improves clustering performance, even when limited supervision is provided. The approach presented in this paper applies supervision using active learning. We first utilize Wikipedia to create a concept-based representation of a text document, with each concept associated to a Wikipedia article. We then exploit the semantic relatedness between Wikipedia concepts to find pair-wise instance-level constraints for supervised clustering, guiding clustering towards the direction indicated by the constraints. We test our approach on three standard text document datasets. Empirical results show that our basic document representation strategy yields comparable performance to previous attempts; and adding constraints improves clustering performance further by up to 20%.
Anna-Lan Huang, David N. Milne, Eibe Frank, Ian H. Witten
ICDM1