Demo Data from SIGIR 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
David I. Gertman
dblp:13/271
· DBLP profile ↗
2ranked-venue papers
0as first author
0since 2021 · last 2008
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Human-computer interaction and ubiquitous computing · 2Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 1
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Human-computer interaction and pervasive computing
2 papers |
Human-robot interaction · 97% Usability and user experience research · 2% User interface design and tools · 1% |
Topics — the 2 heaviest of 4, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Human-robot interaction
teleoperation |
0.1 | 1 | 2008 | How training and experience affect the benefits of autonomy in a dirty-bomb experiment · HRI 2008 |
Human-robot interaction
operator training |
0.0 | 1 | 2008 | How training and experience affect the benefits of autonomy in a dirty-bomb experiment · HRI 2008 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
user study · 0.1simulator-based evaluation · 0.0rating scale · 0.0laboratory experiment · 0.0
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2008 | How training and experience affect the benefits of autonomy in a dirty-bomb experimentabstractA dirty-bomb experiment conducted at the INL is used to evaluate the effectiveness and suitability of three different modes of robot control. The experiment uses three distinct user groups to understand how participants' background and training affect the way in which they use and benefit from autonomy. The results show that the target mode, which involves automated mapping and plume tracing together with a point and click tasking tool, provides the best performance for each group. This is true for objective performance such as source detection and localization accuracy as well as subjective measures such as perceived workload, frustration and preference. The best overall performance is achieved by the Explosive Ordinance Disposal group which has experience in both robot teleoperation and dirty bomb response. The user group that benefits least from autonomy is the Nuclear Engineers that have no experience with either robot operation or dirty bomb response. The group that benefits most from autonomy is the Weapons of Mass Destruction Civil Support Team that has extensive experience related to the task, but no robot training. David J. Bruemmer, Curtis W. Nielsen, David I. Gertman |
HRI | 3 |
| 1982 | Performance-based evaluation of graphic displays for nuclear power plant control roomsabstractThis paper reports several methodologies for evaluating the perceptual and perceptual/decision making aspects of displays used in the control rooms of nuclear power plants. This NRC funded study focuses upon the Safety Parameter Display System (SPDS) and relates the utility of the display to objective performance and preference measures obtained in experimental conditions. The first condition is a traditional laboratory setting where classical experimental methodologies can be employed. The second condition is an interactive control room simulation where the operator's performance is assessed while he/she operates the simulator. The third condition is a rating scale designed to assess operator preferences and opinions regarding a variety of display formats. The goal of this study is the development of a cost-efficient display evaluation methodology which correlates highly with the operators ability to control a plant. Rohn J. Petersen, William W. Banks Jr., David I. Gertman |
CHI | 3 |