Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Jyun-Jie Liao

dblp:13/9741 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
9ranked-venue papers
0as first author
5since 2021 · last 2024
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Theory of computation · 6 · 5 since 2021Security and privacy · 4 · 1 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Theoretical computer science
4 papers
Computational complexity · 100%
Network and information security
2 papers
Cryptographic primitives and cryptanalysis · 64% Hardware security and side channels · 36%

Topics — the 13 heaviest of 14, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Computational complexity
pseudorandomness
1.732023
Hardness Against Linear Branching Programs and More · CCC 2023
Extractors for sum of two sources · STOC 2022
Optimal Error Pseudodistributions for Read-Once Branching Programs · CCC 2020
Computational complexity › pseudorandomness
extractors
1.222023
Hardness Against Linear Branching Programs and More · CCC 2023
Extractors for sum of two sources · STOC 2022
Computational complexity › pseudorandomness › extractors
two-source extractors
0.722022
Extractors for sum of two sources · STOC 2022
Affine Extractors for Almost Logarithmic Entropy · FOCS 2021
Computational complexity › circuit complexity
branching programs
0.712023
Hardness Against Linear Branching Programs and More · CCC 2023
Computational complexity
circuit complexity
0.712023
Hardness Against Linear Branching Programs and More · CCC 2023
Computational complexity › derandomization
hitting set generators
0.712023
Hardness Against Linear Branching Programs and More · CCC 2023
Computational complexity
lower bounds
0.712023
Hardness Against Linear Branching Programs and More · CCC 2023
Computational complexity › pseudorandomness › extractors
affine extractors
0.512021
Affine Extractors for Almost Logarithmic Entropy · FOCS 2021
Computational complexity › randomness extraction
correlation breaker
0.512021
Affine Extractors for Almost Logarithmic Entropy · FOCS 2021
Computational complexity
randomness extraction
0.512021
Affine Extractors for Almost Logarithmic Entropy · FOCS 2021
Cryptographic primitives and cryptanalysis › provable security › security notions
non-malleability
0.412020
Non-malleability Against Polynomial Tampering · CRYPTO (3) 2020
Hardware security and side channels › physical attacks
tampering
0.412020
Non-malleability Against Polynomial Tampering · CRYPTO (3) 2020
Computational complexity › circuit complexity › branching programs
read-once branching programs
0.412020
Optimal Error Pseudodistributions for Read-Once Branching Programs · CCC 2020

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

sumset extractors · 0.7kakeya set · 0.7directional affine extractor · 0.7sumset source · 0.6min-entropy · 0.6somewhere random extractor · 0.5resilient function · 0.5pseudodistributions · 0.4polynomial tampering · 0.4non-malleable codes · 0.4
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2024 Recursive Error Reduction for Regular Branching Programs
Eshan Chattopadhyay, Jyun-Jie Liao
ITCS2
2024 Hide-and-Seek and the Non-resignability of the BUFF Transform
Jelle Don, Serge Fehr, Yu-Hsuan Huang 0003, Jyun-Jie Liao, Patrick Struck
TCC (3)4
2023 Hardness Against Linear Branching Programs and More
abstract
In a recent work, Gryaznov, Pudlák and Talebanfard (CCC '22) introduced a linear variant of read-once branching programs, with motivations from circuit and proof complexity. Such a read-once linear branching program is a branching program where each node is allowed to make 𝔽₂-linear queries, and is read-once in the sense that the queries on each path is linearly independent. As their main result, they constructed an explicit function with average-case complexity 2^{n/3-o(n)} against a slightly restricted model, which they call strongly read-once linear branching programs. The main tool in their lower bound result is a new type of extractor, called directional affine extractors, that they introduced. Our main result is an explicit function with 2^{n-o(n)} average-case complexity against the strongly read-once linear branching program model, which is almost optimal. This result is based on a new connection from this problem to sumset extractors, which is a randomness extractor model introduced by Chattopadhyay and Li (STOC '16) as a generalization of many other well-studied models including two-source extractors, affine extractors and small-space extractors. With this new connection, our lower bound naturally follows from a recent construction of sumset extractors by Chattopadhyay and Liao (STOC '22). In addition, we show that directional affine extractors imply sumset extractors in a restricted setting. We observe that such restricted sumset sources are enough to derive lower bounds, and obtain an arguably more modular proof of the lower bound by Gryaznov, Pudlák and Talebanfard. We also initiate a study of pseudorandomness against linear branching programs. Our main result here is a hitting set generator construction against regular linear branching programs with constant width. We derive this result based on a connection to Kakeya sets over finite fields.
Eshan Chattopadhyay, Jyun-Jie Liao
CCC2
2022 Extractors for sum of two sources
abstract
We consider the problem of extracting randomness from sumset sources, a general class of weak sources introduced by Chattopadhyay and Li (STOC, 2016). An (n,k,C)-sumset source X is a distribution on {0,1}n of the form X1 + X2 + … + XC, where Xi’s are independent sources on n bits with min-entropy at least k. Prior extractors either required the number of sources C to be a large constant or the min-entropy k to be at least 0.51 n.
Eshan Chattopadhyay, Jyun-Jie Liao
STOC2
2021 Affine Extractors for Almost Logarithmic Entropy
abstract
We give an explicit construction of an affine extractor (over$\mathbb{F}_{2}$) that works for affine sources on$n$bits with min-entropy$k\geq\log n\cdot(\log\log n)^{1+o(1)}$. This improves prior work of Li (FOCS'16) that requires min-entropy at least$\text{poly} (\log n)$. Our construction is based on the framework of using correlation breakers and resilient functions, a paradigm that was also used by Li. On a high level, the key sources of our improvement are based on the following new ingredients: (i) A new construction of an affine somewhere random extractor, that we use in a crucial step instead of a linear seeded extractor (for which optimal constructions are not known) that was used by Li. (ii) A near optimal construction of a correlation breaker for linearly correlated sources. The construction of our correlation breaker takes inspiration from an exciting line of recent work that constructs two-source extractors for near logarithmic min-entropy.
Eshan Chattopadhyay, Jesse Goodman, Jyun-Jie Liao
FOCS3
2020 Optimal Error Pseudodistributions for Read-Once Branching Programs
Eshan Chattopadhyay, Jyun-Jie Liao
CCC2
2020 Non-malleability Against Polynomial Tampering
Marshall Ball, Eshan Chattopadhyay, Jyun-Jie Liao, Tal Malkin, Li-Yang Tan
CRYPTO (3)3
2018 On the Complexity of Simulating Auxiliary Input
Yi-Hsiu Chen, Kai-Min Chung, Jyun-Jie Liao
EUROCRYPT (3)3
2012 Fair offline digital content transaction system
abstract
More and more customers are purchasing digital content through the Internet because it is both popular and convenient. However, there are lots of pirated editions of digital products and they have become more available and easier to obtain. Hence, proving who the legal owner of digital content has become an important issue. In this study, the authors want to preserve customer ownership; they propose an intact arbitration mechanism to solve the fairness transaction between the customer and the shop. The arbiter can make correct judgements without the customer's and the shop's private keys in the arbitration phase. In order to achieve the above objectives, the security of this protocol is based on three cryptographic techniques: the subliminal channel, one-way hash function and RSA cryptosystem. Our scheme not only protects a customer's legal ownership of digital content, but also achieves fair transaction, customer anonymity, owner tracing of E-cash and payment security.
Chin-Ling Chen, Jyun-Jie Liao
IET Inf. Secur.2