The widespread application of Large Language Models (LLMs) has motivated a growing interest in their capacity for processing dynamic graphs. Temporal motifs, as an elementary unit and important local property of dynamic graphs which can directly reflect anomalies and unique phenomena, are essential for understanding their evolutionary dynamics and structural features. However, leveraging LLMs for temporal motif analysis on dynamic graphs remains relatively unexplored. In this paper, we systematically study LLM performance on temporal motif-related tasks. Specifically, we propose a comprehensive benchmark, LLMTM (Large Language Models in Temporal Motifs), which includes six tailored tasks across nine temporal motif types. We then conduct extensive experiments to analyze the impacts of different prompting techniques and LLMs (including nine models: openPangu-7B, the DeepSeek-R1-Distill-Qwen series, Qwen2.5-32B-Instruct, GPT-4o-mini, DeepSeek-R1, and o3) on model performance. Informed by our benchmark findings, we develop a tool-augmented LLM agent that leverages precisely engineered prompts to solve these tasks with high accuracy. Nevertheless, the high accuracy of the agent incurs a substantial cost. To address this trade-off, we propose a simple yet effective structure-aware dispatcher that considers both the dynamic graph's structural properties and the LLM's cognitive load to intelligently dispatch queries between the standard LLM prompting and the more powerful agent. Our experiments demonstrate that the structure-aware dispatcher effectively maintains high accuracy while reducing cost.

Pre-training graph foundation models (GFMs) on text-attributed graphs (TAGs) is important for web-scale retrieval and recommendation, where graph entities are matched with textual descriptions. Existing CLIP-style graph-text aligners typically assume one-to-one correspondence: each node is pulled close only to its paired text, and all other pairs are treated as negatives. This overlooks the many-to-many relations common in real TAGs, where a node and its local neighborhood can be semantically related to multiple texts, and vice versa. Meanwhile, TAG supervision is often imperfect: noisy or weak node-text links introduce false-positive pairs, causing contrastive learning to align mismatched semantics. These limitations reveal a fundamental trade-off: leveraging expressive many-to-many signals increases semantic coverage but may propagate errors under noise, whereas strict one-to-one training is more conservative yet still suffers when mismatched pairs remain in the training set. Therefore, we propose ADAligner, a quality-aware graph–text alignment framework that adapts between expressive many-to-many and conservative one-to-one objectives based on estimated alignment reliability. ADAligner tracks batch-level reliability online and adjusts optimization accordingly—promoting soft, subgraph-level alignment when supervision is clean while emphasizing reliable one-to-one alignment by filtering low-confidence pairs under noise. We provide theoretical analysis showing that this closed-loop adaptation is stable and convergent. Experiments on nine TAG benchmarks show that, under 30% mismatched node-text supervision, ADAligner consistently improves cross-modal retrieval by 144.70% on average, zero-/few-shot node classification by 26.13%, and link prediction by 4.70% over the strongest multimodal baseline, demonstrating strong robustness to alignment noise across both unsupervised and transfer settings. Our code is available at https://github.com/karmaisacat-13/ADAligner.