Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Joshua Hernandez

dblp:132/9996 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
4ranked-venue papers
2as first author
0since 2021 · last 2016
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 3 · 2 first-authorSystems, architecture and hardware · 2 · 1 first-authorGraphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 2 · 1 first-authorApplied, interdisciplinary, general and emerging computing · 1

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Artificial intelligence
3 papers
Robot navigation and mapping · 48% 3D vision · 43% Representation and self-supervised learning · 10%

Topics — the 11 heaviest of 11, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Robotics › Robot navigation and mapping › localization
visual-inertial navigation
0.522016
Observability, Identifiability and Sensitivity of Vision-Aided Inertial Navigation · IJCAI 2016
Observability, identifiability and sensitivity of vision-aided inertial navigation · ICRA 2015
Machine learning › Representation and self-supervised learning
invariant representation
0.212015
Multi-view feature engineering and learning · CVPR 2015
Computer vision › 3D vision
local feature descriptor
0.212015
Multi-view feature engineering and learning · CVPR 2015
Robotics › Robot navigation and mapping
localization
0.212015
Observability, identifiability and sensitivity of vision-aided inertial navigation · ICRA 2015
Computer vision › 3D vision
multi-view geometry
0.212015
Multi-view feature engineering and learning · CVPR 2015
Computer vision › 3D vision › feature matching › multi-image matching
multi-view matching
0.212015
Multi-view feature engineering and learning · CVPR 2015
Robotics › Robot navigation and mapping › state estimation
observability analysis
0.212015
Observability, identifiability and sensitivity of vision-aided inertial navigation · ICRA 2015
Computer vision › 3D vision › feature matching › local feature matching
wide-baseline matching
0.212015
Multi-view feature engineering and learning · CVPR 2015
Robotics › Robot navigation and mapping
state estimation
0.112016
Observability, Identifiability and Sensitivity of Vision-Aided Inertial Navigation · IJCAI 2016
Computer vision › 3D vision
pose estimation
0.112015
Observability, identifiability and sensitivity of vision-aided inertial navigation · ICRA 2015
Robotics › Robot navigation and mapping
sensor fusion
0.112015
Observability, identifiability and sensitivity of vision-aided inertial navigation · ICRA 2015

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

sensitivity analysis · 0.2sampling-based approximation · 0.2point-estimate approximation · 0.2minimal sufficient statistics · 0.2identifiability analysis · 0.2filtering · 0.2
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2016 Observability, Identifiability and Sensitivity of Vision-Aided Inertial Navigation
Joshua Hernandez, Konstantine Tsotsos, Stefano Soatto
IJCAI1
2015 Multi-view feature engineering and learning
abstract
We frame the problem of local representation of imaging data as the computation of minimal sufficient statistics that are invariant to nuisance variability induced by viewpoint and illumination. We show that, under very stringent conditions, these are related to “feature descriptors” commonly used in Computer Vision. Such conditions can be relaxed if multiple views of the same scene are available. We propose a sampling-based and a point-estimate based approximation of such a representation, compared empirically on image-to-(multiple)image matching, for which we introduce a multi-view wide-baseline matching benchmark, consisting of a mixture of real and synthetic objects with ground truth camera motion and dense three-dimensional geometry.
Jingming Dong, Nikolaos Karianakis, Damek Davis, Joshua Hernandez, Jonathan Balzer, Stefano Soatto
CVPR4
2015 Observability, identifiability and sensitivity of vision-aided inertial navigation
abstract
We analyze the observability of 3-D pose from the fusion of visual and inertial sensors. Because the model contains unknown parameters, such as sensor biases, the problem is usually cast as a mixed filtering/identification, with the resulting observability analysis providing necessary conditions for convergence to a unique point estimate. Most models treat sensor bias rates as “noise,” independent of other states, including biases themselves, an assumption that is patently violated in practice. We show that, when this assumption is lifted, the resulting model is not observable, and therefore existing analyses cannot be used to conclude that the set of states that are indistinguishable from the measurements is a singleton. In other words, the resulting model is not observable. We therefore re-cast the analysis as one of sensitivity: Rather than attempting to prove that the set of indistinguishable trajectories is a singleton, we derive bounds on its volume, as a function of characteristics of the sensor and other sufficient excitation conditions. This provides an explicit characterization of the indistinguishable set that can be used for analysis and validation purposes.
Joshua Hernandez, Konstantine Tsotsos, Stefano Soatto
ICRA1
2013 Single-cycle, pulse-shaped critical path monitor in the POWER7+ microprocessor
abstract
A 32nm SOI critical path monitor (CPM) that can provide timing measurements to a Digital PLL for dynamic frequency adjustments in the 8-core POWER7+™ microprocessor is described. The CPM calibrates to within 2% of cycle time from nominal to turbo voltages. Its voltage sensitivity is 10mV/bit. It tracks processor temperature sensitivity to within 1.5% of nominal frequency, and has a sample jitter less than 1.5% of nominal frequency. The ability to detect noise dynamically allows the system to operate the processor closer to its optimal frequency for any given voltage, resulting in lower voltage for power savings or higher frequency for performance improvements.
Alan J. Drake, Michael S. Floyd, Richard L. Willaman, Derek J. Hathaway, Joshua Hernandez, Crystal Soja, Marshall D. Tiner, Gary D. Carpenter, Robert M. Senger
ISLPED5