Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Dinglong Duan

dblp:133/5295 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
2ranked-venue papers
0as first author
0since 2021 · last 2019
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 2Graphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 1

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Artificial intelligence
2 papers
3D vision · 100%

Topics — the 4 heaviest of 5, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Computer vision › 3D vision › photometric stereo
non-lambertian photometric stereo
0.622019
A Benchmark Dataset and Evaluation for Non-Lambertian and Uncalibrated Photometric Stereo · IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell. 2019
A Benchmark Dataset and Evaluation for Non-Lambertian and Uncalibrated Photometric Stereo · CVPR 2016
Computer vision › 3D vision
photometric stereo
0.622019
A Benchmark Dataset and Evaluation for Non-Lambertian and Uncalibrated Photometric Stereo · IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell. 2019
A Benchmark Dataset and Evaluation for Non-Lambertian and Uncalibrated Photometric Stereo · CVPR 2016
Computer vision › 3D vision › photometric stereo
uncalibrated photometric stereo
0.622019
A Benchmark Dataset and Evaluation for Non-Lambertian and Uncalibrated Photometric Stereo · IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell. 2019
A Benchmark Dataset and Evaluation for Non-Lambertian and Uncalibrated Photometric Stereo · CVPR 2016
Computer vision › 3D vision › inverse rendering
shape and reflectance estimation
0.112019
A Benchmark Dataset and Evaluation for Non-Lambertian and Uncalibrated Photometric Stereo · IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell. 2019

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

evaluation · 0.4benchmark dataset · 0.4quantitative evaluation · 0.2benchmark dataset construction · 0.2
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2019 A Benchmark Dataset and Evaluation for Non-Lambertian and Uncalibrated Photometric Stereo
abstract
Classic photometric stereo is often extended to deal with real-world materials and work with unknown lighting conditions for practicability. To quantitatively evaluate non-Lambertian and uncalibrated photometric stereo, a photometric stereo image dataset containing objects of various shapes with complex reflectance properties and high-quality ground truth normals is still missing. In this paper, we introduce the 'DiLiGenT' dataset with calibrated Directional Lightings, objects of General reflectance with different shininess, and 'ground Truth' normals from high-precision laser scanning. We use our dataset to quantitatively evaluate state-of-the-art photometric stereo methods for general materials and unknown lighting conditions, selected from a newly proposed photometric stereo taxonomy emphasizing non-Lambertian and uncalibrated methods. The dataset and evaluation results are made publicly available, and we hope it can serve as a benchmark platform that inspires future research.
Boxin Shi, Zhipeng Mo, Dinglong Duan, Sai-Kit Yeung, Ping Tan 0002
IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell.4
2016 A Benchmark Dataset and Evaluation for Non-Lambertian and Uncalibrated Photometric Stereo
abstract
Recent progress on photometric stereo extends the technique to deal with general materials and unknown illumination conditions. However, due to the lack of suitable benchmark data with ground truth shapes (normals), quantitative comparison and evaluation is difficult to achieve. In this paper, we first survey and categorize existing methods using a photometric stereo taxonomy emphasizing on non-Lambertian and uncalibrated methods. We then introduce the 'DiLiGenT' photometric stereo image dataset with calibrated Directional Lightings, objects of General reflectance, and 'ground Truth' shapes (normals). Based on our dataset, we quantitatively evaluate state-of-the-art photometric stereo methods for general non-Lambertian materials and unknown lightings to analyze their strengths and limitations.
Boxin Shi, Zhipeng Mo, Dinglong Duan, Sai-Kit Yeung, Ping Tan 0002
CVPR4