Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Michal Borsky

dblp:133/5359 · also Michal Borský · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
10ranked-venue papers
6as first author
2since 2021 · last 2022
0000-0001-7908-5411ORCID · corroborated

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 7 · 3 first-author · 1 since 2021Graphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 7 · 4 first-authorApplied, interdisciplinary, general and emerging computing · 1 · 1 first-author · 1 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Computer graphics and multimedia
1 paper
Audio and music processing · 75% Multimedia systems and quality of experience · 25%

Topics — the 4 heaviest of 4, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Audio and music processing
audio feature extraction
0.312017
Modal and Nonmodal Voice Quality Classification Using Acoustic and Electroglottographic Features · IEEE ACM Trans. Audio Speech Lang. Process. 2017
Audio and music processing › speech analysis
glottal source features
0.312017
Modal and Nonmodal Voice Quality Classification Using Acoustic and Electroglottographic Features · IEEE ACM Trans. Audio Speech Lang. Process. 2017
Audio and music processing
speech analysis
0.312017
Modal and Nonmodal Voice Quality Classification Using Acoustic and Electroglottographic Features · IEEE ACM Trans. Audio Speech Lang. Process. 2017
Multimedia systems and quality of experience › multimedia quality assessment
voice quality assessment
0.312017
Modal and Nonmodal Voice Quality Classification Using Acoustic and Electroglottographic Features · IEEE ACM Trans. Audio Speech Lang. Process. 2017

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

support vector machine · 0.3random forest · 0.3gaussian mixture model · 0.3deep neural network · 0.3
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2022 Samrómur Children: An Icelandic Speech Corpus
abstract
Samrómur Children is an Icelandic speech corpus intended for the field of automatic speech recognition. It contains 131 hours of read speech from Icelandic children aged between 4 to 17 years. The test portion was meticulously selected to cover a wide range of ages as possible; we aimed to have exactly the same amount of data per age range. The speech was collected with the crowd-sourcing platform Samrómur.is, which is inspired on the “Mozilla’s Common Voice Project”. The corpus was developed within the framework of the “Language Technology Programme for Icelandic 2019 − 2023”; the goal of the project is to make Icelandic available in language-technology applications. Samrómur Children is the first corpus in Icelandic with children’s voices for public use under a Creative Commons license. Additionally, we present baseline experiments and results using Kaldi.
Carlos Daniel Hernandez Mena, David Erik Mollberg, Michal Borsky, Jón Guðnason
LREC3
2022 Toward Sleep Study Automation: Detection Evaluation of Respiratory-Related Events
abstract
The diagnosis of sleep disordered breathing depends on the detection of respiratory-related events: apneas, hypopneas, snores, or respiratory event-related arousals from sleep studies. While a number of automatic detection methods have been proposed, their reproducibility has been an issue, in part due to the absence of a generally accepted protocol for evaluating their results. With sleep measurements this is usually treated as a classification problem and the accompanying issue of localization is not treated as similarly critical. To address these problems we present a detection evaluation protocol that is able to qualitatively assess the match between two annotations of respiratory-related events. This protocol relies on measuring the relative temporal overlap between two annotations in order to find an alignment that maximizes their F1-score at the sequence level. This protocol can be used in applications which require a precise estimate of the number of events, total event duration, and a joint estimate of event number and duration. We assess its application using a data set that contains over 10,000 manually annotated snore events from 9 subjects, and show that when using the American Academy of Sleep Medicine Manual standard, two sleep technologists can achieve an F1-score of 0.88 when identifying the presence of snore events. In addition, we drafted rules for marking snore boundaries and showed that one sleep technologist can achieve F1-score of 0.94 at the same tasks. Finally, we compared this protocol against the protocol that is used to evaluate sleep spindle detection and highlighted the differences.
Michal Borsky, Marta Serwatko, Erna Sif Arnardóttir, Jacky Mallett
IEEE J. Biomed. Health Informatics1
2019 F0 Variability Measures Based on Glottal Closure Instants
Yu-Ren Chien, Michal Borsky, Jón Guðnason
INTERSPEECH2
2019 The Althingi ASR System
Inga Rún Helgadóttir, Anna Björk Nikulásdóttir, Michal Borsky, Judy Y. Fong, Róbert Kjaran, Jón Guðnason
INTERSPEECH3
2017 Classification of voice modes using neck-surface accelerometer data
abstract
This study analyzes signals recorded using a neck-surface accelerometer from subjects producing speech with different voice modes. The purpose is to explore if the recorded waveforms can capture the glottal vibratory patterns which can be related to the movement of the vocal folds and thus voice quality. The accelerometer waveforms do not contain the supraglottal resonances, and these characteristics make the proposed method suitable for real-life voice quality assessment and monitoring as it does not breach patient privacy. The experiments with a Gaussian mexture model classifier demonstrate that different voice qualities produce distinctly different accelerometer waveforms. The system achieved 80.2% and 89.5% for frame- and utterance-level accuracy, respectively, for classifying among modal, breathy, pressed, and rough voice modes using a speaker-dependent classifier. Finally, the article presents characteristic waveforms for each modality and discusses their attributes.
Michal Borsky, Marion Cocude, Daryush D. Mehta, Matías Zanartu, Jón Guðnason
ICASSP1
2017 Objective Severity Assessment from Disordered Voice Using Estimated Glottal Airflow
Yu-Ren Chien, Michal Borsky, Jón Guðnason
INTERSPEECH2
2017 Dithering techniques in automatic recognition of speech corrupted by MP3 compression: Analysis, solutions and experiments
Michal Borsky, Petr Mizera, Petr Pollák, Jan Nouza
Speech Commun.1
2017 Modal and Nonmodal Voice Quality Classification Using Acoustic and Electroglottographic Features
abstract
The goal of this study was to investigate the performance of different feature types for voice quality classification using multiple classifiers. The study compared the COVAREP feature set; which included glottal source features, frequency warped cepstrum and harmonic model features; against the mel-frequency cepstral coefficients (MFCCs) computed from the acoustic voice signal, acoustic-based glottal inverse filtered (GIF) waveform, and electroglottographic (EGG) waveform. Our hypothesis was that MFCCs can capture the perceived voice quality from either of these three voice signals. Experiments were carried out on recordings from 28 participants with normal vocal status who were prompted to sustain vowels with modal and non-modal voice qualities. Recordings were rated by an expert listener using the Consensus Auditory-Perceptual Evaluation of Voice (CAPE-V), and the ratings were transformed into a dichotomous label (presence or absence) for the prompted voice qualities of modal voice, breathiness, strain, and roughness. The classification was done using support vector machines, random forests, deep neural networks and Gaussian mixture model classifiers, which were built as speaker independent using a leave-one-speaker-out strategy. The best classification accuracy of 79.97% was achieved for the full COVAREP set. The harmonic model features were the best performing subset, with 78.47% accuracy, and the static+dynamic MFCCs scored at 74.52%. A closer analysis showed that MFCC and dynamic MFCC features were able to classify modal, breathy, and strained voice quality dimensions from the acoustic and GIF waveforms. Reduced classification performance was exhibited by the EGG waveform.
Michal Borsky, Daryush D. Mehta, Jarrad H. Van Stan, Jón Guðnason
IEEE ACM Trans. Audio Speech Lang. Process.1
2016 Classification of Voice Modality Using Electroglottogram Waveforms
Michal Borsky, Daryush D. Mehta, Julius P. Gudjohnsen, Jón Guðnason
INTERSPEECH1
2015 Spectrally selective dithering for distorted speech recognition
Michal Borsky, Petr Mizera, Petr Pollák
INTERSPEECH1