Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

E. Ackerlind

dblp:133/8059 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
1ranked-venue papers
0as first author
0since 2021 · last 1957
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Theory of computation · 1

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Computer networks
1 paper
Physical-layer communications · 100%

Topics — the 2 heaviest of 2, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Physical-layer communications › signal detection › detection performance analysis
detection probability
0.011957
Automatic bias control for a threshold detector · IRE Trans. Inf. Theory 1957
Physical-layer communications
signal detection
0.011957
Automatic bias control for a threshold detector · IRE Trans. Inf. Theory 1957

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

gaussian noise analysis · 0.0automatic bias control · 0.0
YearPublicationVenuePosition
1957 Automatic bias control for a threshold detector
abstract
A method for automatically controlling the threshold bias in a detector is described and analyzed. In Section I, the threshold bias problem is described: Bias is set for a constant false alarm rate (or a constant false alarm time). By "standard biasing" is meant the common practice of adjusting the required bias under the assumption that the noise is Gaussian and has a flat power spectrum. In Section II, the error that is made by standard biasing, if it turns out the Gaussian noise does not have a flat power spectrum, is given. In Section III, the automatic biasing method is given in the case where a constant false alarm time is required (its operation to maintain a constant false alarm rate is analogous). The device envisioned operates as follows: One bias level\tilde{\nu}_0is used as reference; the number of crossings per false alarm timeTwith positive slope of the noise envelope through\tilde{\nu}_0is averaged over a sufficiently long time to yield a stable valueC. This countCserves to determine the threshold bias\nu. The level\nuchanges only if the "long time" average count changes; it is specifically assumed that there is no response to instantaneous changes inC. It is shown that such a biasing method automatically adjusts to give a constant false alarm time (or rate), whenever the noise is Gaussian, and so has an advantage over the standard biasing method. In Section IV, the efficiency of both methods for non-Gaussian noise, is compared. In Section V, the probability of detection of a short (relative to the averaging time) "sure" signal with Rayleigh distributed amplitude is given when automatic biasing is used; due to the complexity of the expression obtained, no direct comparison has been made with the case where standard biasing is used.
James Dugundji, E. Ackerlind
IRE Trans. Inf. Theory2