Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Yariv Dror Mizrahi

dblp:133/8310 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
3ranked-venue papers
2as first author
0since 2021 · last 2016
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 2 · 2 first-authorGraphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 1

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Artificial intelligence
2 papers
Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning · 83% Multi-agent systems · 17%
Computer architecture, parallel and distributed computing, and storage systems
1 paper
Parallel and multicore computing · 100%

Topics — the 5 heaviest of 5, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning › structured models
graphical models
0.422014
Distributed Parameter Estimation in Probabilistic Graphical Models · NIPS 2014
Linear and Parallel Learning of Markov Random Fields · ICML 2014
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning › statistical inference
parameter estimation
0.422014
Distributed Parameter Estimation in Probabilistic Graphical Models · NIPS 2014
Linear and Parallel Learning of Markov Random Fields · ICML 2014
Knowledge, reasoning and agents › Multi-agent systems › distributed estimation
distributed parameter estimation
0.212014
Distributed Parameter Estimation in Probabilistic Graphical Models · NIPS 2014
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning › structured models › graphical models
markov random field
0.212014
Linear and Parallel Learning of Markov Random Fields · ICML 2014
Parallel and multicore computing
parallel algorithms
0.112014
Linear and Parallel Learning of Markov Random Fields · ICML 2014

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

sufficient statistics · 0.4maximum likelihood estimation · 0.4distributed estimation · 0.2
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2016 Reduced-complexity image segmentation under parallel Markov Random Field formulation using graph partitioning
abstract
Markov Random Field (MRF) algorithms are powerful tools in image analysis to explore contextual information of data. However, the application of these methods to large data means that alternative approaches must be found to circumvent the NP-hard complexity of the MRF optimization. We introduce a MRF-based framework that overcomes this issue by using graph partitioning. The computational complexity is decreased as the optimization/parameter estimation is executed on small subgraphs. PMRF targets 3D microCT datasets, but we include evaluation on the Berkeley Segmentation Dataset (ranking 7th place) to fully compare our method with well-known segmentation algorithms. Segmentation results on the microCT datasets achieve precision higher than 95%.
Talita Perciano, Daniela Ushizima, E. Wes Bethel, Yariv Dror Mizrahi, Dilworth Parkinson, James A. Sethian
ICIP4
2014 Linear and Parallel Learning of Markov Random Fields
abstract
We introduce a new embarrassingly parallel parameter learning algorithm for Markov random fields which is efficient for a large class of practical models. Our algorithm parallelizes naturally over cliques and, for graphs of bounded degree, its complexity is linear in the number of cliques. Unlike its competitors, our algorithm is fully parallel and for log-linear models it is also data efficient, requiring only the local sufficient statistics of the data to estimate parameters.
Yariv Dror Mizrahi, Misha Denil, Nando de Freitas
ICML1
2014 Distributed Parameter Estimation in Probabilistic Graphical Models
Yariv Dror Mizrahi, Misha Denil, Nando de Freitas
NIPS1