Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Agata Kopacz

dblp:134/0350 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
3ranked-venue papers
0as first author
1since 2021 · last 2026
0000-0001-9337-0809ORCID · corroborated

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 2Human-computer interaction and ubiquitous computing · 1 · 1 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Human-computer interaction and pervasive computing
1 paper
User interface design and tools · 87% Interaction techniques and input · 13%

Topics — the 2 heaviest of 3, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
User interface design and tools › design tools
design systems
1.012026
A Dedicated E-Paper Design System for Mobile Phones: Limitations, Design Process and Implementation Insights · CHI 2026
Interaction techniques and input
mobile interaction
0.312026
A Dedicated E-Paper Design System for Mobile Phones: Limitations, Design Process and Implementation Insights · CHI 2026

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

exploratory UX study · 1.0design guidelines · 1.0
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2026 A Dedicated E-Paper Design System for Mobile Phones: Limitations, Design Process and Implementation Insights
abstract
Clarity and ease of interaction are critical for mobile devices that users rely on daily. As smartphone use time rises, manufacturers are exploring e-paper displays for their advantages, including longer battery life and reduced eye strain. Yet, e-paper technology comes with inherent design limitations, such as reduced responsiveness, constrained color ranges, and ghosting. To address these limitations, we present the first version of our E-Paper Design System comprising a set of design components and guidelines developed specifically for e-paper smartphones, with a particular focus on minimalist devices. The E-Paper Design System is released as a free, open resource on Zeroheight and documented in the Appendix for reference. Our design decisions are grounded in technical constraints, prior research and insights from designers and developers using this pilot version of the design system to create custom mobile applications. We also report findings from an exploratory in-house UX study (N=24) testing developed applications, highlight remaining e-paper-specific design challenges and outline future research directions.
Kinga Skorupska, Tomasz Omelan, Aleksander Hamerlik, Agata Kopacz, Daniel Cnotkowski, Jaroslaw Kowalski, Bartosz Muczynski, Radoslaw Nielek, Adam Wierzbicki, Cezary Biele
CHI4
2016 A recommender system of reviewers and experts in reviewing problems
Jaroslaw Protasiewicz, Witold Pedrycz, Marek Kozlowski, Slawomir Dadas, Tomasz Stanislawek, Agata Kopacz, Malgorzata Galezewska
Knowl. Based Syst.6
2016 Discerning Ambient/Focal Attention with Coefficient K
abstract
We introduce coefficient K , defined on a novel parametric scale, derived from processing a traditionally eye-tracked time course of eye movements. Positive and negative ordinates of K indicate focal or ambient viewing, respectively, while the abscissa serves to indicate time, so that K acts as a dynamic indicator of fluctuation between ambient/focal visual behavior. The coefficient indicates the difference between fixation duration and its subsequent saccade amplitude expressed in standard deviation units, facilitating parametric statistical testing. To validate K empirically, we test its utility by capturing ambient and focal attention during serial and parallel visual search tasks (Study 1). We then show how K quantitatively depicts the difference in scanning behaviors when attention is guided by audio description during perception of art (Study 2).
Krzysztof Krejtz, Andrew T. Duchowski, Izabela Krejtz, Agnieszka Szarkowska, Agata Kopacz
ACM Trans. Appl. Percept.5