Demo Data from SIGIR 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Mabel Lie
dblp:134/2873
· DBLP profile ↗
2ranked-venue papers
0as first author
1since 2021 · last 2024
0000-0002-1703-283XORCID · corroborated
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Human-computer interaction and ubiquitous computing · 2 · 1 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Human-computer interaction and pervasive computing
2 papers |
Health and well-being technologies · 34% Accessibility and assistive technology · 28% Design research and methods · 28% | |
| Network and information security
1 paper |
Privacy and data protection · 100% |
Topics — the 5 heaviest of 7, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Accessibility and assistive technology
inclusive design |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | Understanding Antenatal Care Needs through Co-Creation with Roma Women to Inform the Design of mHealth Technologies · CHI 2024 |
Design research and methods › feminist HCI
intersectional design |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | Understanding Antenatal Care Needs through Co-Creation with Roma Women to Inform the Design of mHealth Technologies · CHI 2024 |
Health and well-being technologies › women's health
maternal health technology |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | Understanding Antenatal Care Needs through Co-Creation with Roma Women to Inform the Design of mHealth Technologies · CHI 2024 |
Collaborative and social computing › collaborative design
co-creation |
0.2 | 1 | 2024 | Understanding Antenatal Care Needs through Co-Creation with Roma Women to Inform the Design of mHealth Technologies · CHI 2024 |
Ubiquitous computing and smart environments
smart home |
0.0 | 1 | 2013 | Making family care work: dependence, privacy and remote home monitoring telecare systems · UbiComp 2013 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
thematic analysis · 0.8co-creation workshop · 0.8interviews · 0.3field trial · 0.3
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | Understanding Antenatal Care Needs through Co-Creation with Roma Women to Inform the Design of mHealth TechnologiesabstractWomen from the Roma community experience significant health disparities during their pregnancy. Whilst Mobile Health (mHealth) technologies have the potential to improve antenatal care experiences and health outcomes, research on women from ethnically marginalised backgrounds in developed countries remains limited. We report on a series of Co-creation Workshops with 11 Roma women who have settled in the North of England. In this paper, we present thematic insights about their experiences and needs during pregnancy, and their perceptions and attitudes towards digital technologies to inform the design of culturally sensitive mHealth. We contribute to Human Computer Interaction (HCI) with new empirical research to discourses on Critical Digital Health, Intersectional HCI and Women-centred Design, highlight implications for design and encourage a more critical and intersectional design approach to accommodate better the experiences of ethnically marginalised groups whose needs arguably tend to be overlooked and stereotyped. Caroline Claisse, Abigail Durrant, Mabel Lie |
CHI | 3 |
| 2013 | Making family care work: dependence, privacy and remote home monitoring telecare systemsabstractSupporting independent living for the ageing population in later life is an often-cited application area for ubiquitous computing. Telecare services such as remote monitoring systems are now coming onto the consumer market but there is little knowledge of the impact these technologies may have on relationships between family members and older relatives. We present findings from a live field trial of SHel--a telecare system that allows nominated caregivers to remotely monitor activities--in 17 older adult's homes. Interviews were conducted with the 17 older participants and 11 of their nominated caregivers before, during and after using the system. We establish that such technologies transform existing hidden care routines between family members into care work, and the impact they have upon the sense of independence and privacy of those who are being monitored in their home. John Vines, Stephen Lindsay, Gary W. Pritchard, Mabel Lie, David Greathead, Patrick Olivier, Katie Brittain |
UbiComp | 4 |