Demo Data from SIGIR 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Charles Lever
dblp:134/8710 · also Chaz Lever
· DBLP profile ↗
14ranked-venue papers
3as first author
4since 2021 · last 2023
0000-0002-6148-8981ORCID · corroborated
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Security and privacy · 13 · 3 first-author · 4 since 2021Databases, data management, data science and information retrieval · 1Applied, interdisciplinary, general and emerging computing · 1
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Network and information security
9 papers |
Malware analysis · 53% Network security · 24% Cyber-physical and IoT security · 8% | |
| Computer architecture, parallel and distributed computing, and storage systems
1 paper |
Cloud and datacenter computing · 50% Storage systems · 50% | |
| Computer networks
4 papers |
Internet of things and sensor networks · 64% Network measurement and analytics · 23% Cellular and mobile networks · 13% |
Topics — the 14 heaviest of 20, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Network security › protocol security › DNS security
domain abuse |
0.5 | 2 | 2017 | Hiding in Plain Sight: A Longitudinal Study of Combosquatting Abuse · CCS 2017 Domain-Z: 28 Registrations Later Measuring the Exploitation of Residual Trust in Domains · IEEE Symposium on Security and Privacy 2016 |
Cloud and datacenter computing
cloud storage |
0.5 | 1 | 2021 | Understanding the Growth and Security Considerations of ECS · NDSS 2021 |
Storage systems
erasure-coded storage |
0.5 | 1 | 2021 | Understanding the Growth and Security Considerations of ECS · NDSS 2021 |
Malware analysis › malware
cryptojacking |
0.4 | 1 | 2019 | Outguard: Detecting In-Browser Covert Cryptocurrency Mining in the Wild · WWW 2019 |
Malware analysis › malware detection
cryptojacking detection |
0.4 | 1 | 2019 | Outguard: Detecting In-Browser Covert Cryptocurrency Mining in the Wild · WWW 2019 |
Malware analysis › botnet
botnet analysis |
0.3 | 1 | 2017 | Understanding the Mirai Botnet · USENIX Security Symposium 2017 |
Web and mobile security
phishing |
0.3 | 1 | 2017 | Hiding in Plain Sight: A Longitudinal Study of Combosquatting Abuse · CCS 2017 |
Authentication and access control › authentication › authentication attack
credential theft |
0.2 | 1 | 2023 | Beyond The Gates: An Empirical Analysis of HTTP-Managed Password Stealers and Operators · USENIX Security Symposium 2023 |
Network security › traffic analysis
malicious traffic analysis |
0.2 | 1 | 2013 | The Core of the Matter: Analyzing Malicious Traffic in Cellular Carriers · NDSS 2013 |
Internet of things and sensor networks
iot security |
0.1 | 1 | 2021 | The Circle Of Life: A Large-Scale Study of The IoT Malware Lifecycle · USENIX Security Symposium 2021 |
Network measurement and analytics › internet measurement
DNS measurement |
0.1 | 1 | 2017 | Hiding in Plain Sight: A Longitudinal Study of Combosquatting Abuse · CCS 2017 |
Usable security › security operations › security analytics › cyber threat intelligence
indicator of compromise |
0.1 | 1 | 2017 | A Lustrum of Malware Network Communication: Evolution and Insights · IEEE Symposium on Security and Privacy 2017 |
Network security › intrusion detection and prevention
intrusion detection |
0.1 | 1 | 2017 | A Lustrum of Malware Network Communication: Evolution and Insights · IEEE Symposium on Security and Privacy 2017 |
Network security › protocol security › DNS security
malicious domain detection |
0.1 | 1 | 2016 | Domain-Z: 28 Registrations Later Measuring the Exploitation of Residual Trust in Domains · IEEE Symposium on Security and Privacy 2016 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
empirical measurement · 1.0passive DNS analysis · 0.8measurement study · 0.8empirical analysis · 0.7active DNS data collection · 0.6systematization · 0.4feature extraction · 0.4empirical evaluation · 0.4SVM classification · 0.4measurement · 0.3dynamic analysis · 0.3traffic analysis · 0.2
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023 | Beyond The Gates: An Empirical Analysis of HTTP-Managed Password Stealers and Operators
Athanasios Avgetidis, Omar Alrawi, Kevin Valakuzhy, Charles Lever, Paul Burbage, Angelos D. Keromytis, Fabian Monrose, Manos Antonakakis |
USENIX Security Symposium | 4 |
| 2022 | View from Above: Exploring the Malware Ecosystem from the Upper DNS HierarchyabstractThis work explores authoritative DNS (AuthDNS) as a new measurement perspective for studying the large-scale epidemiology of the malware ecosystem—when and where infections occur, and what infrastructure spreads and controls malware. Utilizing an AuthDNS dataset from a top registrar, we observe malware heterogeneity (202 families), global infrastructure (399,830 IPs in 151 countries) and infection (40,937 querying Autonomous Systems (ASes)) visibility, as well as breadth of temporal coverage (2017–2021). This combination of factors enables an extensive analysis of the malware ecosystem that reinforces prior work on malware infrastructure and also contributes new perspectives on malware infection distribution and lifecycle. We find that malware families re-use infrastructure, especially in cloud hosting countries, but contrary to prior work, we do not detect targeting of clients by countries or industry sector. Furthermore, our 4-year lifecycle analysis of diverse malware families shows that infection analysis is temporally sensitive: over 90% of ASes first query a malicious domain after public detection, and a median of 38.6% ASes only query after domain expiration or takedown. To fit AuthDNS into the broader context of malware research, we conclude with a comparison of experimental vantage points on four qualitative aspects and discuss their advantages and limitations. Ultimately, we establish AuthDNS as a unique measurement perspective capable of measuring global malware infections. Aaron Faulkenberry, Athanasios Avgetidis, Zane Ma, Omar Alrawi, Charles Lever, Panagiotis Kintis, Fabian Monrose, Angelos D. Keromytis, Manos Antonakakis |
ACSAC | 5 |
| 2021 | Understanding the Growth and Security Considerations of ECS
Athanasios Kountouras, Panagiotis Kintis, Athanasios Avgetidis, Thomas Papastergiou, Charles Lever, Michalis Polychronakis, Manos Antonakakis |
NDSS | 5 |
| 2021 | The Circle Of Life: A Large-Scale Study of The IoT Malware Lifecycle
Omar Alrawi, Charles Lever, Kevin Valakuzhy, Ryan Court, Kevin Z. Snow, Fabian Monrose, Manos Antonakakis |
USENIX Security Symposium | 2 |
| 2019 | Security in Plain TXT - Observing the Use of DNS TXT Records in the Wild
Adam Portier, Henry Carter, Charles Lever |
DIMVA | 3 |
| 2019 | SoK: Security Evaluation of Home-Based IoT DeploymentsabstractHome-based IoT devices have a bleak reputation regarding their security practices.On the surface, the insecurities of IoT devices seem to be caused by integration problems that may be addressed by simple measures, but this work finds that to be a naive assumption.The truth is, IoT deployments, at their core, utilize traditional compute systems, such as embedded, mobile, and network.These components have many unexplored challenges such as the effect of over-privileged mobile applications on embedded devices.Our work proposes a methodology that researchers and practitioners could employ to analyze security properties for home-based IoT devices.We systematize the literature for homebased IoT using this methodology in order to understand attack techniques, mitigations, and stakeholders.Further, we evaluate 45 devices to augment the systematized literature in order to identify neglected research areas.To make this analysis transparent and easier to adapt by the community, we provide a public portal to share our evaluation data and invite the community to contribute their independent findings. Omar Alrawi, Charles Lever, Manos Antonakakis, Fabian Monrose |
IEEE Symposium on Security and Privacy | 2 |
| 2019 | Outguard: Detecting In-Browser Covert Cryptocurrency Mining in the WildabstractIn-browser cryptojacking is a form of resource abuse that leverages end-users' machines to mine cryptocurrency without obtaining the users' consent. In this paper, we design, implement, and evaluate Outguard, an automated cryptojacking detection system. We construct a large ground-truth dataset, extract several features using an instrumented web browser, and ultimately select seven distinctive features that are used to build an SVM classification model. Outguardachieves a 97.9% TPR and 1.1% FPR and is reasonably tolerant to adversarial evasions. We utilized Outguardin the wild by deploying it across the Alexa Top 1M websites and found 6,302 cryptojacking sites, of which 3,600 are new detections that were absent from the training data. These cryptojacking sites paint a broad picture of the cryptojacking ecosystem, with particular emphasis on the prevalence of cryptojacking websites and the shared infrastructure that provides clues to the operators behind the cryptojacking phenomenon. Amin Kharraz, Zane Ma, Paul Murley, Charles Lever, Joshua Mason, Andrew Miller 0001, Nikita Borisov, Manos Antonakakis, Michael D. Bailey |
WWW | 4 |
| 2017 | Hiding in Plain Sight: A Longitudinal Study of Combosquatting AbuseabstractDomain squatting is a common adversarial practice where attackers register domain names that are purposefully similar to popular domains. In this work, we study a specific type of domain squatting called "combosquatting," in which attackers register domains that combine a popular trademark with one or more phrases (e.g., betterfacebook[.]com, youtube-live[.]com). We perform the first large-scale, empirical study of combosquatting by analyzing more than 468 billion DNS records - collected from passive and active DNS data sources over almost six years. We find that almost 60% of abusive combosquatting domains live for more than 1,000 days, and even worse, we observe increased activity associated with combosquatting year over year. Moreover, we show that combosquatting is used to perform a spectrum of different types of abuse including phishing, social engineering, affiliate abuse, trademark abuse, and even advanced persistent threats. Our results suggest that combosquatting is a real problem that requires increased scrutiny by the security community. Panagiotis Kintis, Najmehalsadat Miramirkhani, Charles Lever, Yizheng Chen 0001, Rosa Romero Gómez, Nikolaos Pitropakis, Nick Nikiforakis, Manos Antonakakis |
CCS | 3 |
| 2017 | A Lustrum of Malware Network Communication: Evolution and InsightsabstractBoth the operational and academic security communities have used dynamic analysis sandboxes to execute malware samples for roughly a decade. Network information derived from dynamic analysis is frequently used for threat detection, network policy, and incident response. Despite these common and important use cases, the efficacy of the network detection signal derived from such analysis has yet to be studied in depth. This paper seeks to address this gap by analyzing the network communications of 26.8 million samples that were collected over a period of five years. Using several malware and network datasets, our large scale study makes three core contributions. (1) We show that dynamic analysis traces should be carefully curated and provide a rigorous methodology that analysts can use to remove potential noise from such traces. (2) We show that Internet miscreants are increasingly using potentially unwanted programs (PUPs) that rely on a surprisingly stable DNS and IP infrastructure. This indicates that the security community is in need of better protections against such threats, and network policies may provide a solid foundation for such protections. (3) Finally, we see that, for the vast majority of malware samples, network traffic provides the earliest indicator of infection - several weeks and often months before the malware sample is discovered. Therefore, network defenders should rely on automated malware analysis to extract indicators of compromise and not to build early detection systems. Charles Lever, Platon Kotzias, Davide Balzarotti, Juan Caballero, Manos Antonakakis |
IEEE Symposium on Security and Privacy | 1 |
| 2017 | Understanding the Mirai Botnet
Manos Antonakakis, Tim April, Michael D. Bailey, Matt Bernhard, Elie Bursztein, Jaime Cochran, Zakir Durumeric, J. Alex Halderman, Luca Invernizzi, Michael G. Kallitsis, Deepak Kumar 0006, Charles Lever, Zane Ma, Joshua Mason, Damian Menscher, Chad Seaman, Nick Sullivan, Kurt Thomas |
USENIX Security Symposium | 12 |
| 2016 | Enabling Network Security Through Active DNS Datasets
Athanasios Kountouras, Panagiotis Kintis, Charles Lever, Yizheng Chen 0001, Yacin Nadji, David Dagon, Manos Antonakakis, Rodney Joffe |
RAID | 3 |
| 2016 | Domain-Z: 28 Registrations Later Measuring the Exploitation of Residual Trust in DomainsabstractAny individual that re-registers an expired domain implicitly inherits the residual trust associated with the domain's prior use. We find that adversaries can, and do, use malicious re-registration to exploit domain ownership changes - undermining the security of both users and systems. In fact, we find that many seemingly disparate security problems share a root cause in residual domain trust abuse. With this study we shed light on the seemingly unnoticed problem of residual domain trust by measuring the scope and growth of this abuse over the past six years. During this time, we identified 27,758 domains from public blacklists and 238,279 domains resolved by malware that expired and then were maliciously re-registered. To help address this problem, we propose a technical remedy and discuss several policy remedies. For the former, we develop Alembic, a lightweight algorithm that uses only passive observations from the Domain Name System (DNS) to flag potential domain ownership changes. We identify several instances of residual trust abuse using this algorithm, including an expired APT domain that could be used to revive existing infections. Charles Lever, Robert J. Walls, Yacin Nadji, David Dagon, Patrick D. McDaniel, Manos Antonakakis |
IEEE Symposium on Security and Privacy | 1 |
| 2014 | Whitewash: outsourcing garbled circuit generation for mobile devicesabstractGarbled circuits offer a powerful primitive for computation on a user's personal data while keeping that data private. Despite recent improvements, constructing and evaluating circuits of any useful size remains expensive on the limited hardware resources of a smartphone, the primary computational device available to most users around the world. In this work, we develop a new technique for securely outsourcing the generation of garbled circuits to a Cloud provider. By outsourcing the circuit generation, we are able to eliminate the most costly operations from the mobile device, including oblivious transfers. Our proofs of security show that this technique provides the best security guarantees of any existing garbled circuit outsourcing protocol. We also experimentally demonstrate that our new protocol, on average, decreases execution time by 75% and reduces network costs by 60% compared to previous outsourcing protocols. In so doing, we demonstrate that the use of garbled circuits on mobile devices can be made nearly as practical as it is becoming for server-class machines. Henry Carter, Charles Lever, Patrick Traynor |
ACSAC | 2 |
| 2013 | The Core of the Matter: Analyzing Malicious Traffic in Cellular Carriers
Charles Lever, Manos Antonakakis, Bradley Reaves, Patrick Traynor, Wenke Lee |
NDSS | 1 |