Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Eva Schlinger

dblp:135/0995 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
4ranked-venue papers
0as first author
1since 2021 · last 2021
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 4 · 1 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Artificial intelligence
3 papers
Information extraction and text analysis · 32% Machine translation · 30% Representation and self-supervised learning · 19%
Databases, data mining, and information retrieval
1 paper
Information retrieval · 77% Data integration and cleaning · 23%

Topics — the 8 heaviest of 9, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Information retrieval
question answering
0.512021
Open Question Answering over Tables and Text · ICLR 2021
Machine learning › Representation and self-supervised learning › text embedding › text representation learning
cross-lingual representation learning
0.412019
How Multilingual is Multilingual BERT? · ACL (1) 2019
Machine learning › Transfer learning and domain adaptation
cross-lingual transfer
0.412019
How Multilingual is Multilingual BERT? · ACL (1) 2019
Natural language and speech › Information extraction and text analysis
linguistic probing
0.412019
How Multilingual is Multilingual BERT? · ACL (1) 2019
Natural language and speech › Information extraction and text analysis › lexical acquisition
vocabulary expansion
0.212016
Synthesizing Compound Words for Machine Translation · ACL (1) 2016
Natural language and speech › Machine translation
morphologically rich languages
0.212013
Translating into Morphologically Rich Languages with Synthetic Phrases · EMNLP 2013
Natural language and speech › Machine translation
statistical machine translation
0.212013
Translating into Morphologically Rich Languages with Synthetic Phrases · EMNLP 2013
Data integration and cleaning
heterogeneous data
0.112021
Open Question Answering over Tables and Text · ICLR 2021

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

question answering · 0.5phrase-based translation · 0.2classification · 0.2discriminative model · 0.2bayesian morphology model · 0.2
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2021 Open Question Answering over Tables and Text
Wenhu Chen, Ming-Wei Chang, Eva Schlinger, William Yang Wang, William W. Cohen
ICLR3
2019 How Multilingual is Multilingual BERT?
abstract
In this paper, we show that Multilingual BERT (M-BERT), released by Devlin et al. (2019) as a single language model pre-trained from monolingual corpora in 104 languages, is surprisingly good at zero-shot cross-lingual model transfer, in which task-specific annotations in one language are used to fine-tune the model for evaluation in another language.To understand why, we present a large number of probing experiments, showing that transfer is possible even to languages in different scripts, that transfer works best between typologically similar languages, that monolingual corpora can train models for code-switching, and that the model can find translation pairs.From these results, we can conclude that M-BERT does create multilingual representations, but that these representations exhibit systematic deficiencies affecting certain language pairs.
Telmo Pires, Eva Schlinger, Dan Garrette
ACL (1)2
2016 Synthesizing Compound Words for Machine Translation
abstract
Most machine translation systems construct translations from a closed vocabulary of target word forms, posing problems for translating into languages that have productive compounding processes.We present a simple and effective approach that deals with this problem in two phases.First, we build a classifier that identifies spans of the input text that can be translated into a single compound word in the target language.Then, for each identified span, we generate a pool of possible compounds which are added to the translation model as "synthetic" phrase translations.Experiments reveal that (i) we can effectively predict what spans can be compounded; (ii) our compound generation model produces good compounds; and (iii) modest improvements are possible in end-to-end English-German and English-Finnish translation tasks.We additionally introduce KomposEval, a new multi-reference dataset of English phrases and their translations into German compounds.
Austin Matthews, Eva Schlinger, Alon Lavie, Chris Dyer
ACL (1)2
2013 Translating into Morphologically Rich Languages with Synthetic Phrases
abstract
Translation into morphologically rich languages is an important but recalcitrant problem in MT.We present a simple and effective approach that deals with the problem in two phases.First, a discriminative model is learned to predict inflections of target words from rich source-side annotations.Then, this model is used to create additional sentencespecific word-and phrase-level translations that are added to a standard translation model as "synthetic" phrases.Our approach relies on morphological analysis of the target language, but we show that an unsupervised Bayesian model of morphology can successfully be used in place of a supervised analyzer.We report significant improvements in translation quality when translating from English to Russian, Hebrew and Swahili.
Victor Chahuneau, Eva Schlinger, Noah A. Smith, Chris Dyer
EMNLP2