Demo Data from SIGIR 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Cody Seibert
dblp:135/4941
· DBLP profile ↗
1ranked-venue papers
0as first author
0since 2021 · last 2013
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 1Graphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 1
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Artificial intelligence
1 paper |
Image recognition and object detection · 100% |
Topics — the 2 heaviest of 2, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Computer vision › Image recognition and object detection › object counting
crowd counting |
0.2 | 1 | 2013 | Multi-source Multi-scale Counting in Extremely Dense Crowd Images · CVPR 2013 |
Computer vision › Image recognition and object detection › object counting
dense object counting |
0.2 | 1 | 2013 | Multi-source Multi-scale Counting in Extremely Dense Crowd Images · CVPR 2013 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
markov random field · 0.2frequency-domain analysis · 0.2SIFT · 0.2
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2013 | Multi-source Multi-scale Counting in Extremely Dense Crowd ImagesabstractWe propose to leverage multiple sources of information to compute an estimate of the number of individuals present in an extremely dense crowd visible in a single image. Due to problems including perspective, occlusion, clutter, and few pixels per person, counting by human detection in such images is almost impossible. Instead, our approach relies on multiple sources such as low confidence head detections, repetition of texture elements (using SIFT), and frequency-domain analysis to estimate counts, along with confidence associated with observing individuals, in an image region. Secondly, we employ a global consistency constraint on counts using Markov Random Field. This caters for disparity in counts in local neighborhoods and across scales. We tested our approach on a new dataset of fifty crowd images containing 64K annotated humans, with the head counts ranging from 94 to 4543. This is in stark contrast to datasets used for existing methods which contain not more than tens of individuals. We experimentally demonstrate the efficacy and reliability of the proposed approach by quantifying the counting performance. Haroon Idrees, Imran Saleemi, Cody Seibert, Mubarak Shah |
CVPR | 3 |