Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Vitaly Abdrashitov

dblp:135/4969 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
4ranked-venue papers
3as first author
0since 2021 · last 2018
0000-0002-1428-7124ORCID · reported

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Theory of computation · 2 · 1 first-authorApplied, interdisciplinary, general and emerging computing · 1 · 1 first-author

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Theoretical computer science
1 paper
Coding theory · 100%
Computer architecture, parallel and distributed computing, and storage systems
1 paper
Storage systems · 100%

Topics — the 6 heaviest of 6, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Coding theory › distributed storage › distributed storage codes
regenerating codes
0.312018
The Storage Versus Repair-Bandwidth Trade-off for Clustered Storage Systems · IEEE Trans. Inf. Theory 2018
Coding theory › distributed storage › distributed storage codes
storage-bandwidth tradeoff
0.312018
The Storage Versus Repair-Bandwidth Trade-off for Clustered Storage Systems · IEEE Trans. Inf. Theory 2018
Storage systems
distributed storage
0.112018
The Storage Versus Repair-Bandwidth Trade-off for Clustered Storage Systems · IEEE Trans. Inf. Theory 2018
Storage systems › distributed storage
node repair
0.112018
The Storage Versus Repair-Bandwidth Trade-off for Clustered Storage Systems · IEEE Trans. Inf. Theory 2018
Coding theory
network coding
0.112018
The Storage Versus Repair-Bandwidth Trade-off for Clustered Storage Systems · IEEE Trans. Inf. Theory 2018
Coding theory › network coding › linear network coding
random linear network coding
0.112018
The Storage Versus Repair-Bandwidth Trade-off for Clustered Storage Systems · IEEE Trans. Inf. Theory 2018

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

functional repair · 0.7exact-repair code construction · 0.7eavesdropping analysis · 0.7
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2018 The Storage Versus Repair-Bandwidth Trade-off for Clustered Storage Systems
abstract
We study a generalization of the setting of regenerating codes, motivated by applications to storage systems consisting of clusters of storage nodes. There are n clusters in total, with m nodes per cluster. A data file is coded and stored across the mn nodes, with each node storing α symbols. For availability of data, we require that the file be retrievable by downloading the entire content from any subset of k clusters. Nodes represent entities that can fail. We distinguish between intra-cluster and inter-cluster bandwidth (BW) costs during node repair. Node-repair in a cluster is accomplished by downloading β symbols each from any set of d other clusters, dubbed remote helper clusters, and also up to α symbols each from any set of I surviving nodes, dubbed local helper nodes, in the host cluster. We first identify the optimal trade-off between storage-overhead and inter-cluster repair-bandwidth under functional repair, and also present optimal exact-repair code constructions for a class of parameters. The new trade-off is strictly better than what is achievable via space-sharing existing coding solutions, whenever ℓ > 0. We then obtain sharp lower bounds on the necessary intracluster repair BW to achieve optimal trade-off. Under functional repair, random linear network codes (RLNCs) simultaneously optimize usage of both inter- and intra-cluster repair BW; simulation results based on RLNCs suggest optimality of the bounds on intra-cluster repair-bandwidth. Our bounds reveal the interesting fact that, while it is beneficial to increase the number of local helper nodes I in order to improve the storage-vs-inter-cluster-repair-BW trade-off, increasing I not only increases intracluster BW in the host-cluster, but also increases the intra-cluster BW in the remote helper clusters. We also analyze resilience of the clustered storage system against passive eavesdropping by providing file-size bounds and optimal code constructions.
N. Prakash 0001, Vitaly Abdrashitov, Muriel Médard
IEEE Trans. Inf. Theory2
2017 The storage vs repair bandwidth trade-off for multiple failures in clustered storage networks
abstract
We study the trade-off between storage overhead and inter-cluster repair bandwidth in clustered storage systems, while recovering from multiple node failures within a cluster. A cluster is a collection of m nodes, and there are n clusters. For data collection, we download the entire content from any k clusters. For repair of t ≥ 2 nodes within a cluster, we take help from ℓ local nodes, as well as d helper clusters. We characterize the optimal trade-off under functional repair, and also under exact repair for the minimum storage and minimum inter-cluster bandwidth (MBR) operating points. Our bounds show the following interesting facts: 1) When t|(m - ℓ) the tradeoff is the same as that under t = 1, and thus there is no advantage in jointly repairing multiple nodes, 2) When tł(m - ℓ), the optimal file-size at the MBR point under exact repair can be strictly less than that under functional repair. 3) Unlike the case of t = 1, increasing the number of local helper nodes does not necessarily increase the system capacity under functional repair.
Vitaly Abdrashitov, N. Prakash 0001, Muriel Médard
ITW1
2014 Rate and UE Selection Algorithms for Interference-Aware Receivers
abstract
In cellular communications, user equipment (UE, i.e., mobile device)-side interference cancellation (IC) along with multicell coordinated scheduling can significantly reduce the effect of the downlink intercell interference. To aid UE-side IC, a study item, called network-assisted interference cancellation and suppression (NAICS), has been initiated for Long Term Evolution (LTE) Advanced Release 12. Among NAICS receivers, this paper considers a receiver with interference-aware successive decoding (IASD) capability, which is one of the most advanced UE-side IC techniques. The IASD achievable transmission rate is dependent on the interferer transmission rate. Thus, coordination among multiple cells for rate and UE selection would be necessary for the overall network performance enhancement. In this paper, we consider a single dominant interference model and propose an optimal single-user rate selection algorithm based on the belief-propagation framework. In the multi-user-per-cell case we propose several UE and rate selection algorithms and analyze their performance.
Vitaly Abdrashitov, Wooseok Nam, Dongwoon Bai
VTC Spring1
2013 Matched filter decoding of random binary and Gaussian codes in broadband Gaussian channel
abstract
In this paper we consider the additive white Gaussian noise channel with an average input power constraint in the power-limited regime. A well-known result in information theory states that the capacity of this channel can be achieved by random Gaussian coding with analog quadrature amplitude modulation (QAM). In practical applications, however, discrete binary channel codes with digital modulation are most often employed. We analyze the matched filter decoding error probability in random binary and Gaussian coding setups in the wide bandwidth regime, and show that the performance in the two cases is surprisingly similar without explicit adaptation of the codeword construction to the modulation. The result also holds for the multiple access and the broadcast Gaussian channels, when signal-to-noise ratio is low. Moreover, the two modulations can be even mixed together in a single codeword resulting in a hybrid modulation with asymptotically close decoding behavior. In this sense the matched filter decoder demonstrates the performance that is largely insensitive to the choice of binary versus Gaussian modulation.
Vitaly Abdrashitov, Muriel Médard, Dana Moshkovitz
ISIT1