Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Amanda Huff Shultz

dblp:135/8691 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
2ranked-venue papers
1as first author
0since 2021 · last 2013
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 2 · 1 first-authorSystems, architecture and hardware · 2 · 1 first-author

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Artificial intelligence
2 papers
Robot manipulation · 41% Motion planning and robot control · 31% Legged, aerial and field robots · 28%

Topics — the 6 heaviest of 6, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Robotics › Robot manipulation › wearable robotics › prosthetic device
prosthesis control
0.212013
Evaluation of a coordinated control system for a pair of powered transfemoral prostheses · ICRA 2013
Robotics › Motion planning and robot control
robot control
0.212013
Evaluation of a coordinated control system for a pair of powered transfemoral prostheses · ICRA 2013
Robotics › Legged, aerial and field robots
legged robots
0.012013
Evaluation of a coordinated control system for a pair of powered transfemoral prostheses · ICRA 2013
Robotics › Legged, aerial and field robots › legged robots
legged robot locomotion
0.012013
Preliminary evaluation of a walking controller for a powered ankle prosthesis · ICRA 2013
Robotics › Robot manipulation › medical robotics
powered prosthesis
0.012013
Evaluation of a coordinated control system for a pair of powered transfemoral prostheses · ICRA 2013
Robotics › Legged, aerial and field robots
walking control
0.012013
Preliminary evaluation of a walking controller for a powered ankle prosthesis · ICRA 2013

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

motion capture · 0.2level walking controller · 0.2
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2013 Evaluation of a coordinated control system for a pair of powered transfemoral prostheses
abstract
The authors present a control system for a pair of powered prostheses that leverages communication between the devices in order to enhance awareness and improve stability for the user. The control system is implemented on a pair of powered knee and ankle prostheses previously developed by the authors and tested on a healthy subject using able body adapters. The healthy subject also walked on a pair of passive prostheses, with both cases being monitored through motion capture. The kinematic data from the powered system closely match those seen in healthy subjects and show a marked improvement over the passive devices.
Brian Edward Lawson, Amanda Huff Shultz, Michael Goldfarb
ICRA2
2013 Preliminary evaluation of a walking controller for a powered ankle prosthesis
abstract
This paper describes a level walking controller for a powered ankle prosthesis. The controller was implemented on a powered prosthesis prototype and evaluated on a healthy subject by means of able-bodied adapters on a treadmill walking at 1.2 m/s (4.3 km/h). The ankle joint kinematics provided by the powered prosthesis were compared to that provided by a passive (dynamic elastic response) prosthesis, and both compared to the typical kinematics of healthy gait. The comparison indicates the powered prosthesis better reproduces the kinematics of healthy gait, relative to the passive prosthesis. The torque, energy transfer, and power provided by the powered prosthesis were additionally compared to that of a typical healthy subject.
Amanda Huff Shultz, Jason E. Mitchell, Don Truex, Brian Edward Lawson, Michael Goldfarb
ICRA1