Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Nina Wolleb

dblp:135/8711 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
2ranked-venue papers
0as first author
0since 2021 · last 2015
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 2Systems, architecture and hardware · 2

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Human-computer interaction and pervasive computing
1 paper
Interaction techniques and input · 100%

Topics — the 2 heaviest of 2, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Interaction techniques and input › spatial interaction › 3d interaction
3d positioning
0.212013
SEPO: Selecting by pointing as an intuitive human-robot command interface · ICRA 2013
Interaction techniques and input
gesture input
0.012013
SEPO: Selecting by pointing as an intuitive human-robot command interface · ICRA 2013

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

kinect sensor · 0.23d position estimation · 0.2
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2015 Tracking benchmark and evaluation for manipulation tasks
abstract
In this paper we present a public dataset to evaluate trackers used for human and robot manipulation tasks. For these tasks both high DOF motion and high accuracy is needed. We describe in detail, both the process of recording the sequences and how ground truth data was generated for the videos. The videos are tagged with challenges that a tracker would face while tracking the object. As an initial example, we evaluate the performance of six published trackers [5], [11], [12], [13], [15], [6] and analyse their result. We describe a new evaluation metric to test sensitivity of trackers to speed. A total of 100 annotated and tagged sequences are reported. All the videos, ground truth data, original implementation of trackers and evaluation scripts are made publicly available on the website so others can extend the results on their trackers and evaluation.
Ankush Roy, Nina Wolleb, Camilo Perez Quintero, Martin Jägersand
ICRA3
2013 SEPO: Selecting by pointing as an intuitive human-robot command interface
abstract
Pointing to indicate direction or position is one of the intuitive communication mechanisms used by humans in all life stages. Our aim is to develop a natural human-robot command interface using pointing gestures for human-robot interaction (HRI). We propose an interface based on the Kinect sensor for selecting by pointing (SEPO) in a 3D real-world situation, where the user points to a target object or location and the interface returns the 3D position coordinates of the target. Through our interface we perform three experiments to study precision and accuracy of human pointing in typical household scenarios: pointing to a “wall”, pointing to a “table”, and pointing to a “floor”. Our results prove that the proposed SEPO interface enables users to point and select objects with an average 3D position accuracy of 9:6 cm in household situations.
Camilo Perez Quintero, Romeo Tatsambon Fomena, Azad Shademan, Nina Wolleb, Travis Dick, Martin Jägersand
ICRA4