Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

James Eaton

dblp:136/5035 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
5ranked-venue papers
4as first author
0since 2021 · last 2016
0000-0003-1611-8276ORCID · corroborated

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Graphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 3 · 3 first-authorArtificial intelligence and machine learning · 1 · 1 first-authorDatabases, data management, data science and information retrieval · 1

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Computer graphics and multimedia
1 paper
Audio and music processing · 100%

Topics — the 3 heaviest of 4, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Audio and music processing › room acoustics
direct-to-reverberant energy ratio
0.212016
Estimation of Room Acoustic Parameters: The ACE Challenge · IEEE ACM Trans. Audio Speech Lang. Process. 2016
Audio and music processing › room acoustics › room acoustic parameter estimation
reverberation time estimation
0.212016
Estimation of Room Acoustic Parameters: The ACE Challenge · IEEE ACM Trans. Audio Speech Lang. Process. 2016
Audio and music processing › room acoustics
room acoustic parameter estimation
0.212016
Estimation of Room Acoustic Parameters: The ACE Challenge · IEEE ACM Trans. Audio Speech Lang. Process. 2016

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

machine learning · 0.2analytical approaches · 0.2
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2016 Ontology-assisted provenance visualization for supporting enterprise search of engineering and business files
Saiful Khan, Urszula Kanturska, Tom Waters, James Eaton, René Bañares-Alcántara, Min Chen 0001
Adv. Eng. Informatics4
2016 Estimation of Room Acoustic Parameters: The ACE Challenge
abstract
Reverberation time (T60) and Direct-to-reverberant ratio (DRR) are important parameters which together can characterize sound captured by microphones in nonanechoic rooms. These parameters are important in speech processing applications such as speech recognition and dereverberation. The values of T60and DRR can be estimated directly from the acoustic impulse response (AIR) of the room. In practice, the AIR is not normally available, in which case these parameters must be estimated blindly from the observed speech in the microphone signal. The acoustic characterization of environments (ACE) challenge aimed to determine the state-of-the-art in blind acoustic parameter estimation and also to stimulate research in this area. A summary of the ACE challenge, and the corpus used in the challenge is presented together with an analysis of the results. Existing algorithms were submitted alongside novel contributions, the comparative results for which are presented in this paper. The challenge showed that T60estimation is a mature field where analytical approaches dominate whilst DRR estimation is a less mature field where machine learning approaches are currently more successful.
James Eaton, Nikolay D. Gaubitch, Alastair H. Moore, Patrick A. Naylor
IEEE ACM Trans. Audio Speech Lang. Process.1
2015 Direct-to-Reverberant Ratio estimation using a null-steered beamformer
abstract
Reverberation affects the quality and intelligibility of distant speech recorded in a room. Direct-to-Reverberant Ratio (DRR) is a useful measure for assessing the acoustic configuration and can be used to inform dereverberation algorithms. We describe a novel DRR estimation algorithm applicable where the signal was recorded with two or more microphones, such as mobile communications devices and laptops. The method uses a null-steered beamformer. In simulations the proposed method yields accurate DRR estimates to within ±4 dB across a wide variety of room sizes, reverberation times and source-receiver distances. It is also shown that the proposed method is more robust to background noise than a baseline approach. The best estimation accuracy is obtained in the region from -5 to 5 dB which is a relevant range for portable devices.
James Eaton, Alastair H. Moore, Patrick A. Naylor, Jan Skoglund
ICASSP1
2014 Noise-robust detection of peak-clipping in decoded speech
abstract
Clipping is a commonplace problem in voice telecommunications and detection of clipping is useful in a range of speech processing applications. We analyse and evaluate the performance of three previously presented algorithms for clipping detection in decoded speech in high levels of ambient noise. We identify a baseline method which is well known for clipping detection, determine experimentally the optimized operation parameter for the baseline approach, and use this in our experiments. Our results indicate that the new algorithms outperform the baseline except at extreme levels of clipping and negative signal-to-noise ratios.
James Eaton, Patrick A. Naylor
ICASSP1
2013 Noise-robust reverberation time estimation using spectral decay distributions with reduced computational cost
abstract
Reverberation Time (T60) is an important measure of the acoustic properties of a room. It can provide information about the acoustic environment, the intelligibility, and quality of speech recorded in the room, and help improve the performance of speech processing algorithms with reverberant speech. Where the acoustic impulse response of the room is not available, the T60must be estimated non-intrusively from reverberant speech. State-of-the-art non-intrusive T60estimators have been shown to be strongly biased in the presence of noise. We describe a novel T60estimation algorithm based on spectral decay distributions that provides robustness to additive noise for a range of realistic noise types for signal-to-noise ratios in the range 0 to 35 dB and T60s between 200 and 950 ms. The proposed method also has much reduced computational cost.
James Eaton, Nikolay D. Gaubitch, Patrick A. Naylor
ICASSP1