Demo Data from SIGIR 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Tongfei Chen
dblp:137/9630
· DBLP profile ↗
17ranked-venue papers
4as first author
8since 2021 · last 2025
0009-0004-2808-2148ORCID · corroborated
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 13 · 4 first-author · 7 since 2021Graphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 3Databases, data management, data science and information retrieval · 2 · 1 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Artificial intelligence
8 papers |
Information extraction and text analysis · 30% Language models and text generation · 15% Image recognition and object detection · 9% | |
| Databases, data mining, and information retrieval
4 papers |
Information retrieval · 97% Data mining · 3% |
Topics — the 23 heaviest of 25, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Computer vision › Image recognition and object detection
object detection |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Prompt as Knowledge Bank: Boost Vision-language model via Structural Representation for zero-shot medical detection · ICLR 2025 |
Machine learning › Representation and self-supervised learning
structured representation |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Prompt as Knowledge Bank: Boost Vision-language model via Structural Representation for zero-shot medical detection · ICLR 2025 |
Computer vision › Vision and language
vision-language model |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Prompt as Knowledge Bank: Boost Vision-language model via Structural Representation for zero-shot medical detection · ICLR 2025 |
Information retrieval
document retrieval |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Multi-Field Adaptive Retrieval · ICLR 2025 |
Information retrieval
retrieval models |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Multi-Field Adaptive Retrieval · ICLR 2025 |
Natural language and speech › Language models and text generation › natural language understanding › sentence pair modeling
natural language inference |
0.8 | 2 | 2020 | Uncertain Natural Language Inference · ACL 2020 Learning to Rank for Plausible Plausibility · ACL (1) 2019 |
Machine learning › Reinforcement learning
policy optimization |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | Learning to Retrieve Iteratively for In-Context Learning · EMNLP 2024 |
Information retrieval › retrieval-augmented generation
iterative retrieval |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | Learning to Retrieve Iteratively for In-Context Learning · EMNLP 2024 |
Natural language and speech › Language models and text generation › decoding
constrained decoding |
0.7 | 1 | 2023 | BenchCLAMP: A Benchmark for Evaluating Language Models on Syntactic and Semantic Parsing · NeurIPS 2023 |
Natural language and speech › Information extraction and text analysis
semantic parsing |
0.7 | 1 | 2023 | BenchCLAMP: A Benchmark for Evaluating Language Models on Syntactic and Semantic Parsing · NeurIPS 2023 |
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning
structured prediction |
0.7 | 1 | 2023 | A Unified View of Evaluation Metrics for Structured Prediction · EMNLP 2023 |
Natural language and speech › Information extraction and text analysis
syntactic parsing |
0.7 | 1 | 2023 | BenchCLAMP: A Benchmark for Evaluating Language Models on Syntactic and Semantic Parsing · NeurIPS 2023 |
Computer vision › Video understanding and tracking › temporal localization
boundary prediction |
0.6 | 1 | 2022 | An Empirical Study on Finding Spans · EMNLP 2022 |
Natural language and speech › Information extraction and text analysis
named entity recognition |
0.6 | 1 | 2022 | An Empirical Study on Finding Spans · EMNLP 2022 |
Natural language and speech › Information extraction and text analysis
span selection |
0.6 | 1 | 2022 | An Empirical Study on Finding Spans · EMNLP 2022 |
Natural language and speech › Information extraction and text analysis
entity typing |
0.4 | 1 | 2020 | Hierarchical Entity Typing via Multi-level Learning to Rank · ACL 2020 |
Information retrieval
evaluation |
0.3 | 1 | 2018 | A Test Collection for Coreferent Mention Retrieval · SIGIR 2018 |
Information retrieval › evaluation
test collection |
0.3 | 1 | 2018 | A Test Collection for Coreferent Mention Retrieval · SIGIR 2018 |
Information retrieval › evaluation › test collection
test collection construction |
0.3 | 1 | 2018 | A Test Collection for Coreferent Mention Retrieval · SIGIR 2018 |
Medical and health informatics › medical imaging
medical image analysis |
0.3 | 1 | 2025 | Prompt as Knowledge Bank: Boost Vision-language model via Structural Representation for zero-shot medical detection · ICLR 2025 |
Information retrieval
retrieval-augmented generation |
0.3 | 1 | 2025 | Multi-Field Adaptive Retrieval · ICLR 2025 |
Natural language and speech › Information extraction and text analysis › data annotation
text annotation |
0.1 | 1 | 2020 | Uncertain Natural Language Inference · ACL 2020 |
Data mining › text mining
information extraction and text analysis |
0.1 | 1 | 2018 | A Test Collection for Coreferent Mention Retrieval · SIGIR 2018 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
dense retrieval · 2.4knowledge bank · 1.7cross-modal feature fusion · 1.7reinforcement learning · 1.5policy optimization · 1.5lexical retrieval · 0.9adaptive field weighting · 0.9prompt-based learning · 0.7fine-tuning · 0.7constrained decoding · 0.7span enumeration · 0.6boundary prediction · 0.6margin-based loss · 0.4cross-entropy loss · 0.4query by example · 0.3pooling · 0.3human annotation · 0.3
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | Prompt as Knowledge Bank: Boost Vision-language model via Structural Representation for zero-shot medical detectionabstractZero-shot medical detection can further improve detection performance without relying on annotated medical images even upon the fine-tuned model, showing great clinical value. Recent studies leverage grounded vision-language models (GLIP) to achieve this by using detailed disease descriptions as prompts for the target disease name during the inference phase.
However, these methods typically treat prompts as equivalent context to the target name, making it difficult to assign specific disease knowledge based on visual information, leading to a coarse alignment between images and target descriptions. In this paper, we propose StructuralGLIP, which introduces an auxiliary branch to encode prompts into a latent knowledge bank layer-by-layer, enabling more context-aware and fine-grained alignment. Specifically, in each layer, we select highly similar features from both the image representation and the knowledge bank, forming structural representations that capture nuanced relationships between image patches and target descriptions. These features are then fused across modalities to further enhance detection performance.
Extensive experiments demonstrate that StructuralGLIP achieves a +4.1\% AP improvement over prior state-of-the-art methods across seven zero-shot medical detection benchmarks, and consistently improves fine-tuned models by +3.2\% AP on endoscopy image datasets. Yuguang Yang 0007, Tongfei Chen, Linlin Yang 0001, Chunyu Xie, Dawei Leng, Xianbin Cao 0001, Baochang Zhang 0001 |
ICLR | 2 |
| 2025 | Multi-Field Adaptive RetrievalabstractDocument retrieval for tasks such as search and retrieval-augmented generation typically involves datasets that are _unstructured_: free-form text without explicit internal structure in each document. However, documents can have some structure, containing fields such as an article title, a message body, or an HTML header. To address this gap, we introduce Multi-Field Adaptive Retrieval (mFAR), a flexible framework that accommodates any number and any type of document indices on _semi-structured_ data. Our framework consists of two main steps: (1) the decomposition of an existing document into fields, each indexed independently through dense and lexical methods, and (2) learning a model which adaptively predicts the importance of a field by conditioning on the document query, allowing on-the-fly weighting of the most likely field(s). We find that our approach allows for the optimized use of dense versus lexical representations across field types, significantly improves in document ranking over a number of existing retrievers, and achieves state-of-the-art performance for multi-field structured data. Millicent Li, Tongfei Chen, Benjamin Van Durme, Patrick Xia 0002 |
ICLR | 2 |
| 2024 | Learning to Retrieve Iteratively for In-Context LearningabstractWe introduce iterative retrieval, a novel framework that empowers retrievers to make iterative decisions through policy optimization.Finding an optimal portfolio of retrieved items is a combinatorial optimization problem, generally considered NP-hard.This approach provides a learned approximation to such a solution, meeting specific task requirements under a given family of large language models (LLMs).We propose a training procedure based on reinforcement learning, incorporating feedback from LLMs.We instantiate an iterative retriever for composing in-context learning (ICL) exemplars and apply it to various semantic parsing tasks that demand synthesized programs as outputs.By adding only 4M additional parameters for state encoding, we convert an offthe-shelf dense retriever into a stateful iterative retriever, outperforming previous methods in selecting ICL exemplars on semantic parsing datasets such as SMCALFLOW, TREEDST, and MTOP.Additionally, the trained iterative retriever generalizes across different inference LLMs beyond the one used during training. Yunmo Chen, Tongfei Chen, Harsh Jhamtani, Patrick Xia 0002, Richard Shin, Jason Eisner, Benjamin Van Durme |
EMNLP | 2 |
| 2023 | Iterative Document-level Information Extraction via Imitation LearningabstractWe present a novel iterative extraction model, ITERX, for extracting complex relations, or templates, i.e., #-tuples representing a mapping from named slots to spans of text within a document.Documents may feature zero or more instances of a template of any given type, and the task of template extraction entails identifying the templates in a document and extracting each template's slot values.Our imitation learning approach casts the problem as a Markov decision process (MDP), and relieves the need to use predefined template orders to train an extractor.It leads to state-of-the-art results on two established benchmarks -4-ary relation extraction on SCIREX and template extraction on MUC-4 -as well as a strong baseline on the new BETTER Granular task. 1 Yunmo Chen, William Gantt, Weiwei Gu, Tongfei Chen, Aaron Steven White, Benjamin Van Durme |
EACL | 4 |
| 2023 | A Unified View of Evaluation Metrics for Structured PredictionabstractWe present a conceptual framework that unifies a variety of evaluation metrics for different structured prediction tasks (e.g.event and relation extraction, syntactic and semantic parsing).Our framework requires representing the outputs of these tasks as objects of certain data types, and derives metrics through matching of common substructures, possibly followed by normalization.We demonstrate how commonly used metrics for a number of tasks can be succinctly expressed by this framework, and show that new metrics can be naturally derived in a bottom-up way based on an output structure.We release a library that enables this derivation to create new metrics. 1 Finally, we consider how specific characteristics of tasks motivate metric design decisions, and suggest possible modifications to existing metrics in line with those motivations. Yunmo Chen, William Gantt, Tongfei Chen, Aaron Steven White, Benjamin Van Durme |
EMNLP | 3 |
| 2023 | BenchCLAMP: A Benchmark for Evaluating Language Models on Syntactic and Semantic ParsingabstractRecent work has shown that generation from a prompted or fine-tuned language model can perform well at semantic parsing when the output is constrained to be a valid semantic representation. We introduce BenchCLAMP, a Benchmark to evaluate Constrained LAnguage Model Parsing, that includes context-free grammars for seven semantic parsing datasets and two syntactic parsing datasets with varied output meaning representations, as well as a constrained decoding interface to generate only valid outputs covered by these grammars. We provide low, medium, and high resource splits for each dataset, allowing accurate comparison of various language models under different data regimes. Our benchmark supports evaluation of language models using prompt-based learning as well as fine-tuning. We benchmark seven language models, including two GPT-3 variants available only through an API. Our experiments show that encoder-decoder pretrained language models can achieve similar performance or even surpass state-of-the-art methods for both syntactic and semantic parsing when the model output is constrained to be valid. Subhro Roy, Sam Thomson, Tongfei Chen, Richard Shin, Adam Pauls, Jason Eisner, Benjamin Van Durme |
NeurIPS | 3 |
| 2022 | An Empirical Study on Finding SpansabstractWe present an empirical study on methods for span finding, the selection of consecutive tokens in text for some downstream tasks.We focus on approaches that can be employed in training end-to-end information extraction systems, and find there is no definitive solution without considering task properties, and provide our observations to help with future design choices: 1) a tagging approach often yields higher precision while span enumeration and boundary prediction provide higher recall; 2) span type information can benefit a boundary prediction approach; 3) additional contextualization does not help span finding in most cases. Weiwei Gu, Boyuan Zheng 0001, Yunmo Chen, Tongfei Chen, Benjamin Van Durme |
EMNLP | 4 |
| 2021 | Complement Lexical Retrieval Model with Semantic Residual Embeddings
Luyu Gao, Zhuyun Dai, Tongfei Chen, Zhen Fan 0003, Benjamin Van Durme, Jamie Callan |
ECIR (1) | 3 |
| 2020 | Hierarchical Entity Typing via Multi-level Learning to RankabstractWe propose a novel method for hierarchical entity classification that embraces ontological structure at both training and during prediction.At training, our novel multi-level learning-to-rank loss compares positive types against negative siblings according to the type tree.During prediction, we define a coarseto-fine decoder that restricts viable candidates at each level of the ontology based on already predicted parent type(s).We achieve stateof-the-art across multiple datasets, particularly with respect to strict accuracy.1 Tongfei Chen, Yunmo Chen, Benjamin Van Durme |
ACL | 1 |
| 2020 | Uncertain Natural Language InferenceabstractWe introduce Uncertain Natural Language Inference (UNLI), a refinement of Natural Language Inference (NLI) that shifts away from categorical labels, targeting instead the direct prediction of subjective probability assessments.We demonstrate the feasibility of collecting annotations for UNLI by relabeling a portion of the SNLI dataset under a probabilistic scale, where items even with the same categorical label differ in how likely people judge them to be true given a premise.We describe a direct scalar regression modeling approach, and find that existing categorically labeled NLI data can be used in pre-training.Our best models approach human performance, demonstrating models may be capable of more subtle inferences than the categorical bin assignment employed in current NLI tasks. Tongfei Chen, Zhengping Jiang, Adam Poliak, Keisuke Sakaguchi, Benjamin Van Durme |
ACL | 1 |
| 2019 | Learning to Rank for Plausible PlausibilityabstractResearchers illustrate improvements in contextual encoding strategies via resultant performance on a battery of shared Natural Language Understanding (NLU) tasks.Many of these tasks are of a categorical prediction variety: given a conditioning context (e.g., an NLI premise), provide a label based on an associated prompt (e.g., an NLI hypothesis).The categorical nature of these tasks has led to common use of a cross entropy log-loss objective during training.We suggest this loss is intuitively wrong when applied to plausibility tasks, where the prompt by design is neither categorically entailed nor contradictory given the context.Log-loss naturally drives models to assign scores near 0.0 or 1.0, in contrast to our proposed use of a margin-based loss.Following a discussion of our intuition, we describe a confirmation study based on an extreme, synthetically curated task derived from MultiNLI.We find that a margin-based loss leads to a more plausible model of plausibility.Finally, we illustrate improvements on the Choice Of Plausible Alternative (COPA) task through this change in loss. Tongfei Chen, Benjamin Van Durme |
ACL (1) | 2 |
| 2019 | Confidence Scoring Using Whitebox Meta-models with Linear Classifier ProbesabstractWe propose a novel confidence scoring mechanism for deep neural networks based on a two-model paradigm involving a base model and a meta-model. The confidence score is learned by the meta-model observing the base model succeeding/failing at its task. As features to the meta-model, we investigate linear classifier probes inserted between the various layers of the base model. Our experiments demonstrate that this approach outperforms multiple baselines in a filtering task, i.e., task of rejecting samples with low confidence. Experimental results are presented using CIFAR-10 and CIFAR-100 dataset with and without added noise. We discuss the importance of confidence scoring to bridge the gap between experimental and real-world applications. Tongfei Chen, Jirí Navrátil 0001, Vijay S. Iyengar, Karthikeyan Shanmugam 0001 |
AISTATS | 1 |
| 2019 | Espresso: A Fast End-to-End Neural Speech Recognition ToolkitabstractWe present Espresso, an open-source, modular, extensible end-to-end neural automatic speech recognition (ASR) toolkit based on the deep learning library PyTorch and the popular neural machine translation toolkit FAIRSEQ. ESRESSO supports distributed training across GPUs and computing nodes, and features various decoding approaches commonly employed in ASR, including look-ahead word-based language model fusion, for which a fast, parallelized decoder is implemented. Espresso achieves state-of-the-art ASR performance on the WSJ, LibriSpeech, and Switchboard data sets among other end-to-end systems without data augmentation, and is 4-11x faster for decoding than similar systems (e.g. ESPNET). Yiming Wang 0006, Sanjeev Khudanpur, Tongfei Chen, Hainan Xu, Shuoyang Ding, Hang Lv 0001, Yiwen Shao, Nanyun Peng 0001, Lei Xie 0001, Shinji Watanabe 0001 |
ASRU | 3 |
| 2019 | End-to-end Anchored Speech RecognitionabstractVoice-controlled house-hold devices, like Amazon Echo or Google Home, face the problem of performing speech recognition of device-directed speech in the presence of interfering background speech, i.e., background noise and interfering speech from another person or media device in proximity need to be ignored. We propose two end-to-end models to tackle this problem with information extracted from the anchored segment. The anchored segment refers to the wake-up word part of an audio stream, which contains valuable speaker information that can be used to suppress interfering speech and background noise. The first method is called Multi-source Attention where the attention mechanism takes both the speaker information and decoder state into consideration. The second method directly learns a frame-level mask on top of the encoder output. We also explore a multi-task learning setup where we use the ground truth of the mask to guide the learner. Given that audio data with interfering speech is rare in our training data, we also propose a way to synthesize "noisy" speech from "clean" speech to mitigate the mismatch between training and test data. Our proposed methods show up to 15% relative reduction in WER for Amazon Alexa live data with interfering background speech without significantly degrading on clean speech. Yiming Wang 0006, I-Fan Chen, Yuzong Liu, Tongfei Chen, Björn Hoffmeister |
ICASSP | 5 |
| 2018 | A Pruned Rnnlm Lattice-Rescoring Algorithm for Automatic Speech RecognitionabstractLattice-rescoring is a common approach to take advantage of recurrent neural language models in ASR, where a word-lattice is generated from 1st-pass decoding and the lattice is then rescored with a neural model, and ann-gram approximation method is usually adopted to limit the search space. In this work, we describe a pruned lattice-rescoring algorithm for ASR, improving the n-gram approximation method. The pruned algorithm further limits the search space and uses heuristic search to pick better histories when expanding the lattice. Experiments show that the proposed algorithm achieves better ASR accuracies while running much faster than the standard algorithm. In particular, it brings a 4x speedup for lattice-rescoring with 4-gram approximation while giving better recognition accuracies than the standard algorithm. Hainan Xu, Tongfei Chen, Dongji Gao, Yiming Wang 0006, Ke Li 0018, Nagendra K. Goel, Yishay Carmiel, Daniel Povey, Sanjeev Khudanpur |
ICASSP | 2 |
| 2018 | A Test Collection for Coreferent Mention RetrievalabstractThis paper introduces the coreferent mention retrieval task, in which the goal is to retrieve sentences that mention a specific entity based on a query by example in which one sentence mentioning that entity is provided. The development of a coreferent mention retrieval test collection is then described. Results are presented for five coreferent mention retrieval systems, both to illustrate the use of the collection and to specify the results that were pooled on which human coreference judgments were performed. The new test collection is built from content that is available from the Linguistic Data Consortium; the partitioning and human annotations used to create the test collection atop that content are being made freely available. Rashmi Sankepally, Tongfei Chen, Benjamin Van Durme, Douglas W. Oard |
SIGIR | 2 |
| 2013 | Human-Computer Interactive Chinese Word Segmentation: An Adaptive Dirichlet Process Mixture Model Approach
Tongfei Chen, Xiaojun Zou, Weimeng Zhu |
IJCNLP | 1 |