Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Chris Baume

dblp:137/9665 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
1ranked-venue papers
1as first author
0since 2021 · last 2018
0000-0002-9799-8596ORCID · reported

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Human-computer interaction and ubiquitous computing · 1 · 1 first-author

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Human-computer interaction and pervasive computing
1 paper
Interaction techniques and input · 77% Collaborative and social computing · 23%
Computer graphics and multimedia
1 paper
Audio and music processing · 100%

Topics — the 3 heaviest of 4, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Audio and music processing › audio editing
speech editing
0.112018
A Contextual Study of Semantic Speech Editing in Radio Production · Int. J. Hum. Comput. Stud. 2018
Audio and music processing
speech processing
0.112018
A Contextual Study of Semantic Speech Editing in Radio Production · Int. J. Hum. Comput. Stud. 2018
Collaborative and social computing
cooperative work
0.112018
A Contextual Study of Semantic Speech Editing in Radio Production · Int. J. Hum. Comput. Stud. 2018

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

qualitative study · 0.7contextual inquiry · 0.7automatic speech recognition · 0.7
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2018 A Contextual Study of Semantic Speech Editing in Radio Production
abstract
Radio production involves editing speech-based audio using tools that represent sound using simple waveforms. Semantic speech editing systems allow users to edit audio using an automatically generated transcript, which has the potential to improve the production workflow. To investigate this, we developed a semantic audio editor based on a pilot study. Through a contextual qualitative study of five professional radio producers at the BBC, we examined the existing radio production process and evaluated our semantic editor by using it to create programmes that were later broadcast. We observed that the participants in our study wrote detailed notes about their recordings and used annotation to mark which parts they wanted to use. They collaborated closely with the presenter of their programme to structure the contents and write narrative elements. Participants reported that they often work away from the office to avoid distractions, and print transcripts so they can work away from screens. They also emphasised that listening is an important part of production, to ensure high sound quality. We found that semantic speech editing with automated speech recognition can be used to improve the radio production workflow, but that annotation, collaboration, portability and listening were not well supported by current semantic speech editing systems. In this paper, we make recommendations on how future semantic speech editing systems can better support the requirements of radio production.
Chris Baume, Mark D. Plumbley, Janko Calic, David M. Frohlich
Int. J. Hum. Comput. Stud.1