Demo Data from SIGIR 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
U. N. Niranjan
dblp:138/5755 · also Uma-Naresh Niranjan
· DBLP profile ↗
10ranked-venue papers
2as first author
2since 2021 · last 2023
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 8 · 2 first-author · 2 since 2021Graphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 4 · 1 first-author · 2 since 2021Systems, architecture and hardware · 1
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Artificial intelligence
2 papers |
Efficient and distributed learning · 42% Language models and text generation · 21% Trustworthy machine learning · 13% | |
| Theoretical computer science
2 papers |
Algorithms and data structures · 60% Mathematical optimization · 40% | |
| Databases, data mining, and information retrieval
1 paper |
Information retrieval · 50% Recommender systems · 50% | |
| Computer graphics and multimedia
1 paper |
Geometric modeling and processing · 100% |
Topics — the 14 heaviest of 15, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Machine learning › Efficient and distributed learning › model compression
knowledge distillation |
0.6 | 1 | 2022 | Adversarial Data Augmentation for Task-Specific Knowledge Distillation of Pre-trained Transformers · AAAI 2022 |
Machine learning › Efficient and distributed learning
model compression |
0.6 | 1 | 2022 | Adversarial Data Augmentation for Task-Specific Knowledge Distillation of Pre-trained Transformers · AAAI 2022 |
Recommender systems › personalized ranking
pairwise ranking |
0.3 | 1 | 2017 | Inductive Pairwise Ranking: Going Beyond the n log(n) Barrier · AAAI 2017 |
Information retrieval
ranking |
0.3 | 1 | 2017 | Inductive Pairwise Ranking: Going Beyond the n log(n) Barrier · AAAI 2017 |
Algorithms and data structures › ranking
pairwise comparison ranking |
0.3 | 1 | 2017 | Inductive Pairwise Ranking: Going Beyond the n log(n) Barrier · AAAI 2017 |
Algorithms and data structures › sequence algorithms
sorting |
0.3 | 1 | 2017 | Inductive Pairwise Ranking: Going Beyond the n log(n) Barrier · AAAI 2017 |
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning › structured models
latent variable model |
0.2 | 1 | 2015 | Online tensor methods for learning latent variable models · J. Mach. Learn. Res. 2015 |
Machine learning › Learning theory
online learning |
0.2 | 1 | 2015 | Online tensor methods for learning latent variable models · J. Mach. Learn. Res. 2015 |
Machine learning › Optimization for machine learning
stochastic optimization |
0.2 | 1 | 2015 | Online tensor methods for learning latent variable models · J. Mach. Learn. Res. 2015 |
Geometric modeling and processing
shape decomposition |
0.2 | 1 | 2014 | Puzzhull: Cavity and protrusion hierarchy to fit conformal polygons · Comput. Aided Des. 2014 |
Mathematical optimization
nonconvex optimization |
0.2 | 1 | 2014 | Non-convex Robust PCA · NIPS 2014 |
Mathematical optimization › continuous optimization › matrix optimization › matrix recovery
robust principal component analysis |
0.2 | 1 | 2014 | Non-convex Robust PCA · NIPS 2014 |
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning › adversarial machine learning
adversarial data augmentation |
0.2 | 1 | 2022 | Adversarial Data Augmentation for Task-Specific Knowledge Distillation of Pre-trained Transformers · AAAI 2022 |
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning › robustness
adversarial robustness |
0.2 | 1 | 2022 | Adversarial Data Augmentation for Task-Specific Knowledge Distillation of Pre-trained Transformers · AAAI 2022 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
pairwise preference learning · 0.6knowledge distillation · 0.6adversarial data augmentation · 0.6GPT-3 · 0.6BERT · 0.6tensor decomposition · 0.2stochastic optimization · 0.2non-convex optimization · 0.2conformal polygon fitting · 0.2
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023 | Revisiting the Efficiency-Accuracy Tradeoff in Adapting Transformer Models via Adversarial Fine-TuningabstractAdversarial fine-tuning (i.e., training on adversarial perturbed inputs) has demonstrated promising results in improving the accuracy of natural language understanding tasks. However, the improved accuracy does not come for free but is accompanied by a significantly prolonged training time, limiting their applicability to larger and more complex models. This work revisits the efficiency-accuracy trade-off in adversarial fine-tuning by systematically analyzing if adversarial fine-tuning methods, in conjunction with several efficiency optimizations, are suitable for adapting pre-trained Transformer models for natural language understanding tasks. Our results show that multiple design choices are crucial in determining the efficiency-accuracy trade-off, and we introduce a method, ScaLA, that achieves better accuracy-vs-speed trade-off than prior methods. We show in experiments that our proposed method attains up to 14.7× adaptation speedups on BERT, RoBERTa, and T5, while achieving comparable accuracy to existing methods. Minjia Zhang, U. N. Niranjan, Yuxiong He |
ECAI | 2 |
| 2022 | Adversarial Data Augmentation for Task-Specific Knowledge Distillation of Pre-trained TransformersabstractDeep and large pre-trained language models (e.g., BERT, GPT-3) are state-of-the-art for various natural language processing tasks. However, the huge size of these models brings challenges to fine-tuning and online deployment due to latency and cost constraints. Existing knowledge distillation methods reduce the model size, but they may encounter difficulties transferring knowledge from the teacher model to the student model due to the limited data from the downstream tasks. In this work, we propose AD^2, a novel and effective data augmentation approach to improving the task-specific knowledge transfer when compressing large pre-trained transformer models. Different from prior methods, AD^2 performs distillation by using an enhanced training set that contains both original inputs and adversarially perturbed samples that mimic the output distribution from the teacher. Experimental results show that this method allows better transfer of knowledge from the teacher to the student during distillation, producing student models that retain 99.6\% accuracy of the teacher model while outperforming existing task-specific knowledge distillation baselines by 1.2 points on average over a variety of natural language understanding tasks. Moreover, compared with alternative data augmentation methods, such as text-editing-based approaches, AD^2 is up to 28 times faster while achieving comparable or higher accuracy. In addition, when AD^2 is combined with more advanced task-agnostic distillation, we can advance the state-of-the-art performance even more. On top of the encouraging performance, this paper also provides thorough ablation studies and analysis. The discovered interplay between KD and adversarial data augmentation for compressing pre-trained Transformers may further inspire more advanced KD algorithms for compressing even larger scale models. Minjia Zhang, U. N. Niranjan, Yuxiong He |
AAAI | 2 |
| 2019 | Guaranteed Scalable Learning of Latent Tree Models
Furong Huang, U. N. Niranjan, Ioakeim Perros, Robert Chen 0001, Jimeng Sun 0001, Anima Anandkumar |
UAI | 2 |
| 2017 | Inductive Pairwise Ranking: Going Beyond the n log(n) Barrier
U. N. Niranjan, Arun Rajkumar |
AAAI | 1 |
| 2017 | Provable Inductive Robust PCA via Iterative Hard Thresholding
U. N. Niranjan, Arun Rajkumar, Theja Tulabandhula |
UAI | 1 |
| 2016 | Tensor vs. Matrix Methods: Robust Tensor Decomposition under Block Sparse PerturbationsabstractRobust tensor CP decomposition involves decomposing a tensor into low rank and sparse components. We propose a novel non-convex iterative algorithm with guaranteed recovery. It alternates between low-rank CP decomposition through gradient ascent (a variant of the tensor power method), and hard thresholding of the residual. We prove convergence to the globally optimal solution under natural incoherence conditions on the low rank component, and bounded level of sparse perturbations. We compare our method with natural baselines, which apply robust matrix PCA either to the \em flattened tensor, or to the matrix slices of the tensor. Our method can provably handle a far greater level of perturbation when the sparse tensor is block-structured. This naturally occurs in many applications such as the foreground-background separation task in videos. Our experiments validate these findings. Thus, we establish that tensor methods can tolerate a higher level of gross corruptions compared to matrix methods. Anima Anandkumar, Prateek Jain 0002, Yang Shi 0005, U. N. Niranjan |
AISTATS | 4 |
| 2016 | Tensor Contractions with Extended BLAS Kernels on CPU and GPUabstractTensor contractions constitute a key computational ingredient of numerical multi-linear algebra. However, as the order and dimension of tensors grow, the time and space complexities of tensor-based computations grow quickly. In this paper, we propose and evaluate new BLAS-like primitives that are capable of performing a wide range of tensor contractions on CPU and GPU efficiently. We begin by focusing on single-index contractions involving all the possible configurations of second-order and third-order tensors. Then, we discuss extensions to more general cases. Existing approaches for tensor contractions spend large amounts of time restructuring the data which typically involves explicit copy and transpose operations. In this work, we summarize existing approaches and present library-based approaches that avoid memory movement. Through systematic benchmarking, we demonstrate that our approach can achieve 10x speedup on a K40c GPU and 2x speedup on dual-socket Haswell-EP CPUs, using MKL and CUBLAS respectively, for small and moderate tensor sizes. This is relevant in many machine learning applications such as deep learning, where tensor sizes tend to be small, but require numerous tensor contraction operations to be performed successively. Concretely, we implement a Tucker decomposition and show that using our kernels yields atleast an order of magnitude speedup as compared to state-of-the-art libraries. Yang Shi 0005, U. N. Niranjan, Anima Anandkumar, Cris Cecka |
HiPC | 2 |
| 2015 | Online tensor methods for learning latent variable models
Furong Huang, U. N. Niranjan, Mohammad Umar Hakeem, Anima Anandkumar |
J. Mach. Learn. Res. | 2 |
| 2014 | Non-convex Robust PCA
Praneeth Netrapalli, U. N. Niranjan, Sujay Sanghavi, Anima Anandkumar, Prateek Jain 0002 |
NIPS | 2 |
| 2014 | Puzzhull: Cavity and protrusion hierarchy to fit conformal polygons
Shanaz Y. Mistry, U. N. Niranjan, Meenakshisundaram Gopi |
Comput. Aided Des. | 2 |