Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Antonio Marcedone

dblp:138/8983 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
7ranked-venue papers
0as first author
4since 2021 · last 2024
0000-0001-5109-1641ORCID · corroborated

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Security and privacy · 7 · 4 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Network and information security
7 papers
Cryptographic protocols and secure computation · 84% Cryptographic primitives and cryptanalysis · 12% Network security · 3%
Artificial intelligence
1 paper
Efficient and distributed learning · 100%

Topics — the 13 heaviest of 16, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Cryptographic protocols and secure computation › key management
key transparency
1.222023
ELEKTRA: Efficient Lightweight multi-dEvice Key TRAnsparency · CCS 2023
Rotatable Zero Knowledge Sets - Post Compromise Secure Auditable Dictionaries with Application to Key Transparency · ASIACRYPT (3) 2022
Cryptographic protocols and secure computation
key management
0.812024
Compact Key Storage - A Modern Approach to Key Backup and Delegation · CRYPTO (2) 2024
Cryptographic protocols and secure computation › secure messaging
end-to-end encryption
0.712023
End-to-End Encrypted Zoom Meetings: Proving Security and Strengthening Liveness · EUROCRYPT (5) 2023
Cryptographic protocols and secure computation › proof systems
zero-knowledge proofs
0.612022
Rotatable Zero Knowledge Sets - Post Compromise Secure Auditable Dictionaries with Application to Key Transparency · ASIACRYPT (3) 2022
Cryptographic protocols and secure computation › proof systems › zero-knowledge proofs
zero-knowledge sets
0.612022
Rotatable Zero Knowledge Sets - Post Compromise Secure Auditable Dictionaries with Application to Key Transparency · ASIACRYPT (3) 2022
Cryptographic protocols and secure computation › secure multiparty computation
secure two-party computation
0.412019
LevioSA: Lightweight Secure Arithmetic Computation · CCS 2019
Cryptographic protocols and secure computation
secure aggregation
0.312017
Practical Secure Aggregation for Privacy-Preserving Machine Learning · CCS 2017
Cryptographic protocols and secure computation
secure multiparty computation
0.312017
Practical Secure Aggregation for Privacy-Preserving Machine Learning · CCS 2017
Cryptographic protocols and secure computation › key management
public key infrastructure
0.212023
ELEKTRA: Efficient Lightweight multi-dEvice Key TRAnsparency · CCS 2023
Network security › secure communication
secure group communication
0.212023
End-to-End Encrypted Zoom Meetings: Proving Security and Strengthening Liveness · EUROCRYPT (5) 2023
Cryptographic protocols and secure computation › secure computation primitives
oblivious linear function evaluation
0.112019
LevioSA: Lightweight Secure Arithmetic Computation · CCS 2019
Machine learning › Efficient and distributed learning
federated learning
0.112017
Practical Secure Aggregation for Privacy-Preserving Machine Learning · CCS 2017
Machine learning › Efficient and distributed learning › federated learning
privacy-preserving federated learning
0.112017
Practical Secure Aggregation for Privacy-Preserving Machine Learning · CCS 2017

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

authenticated data structure · 0.7secure aggregation · 0.6secret sharing · 0.6post-compromise security · 0.6ligero optimization · 0.4lattice-based OLE · 0.4beaver triples · 0.4IPS compiler · 0.4homomorphic encryption · 0.2
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2024 Compact Key Storage - A Modern Approach to Key Backup and Delegation
Yevgeniy Dodis, Daniel Jost 0001, Antonio Marcedone
CRYPTO (2)3
2023 ELEKTRA: Efficient Lightweight multi-dEvice Key TRAnsparency
abstract
Key Transparency (KT) systems enable service providers of end-to-end encrypted communication (E2EE) platforms to maintain a Verifiable Key Directory (VKD) that maps each user's identifier, such as a username or email address, to their identity public key(s). Users periodically monitor the directory to ensure their own identifier maps to the correct keys, thus detecting any attempt to register a fake key on their behalf to Meddler-in-the-Middle (MitM) their communications.
Julia Len, Melissa Chase, Esha Ghosh, Daniel Jost 0001, Balachandar Kesavan, Antonio Marcedone
CCS6
2023 End-to-End Encrypted Zoom Meetings: Proving Security and Strengthening Liveness
Yevgeniy Dodis, Daniel Jost 0001, Balachandar Kesavan, Antonio Marcedone
EUROCRYPT (5)4
2022 Rotatable Zero Knowledge Sets - Post Compromise Secure Auditable Dictionaries with Application to Key Transparency
Yevgeniy Dodis, Esha Ghosh, Eli Goldin, Balachandar Kesavan, Antonio Marcedone, Merry Ember Mou
ASIACRYPT (3)6
2019 LevioSA: Lightweight Secure Arithmetic Computation
abstract
We study the problem of secure two-party computation of arithmetic circuits in the presence of active ("malicious") parties. This problem is motivated by privacy-preserving numerical computations, such as ones arising in the context of machine learning training and classification, as well as in threshold cryptographic schemes. In this work, we design, optimize, and implement anactively secure protocol for secure two-party arithmetic computation. A distinctive feature of our protocol is that it can make a fully modular black-box use of any passively secure implementation of oblivious linear function evaluation (OLE). OLE is a commonly used primitive for secure arithmetic computation, analogously to the role of oblivious transfer in secure computation for Boolean circuits. For typical (large but not-too-narrow) circuits, our protocol requires roughly 4 invocations of passively secure OLE per multiplication gate. This significantly improves over the recent TinyOLE protocol (Döttling et al., ACM CCS 2017), which requires 22 invocations of actively secure OLE in general, or 44 invocations of a specific code-based passively secure OLE. Our protocol follows the high level approach of the IPS compiler (Ishai et al., CRYPTO 2008, TCC 2009), optimizing it in several ways. In particular, we adapt optimization ideas that were used in the context of the practical zero-knowledge argument system Ligero (Ames et al., ACM CCS 2017) to the more general setting of secure computation, and explore the possibility of boosting efficiency by employing a "leaky" passively secure OLE protocol. The latter is motivated by recent (passively secure) lattice-based OLE implementations in which allowing such leakage enables better efficiency. We showcase the performance of our protocol by applying its implementation to several useful instances of secure arithmetic computation. On "wide" circuits, such as ones computing a fixed function on many different inputs, our protocol is 5x faster and transmits 4x less data than the state-of-the-art Overdrive (Keller et al., Eurocrypt 2018). Our benchmarks include a general passive-to-active OLE compiler, authenticated generation of "Beaver triples", and a system for securely outsourcing neural network classification. The latter is the first actively secure implementation of its kind, strengthening the passive security provided by recent related works (Mohassel and Zhang, IEEE S&P 2017; Juvekar et al., USENIX 2018).
Carmit Hazay, Yuval Ishai, Antonio Marcedone, Muthuramakrishnan Venkitasubramaniam
CCS3
2017 Practical Secure Aggregation for Privacy-Preserving Machine Learning
abstract
We design a novel, communication-efficient, failure-robust protocol for secure aggregation of high-dimensional data. Our protocol allows a server to compute the sum of large, user-held data vectors from mobile devices in a secure manner (i.e. without learning each user's individual contribution), and can be used, for example, in a federated learning setting, to aggregate user-provided model updates for a deep neural network. We prove the security of our protocol in the honest-but-curious and active adversary settings, and show that security is maintained even if an arbitrarily chosen subset of users drop out at any time. We evaluate the efficiency of our protocol and show, by complexity analysis and a concrete implementation, that its runtime and communication overhead remain low even on large data sets and client pools. For 16-bit input values, our protocol offers $1.73 x communication expansion for 210 users and 220-dimensional vectors, and 1.98 x expansion for 214 users and 224-dimensional vectors over sending data in the clear.
Kallista A. Bonawitz, Ben Kreuter, Antonio Marcedone, H. Brendan McMahan, Sarvar Patel, Daniel Ramage, Aaron Segal, Karn Seth
CCS4
2014 Authenticating Computation on Groups: New Homomorphic Primitives and Applications
Dario Catalano, Antonio Marcedone, Orazio Puglisi
ASIACRYPT (2)2