Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Ana Ion

dblp:139/7682 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
2ranked-venue papers
0as first author
0since 2021 · last 2015
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Systems, architecture and hardware · 1

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Computer architecture, parallel and distributed computing, and storage systems
1 paper
Cloud and datacenter computing · 70% Storage systems · 30%

Topics — the 3 heaviest of 4, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Storage systems › data reduction
data deduplication
0.212014
Squirrel: scatter hoarding VM image contents on IaaS compute nodes · HPDC 2014
Cloud and datacenter computing › cloud service models
infrastructure as a service
0.212014
Squirrel: scatter hoarding VM image contents on IaaS compute nodes · HPDC 2014
Cloud and datacenter computing › virtualization › virtual machine management
virtual machine image management
0.212014
Squirrel: scatter hoarding VM image contents on IaaS compute nodes · HPDC 2014

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

snapshot · 0.2deduplication · 0.2compression · 0.2
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2015 Kangaroo: A Tenant-Centric Software-Defined Cloud Infrastructure
abstract
Applications on cloud infrastructures acquire virtual machines (VMs) from providers when necessary. The current interface for acquiring VMs from most providers, however, is too limiting for the tenants, in terms of granularity in which VMs can be acquired (e.g., small, medium, large, etc.), while giving very limited control over their placement. The former leads to VM underutilization, and the latter has performance implications, both translating into higher costs for the tenants. In this work, we leverage nested virtualization and a networking overlay to tackle these problems. We present Kangaroo, an Open Stack-based virtual infrastructure provider, and IPOPsm, a virtual networking switch for communication between nested VMs over different infrastructure VMs. In addition, we design and implement Skippy, the realization of our proposed virtual infrastructure API for programming Kangaroo. Our benchmarks show that through careful mapping of nested VMs to infrastructure VMs, Kangaroo achieves up to an order of magnitude better performance, with only half the cost on Amazon EC2. Further, Kangaroo's unified Open Stack API allows us to migrate an entire application between Amazon EC2 and our local Open Nebula deployment within a few minutes, without any downtime or modification to the application code.
Kaveh Razavi, Ana Ion, Genc Tato, Kyuho Jeong, Renato J. O. Figueiredo, Guillaume Pierre, Thilo Kielmann
IC2E2
2014 Squirrel: scatter hoarding VM image contents on IaaS compute nodes
abstract
In IaaS clouds, virtual machines are booted on demand from user-provided disk images. Both the number of virtual machine images (VMIs) and their large size(GBs), challenge storage and network transfer solutions, and lead to perceivably slow VM startup times. In previous work, we proposed using small VMI caches (O(100MB)) that contain those parts of a VMI that are actually needed for booting. Here, we present Squirrel, a fully replicated storage architecture that exploits deduplication, compression, and snapshots from the ZFS file system, and lets us keep large quantities of VMI caches on all compute nodes of a data center with modest storage requirements. (Much like rodents cache precious food in many distributed places.) Our evaluation shows that we can store VMI caches for all 600+ community images of Windows Azure, worth 16.4TB of raw data, within 10GB of disk space and 60MB of main memory on each compute node of our DAS-4 cluster. Extrapolation to several thousands of images predicts the scalability of our approach.
Kaveh Razavi, Ana Ion, Thilo Kielmann
HPDC2