Demo Data from SIGIR 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Allyx Fontaine
dblp:139/8186
· DBLP profile ↗
6ranked-venue papers
3as first author
0since 2021 · last 2016
0009-0006-8926-5153ORCID · verified
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Theory of computation · 4 · 2 first-authorDatabases, data management, data science and information retrieval · 1Applied, interdisciplinary, general and emerging computing · 1 · 1 first-author
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Theoretical computer science
2 papers |
Algorithms and data structures · 63% Distributed computing theory · 25% Computational complexity · 8% |
Topics — the 10 heaviest of 10, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Algorithms and data structures › sequence algorithms › string algorithms › string matching
k mismatches |
0.2 | 1 | 2016 | The k-mismatch problem revisited · SODA 2016 |
Algorithms and data structures › data streams
streaming algorithms |
0.2 | 1 | 2016 | The k-mismatch problem revisited · SODA 2016 |
Algorithms and data structures › data streams › streaming algorithms
streaming pattern matching |
0.2 | 1 | 2016 | The k-mismatch problem revisited · SODA 2016 |
Algorithms and data structures › sequence algorithms
string algorithms |
0.2 | 1 | 2016 | The k-mismatch problem revisited · SODA 2016 |
Algorithms and data structures › sequence algorithms › string algorithms
string matching |
0.2 | 1 | 2016 | The k-mismatch problem revisited · SODA 2016 |
Computational complexity › complexity measures
bit complexity |
0.2 | 1 | 2013 | Optimal bit complexity randomised distributed MIS and maximal matching algorithms for anonymous rings · Inf. Comput. 2013 |
Distributed computing theory
distributed graph algorithms |
0.2 | 1 | 2013 | Optimal bit complexity randomised distributed MIS and maximal matching algorithms for anonymous rings · Inf. Comput. 2013 |
Distributed computing theory › distributed graph algorithms
maximal independent set |
0.2 | 1 | 2013 | Optimal bit complexity randomised distributed MIS and maximal matching algorithms for anonymous rings · Inf. Comput. 2013 |
Distributed computing theory › distributed graph algorithms
maximal matching |
0.2 | 1 | 2013 | Optimal bit complexity randomised distributed MIS and maximal matching algorithms for anonymous rings · Inf. Comput. 2013 |
Coding theory › error-correcting codes › coding metrics
hamming distance |
0.1 | 1 | 2016 | The k-mismatch problem revisited · SODA 2016 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
randomized algorithm · 0.4approximation algorithm · 0.2distributed algorithm · 0.2
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2016 | Certified Impossibility Results and Analyses in Coq of Some Randomised Distributed Algorithms
Allyx Fontaine, Akka Zemmari |
ICTAC | 1 |
| 2016 | The k-mismatch problem revisitedabstractWe revisit the complexity of one of the most basic problems in pattern matching. In the k-mismatch problem we must compute the Hamming distance between a pattern of length m and every m-length substring of a text of length n, as long as that Hamming distance is at most k. Where the Hamming distance is greater than k at some alignment of the pattern and text, we simply output “No”. We study this problem in both the standard offline setting and also as a streaming problem. In the streaming k-mismatch problem the text arrives one symbol at a time and we must give an output before processing any future symbols. Our main results are as follows: Our first result is a deterministic O(nk2 log k/m + n polylog m) time offline algorithm for k-mismatch on a text of length n. This is a factor of k improvement over the fastest previous result of this form from SODA 2000 [9, 10]. We then give a randomised and online algorithm which runs in the same time complexity but requires only O(k2 polylog m) space in total. Next we give a randomised (1 + ∊)-approximation algorithm for the streaming k-mismatch problem which uses O(k2 polylog m/∊2) space and runs in O(polylog m/∊2) worst-case time per arriving symbol. Finally we combine our new results to derive a randomised O(k2 polylog m) space algorithm for the streaming k-mismatch problem which runs in worst-case time per arriving symbol. This improves the best previous space complexity for streaming k-mismatch from FOCS 2009 [26] by a factor of k. We also improve the time complexity of this previous result by an even greater factor to match the fastest known offline algorithm (up to logarithmic factors). Raphaël Clifford, Allyx Fontaine, Ely Porat, Benjamin Sach, Tatiana Starikovskaya |
SODA | 2 |
| 2016 | Dynamic and Approximate Pattern Matching in 2D
Raphaël Clifford, Allyx Fontaine, Tatiana Starikovskaya, Hjalte Wedel Vildhøj |
SPIRE | 2 |
| 2015 | Dictionary Matching in a Stream
Raphaël Clifford, Allyx Fontaine, Ely Porat, Benjamin Sach, Tatiana Starikovskaya |
ESA | 2 |
| 2014 | On Lower Bounds for the Time and the Bit Complexity of Some Probabilistic Distributed Graph Algorithms - (Extended Abstract)
Allyx Fontaine, Yves Métivier, John Michael Robson, Akka Zemmari |
SOFSEM | 1 |
| 2013 | Optimal bit complexity randomised distributed MIS and maximal matching algorithms for anonymous rings
Allyx Fontaine, Yves Métivier, John Michael Robson, Akka Zemmari |
Inf. Comput. | 1 |