Demo Data from SIGIR 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Apoorve Chokshi
dblp:139/8796
· DBLP profile ↗
1ranked-venue papers
0as first author
0since 2021 · last 2015
—ORCID · unresolved
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Human-computer interaction and ubiquitous computing · 1
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Human-computer interaction and pervasive computing
1 paper |
Collaborative and social computing · 33% Usability and user experience research · 33% Human-AI interaction · 33% |
Topics — the 3 heaviest of 3, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Human-AI interaction › algorithmic decision-making
algorithmic curation |
0.2 | 1 | 2015 | News Feed: What's in it for Me? · CHI 2015 |
Collaborative and social computing › social media
social network sites |
0.2 | 1 | 2015 | News Feed: What's in it for Me? · CHI 2015 |
Usability and user experience research
user perception |
0.2 | 1 | 2015 | News Feed: What's in it for Me? · CHI 2015 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
think-aloud interviews · 0.2qualitative study · 0.2
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2015 | News Feed: What's in it for Me?abstractOver a billion people use social networking sites like Facebook to maintain awareness of their friends. Facebook's News Feed is the primary mechanism by which people are shown updates about their friends' daily activities on the site in the form of an algorithmically curated list of stories. This paper examines how people browse the News Feed, their perceptions and satisfaction while using it, and the interactions they make with their personal social network. We conducted a qualitative study involving think-aloud semi-structured interviews as the participants casually browsed their own feeds. We observed a wide variation in the use of the News Feed ranging from careful consideration of social conventions, judgment of people, and annoyance and frustration towards certain friends. Our findings suggest that people do not deliberately curate their own News Feed either due to lack of awareness or perceived social repercussions. Paul Lapides, Apoorve Chokshi, Sheelagh Carpendale, Saul Greenberg |
CHI | 2 |