Demo Data from SIGIR 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Debra C. Gash
dblp:14/4660
· DBLP profile ↗
1ranked-venue papers
0as first author
0since 2021 · last 1994
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Databases, data management, data science and information retrieval · 1
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Human-computer interaction and pervasive computing
1 paper |
Collaborative and social computing · 100% |
Topics — the 2 heaviest of 2, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Collaborative and social computing
computer-supported cooperative work |
0.0 | 1 | 1994 | Technological Frames: Making Sense of Information Technology in Organizations · ACM Trans. Inf. Syst. 1994 |
Collaborative and social computing › socio-technical systems
organizational impact of technology |
0.0 | 1 | 1994 | Technological Frames: Making Sense of Information Technology in Organizations · ACM Trans. Inf. Syst. 1994 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
qualitative analysis · 0.0empirical study · 0.0
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1994 | Technological Frames: Making Sense of Information Technology in OrganizationsabstractIn this article, we build on and extend research into the cognitions and values of users and designers by proposing a systematic approach for examining the underlying assumptions, expectations, and knowledge that people have about technology. Such interpretations of technology (which we call technological frames) are central to understanding technological development, use, and change in organizations. We suggest that where the technological frames of key groups in organizations—such as managers, technologists, and users— are significantly different, difficulties and conflict around the development, use, and change of technology may result. We use the findings of an empirical study to illustrate how the nature, value, and use of a groupware technology were interpreted by various organizational stakeholders, resulting in outcomes that deviated from those expected. We argue that technological frames offer an interesting and useful analytic perspective for explaining an anticipating actions and meanings that are not easily obtained with other theoretical lenses. Wanda J. Orlikowski, Debra C. Gash |
ACM Trans. Inf. Syst. | 2 |