Teleoperation systems are increasingly used in remote inspection and maintenance, especially in safety-critical settings. This paper presents findings from a lab study examining user interaction with a teleoperation for airport safety inspection. The study investigates five visual interface configurations: First Person View (FPV), Third Person View (TPV), Augmented FPV, FPV+TPV, and Augmented FPV+TPV. Eighteen participants completed inspection tasks under each condition and rated interface helpfulness, workload (NASA-TLX), and simulator sickness. The result was confirmed by bootstrapping with 1000 iterations. Results showed that all view configurations were rated more helpful than TPV alone, with FPV-based combinations improving depth perception and spatial understanding. NASA-TLX revealed cognitive effort, while SSQ scores decreased post-task, particularly in oculomotor symptoms, suggesting adaptation. These findings support continued research into optimising visual interfaces for teleoperation in safety-critical settings.

Abstract The International Football Association Board decided to introduce Video Assistant Referee (VAR) in 2018. This led to the need to develop methods for quality control of the VAR-systems. This article focuses on the important aspect to evaluate the video quality. Video Quality assessment has matured in the sense that there are standardized, commercial products and established open-source solutions to measure it with objective methods. Previous research has primarily focused on the end-user quality assessment. How to assess the video in the contribution phase of the chain is less studied. The novelties of this study are two-fold: 1) The user study is specifically targeting video experts i.e., to assess the perceived quality of video professionals working with video production. 2) Six video quality models have been independently benchmarked against the user data and evaluated to show which of the models could provide the best predictions of perceived quality. The independent evaluation is important to get unbiased results as shown by the Video Quality Experts Group. An experiment was performed involving 25 video experts in which they rated the perceived quality. The video formats tested were High-Definition TV both progressive and interlaced as well as a quarters size format that was scaled down half the size in both width and height. The videos were encoded with both H.264 and Motion JPEG for the full size but only H.264 for the quarter size. Bitrates ranged from 80 Mbit/s down to 10 Mbit/s. We could see that for H.264 that the quality was overall very good but dropped somewhat for 10 Mbit/s. For Motion JPEG the quality dropped over the whole range. For the interlaced format the degradation that was based on a simple deinterlacing method did receive overall low ratings. For the quarter size three different scaling algorithms were evaluated. Lanczos performed the best and Bilinear the worst. The performance of six different video quality models were evaluated for 1080p and 1080i. The Video Quality Metric for Variable Frame Delay had the best performance for both formats, followed by Video Multimethod Assessment Fusion method and the Video Quality Metric General model.

Design considerations are considered for optical time-division multiplexing in terms of bandwidth requirements for the modulators and switches for a particular multiplexing scheme and the corresponding drive signals are derived using a time-domain approach. It is shown that these requirements are stricter than expected from simple considerations. Different types of multiplexing schemes are analyzed and are shown to behave differently due to varying chirping properties; this chirping is also calculated. A comparison to nonmultiplexed systems is made.>