Demo Data from SIGIR 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Salil Tambe
dblp:142/2576
· DBLP profile ↗
5ranked-venue papers
1as first author
0since 2021 · last 2016
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Graphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 5 · 1 first-authorArtificial intelligence and machine learning · 2 · 1 first-author
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Computer graphics and multimedia
2 papers |
Computational photography and imaging · 81% Image and video processing · 19% | |
| Artificial intelligence
1 paper |
Face, body and person analysis · 87% Trustworthy machine learning · 13% |
Topics — the 7 heaviest of 8, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Computer vision › Face, body and person analysis
face alignment |
0.2 | 1 | 2016 | Robust Face Alignment Using a Mixture of Invariant Experts · ECCV (5) 2016 |
Computer vision › Face, body and person analysis › face alignment
robust face alignment |
0.2 | 1 | 2016 | Robust Face Alignment Using a Mixture of Invariant Experts · ECCV (5) 2016 |
Computational photography and imaging › light field imaging
light field photography |
0.2 | 1 | 2014 | Compressive epsilon photography for post-capture control in digital imaging · ACM Trans. Graph. 2014 |
Image and video processing
image reconstruction |
0.2 | 1 | 2013 | Towards Motion Aware Light Field Video for Dynamic Scenes · ICCV 2013 |
Computational photography and imaging
light field imaging |
0.2 | 1 | 2013 | Towards Motion Aware Light Field Video for Dynamic Scenes · ICCV 2013 |
Computational photography and imaging › light field imaging
light field video |
0.2 | 1 | 2013 | Towards Motion Aware Light Field Video for Dynamic Scenes · ICCV 2013 |
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning
robustness |
0.1 | 1 | 2016 | Robust Face Alignment Using a Mixture of Invariant Experts · ECCV (5) 2016 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
mixture of invariant experts · 0.2image reconstruction · 0.2greedy sampling · 0.2gaussian mixture model · 0.2sparse representation · 0.2multiplexing matrices · 0.2dictionary learning · 0.2
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2016 | Robust Face Alignment Using a Mixture of Invariant Experts
Oncel Tuzel, Tim K. Marks, Salil Tambe |
ECCV (5) | 3 |
| 2014 | The radon image as plenoptic functionabstractWe introduce a novel plenoptic function that can be directly captured or generated after the fact in plenoptic cameras. Whereas previous approaches represent the plenoptic function over a 4D ray space (as radiance or light field), we introduce the representation of the plenoptic function over a 3D plane space. Our approach uses the Radon plenoptic function instead of the traditional 4D plenoptic function to achieve 3D representation - which promises reduced size, making it suitable for use in mobile devices. Moreover, we show that the original 3D luminous density of the scene can be recovered via the inverse Radon transform. Finally, we demonstrate how various 3D views and differently-focused pictures can be rendered directly from this new representation. Todor G. Georgiev, Salil Tambe, Andrew Lumsdaine, Jennifer Gille, Ashok Veeraraghavan |
ICIP | 2 |
| 2014 | Compressive epsilon photography for post-capture control in digital imagingabstractA traditional camera requires the photographer to select the many parameters at capture time. While advances in light field photography have enabled post-capture control of focus and perspective, they suffer from several limitations including lower spatial resolution, need for hardware modifications, and restrictive choice of aperture and focus setting. In this paper, we propose "compressive epsilon photography," a technique for achieving complete post-capture control of focus and aperture in a traditional camera by acquiring a carefully selected set of 8 to 16 images and computationally reconstructing images corresponding to all other focus-aperture settings. We make the following contributions: first, we learn the statistical redundancies in focal-aperture stacks using a Gaussian Mixture Model; second, we derive a greedy sampling strategy for selecting the best focus-aperture settings; and third, we develop an algorithm for reconstructing the entire focal-aperture stack from a few captured images. As a consequence, only a burst of images with carefully selected camera settings are acquired. Post-capture, the user can then select any focal-aperture setting of choice and the corresponding image can be rendered using our algorithm. We show extensive results on several real data sets. Atsushi Ito, Salil Tambe, Kaushik Mitra, Aswin C. Sankaranarayanan, Ashok Veeraraghavan |
ACM Trans. Graph. | 2 |
| 2013 | Towards Motion Aware Light Field Video for Dynamic ScenesabstractCurrent Light Field (LF) cameras offer fixed resolution in space, time and angle which is decided a-priori and is independent of the scene. These cameras either trade-off spatial resolution to capture single-shot LF or tradeoff temporal resolution by assuming a static scene to capture high spatial resolution LF. Thus, capturing high spatial resolution LF video for dynamic scenes remains an open and challenging problem. We present the concept, design and implementation of a LF video camera that allows capturing high resolution LF video. The spatial, angular and temporal resolution are not fixed a-priori and we exploit the scene-specific redundancy in space, time and angle. Our reconstruction is motion-aware and offers a continuum of resolution tradeoff with increasing motion in the scene. The key idea is (a) to design efficient multiplexing matrices that allow resolution tradeoffs, (b) use dictionary learning and sparse representations for robust reconstruction, and (c) perform local motion-aware adaptive reconstruction. We perform extensive analysis and characterize the performance of our motion-aware reconstruction algorithm. We show realistic simulations using a graphics simulator as well as real results using a LCoS based programmable camera. We demonstrate novel results such as high resolution digital refocusing for dynamic moving objects. Salil Tambe, Ashok Veeraraghavan, Amit K. Agrawal |
ICCV | 1 |
| 2012 | Flutter Shutter Video Camera for compressive sensing of videosabstractVideo cameras are invariably bandwidth limited and this results in a trade-off between spatial and temporal resolution. Advances in sensor manufacturing technology have tremendously increased the available spatial resolution of modern cameras while simultaneously lowering the costs of these sensors. In stark contrast, hardware improvements in temporal resolution have been modest. One solution to enhance temporal resolution is to use high bandwidth imaging devices such as high speed sensors and camera arrays. Unfortunately, these solutions are expensive. An alternate solution is motivated by recent advances in computational imaging and compressive sensing. Camera designs based on these principles, typically, modulate the incoming video using spatio-temporal light modulators and capture the modulated video at a lower bandwidth. Reconstruction algorithms, motivated by compressive sensing, are subsequently used to recover the high bandwidth video at high fidelity. Though promising, these methods have been limited since they require complex and expensive light modulators that make the techniques difficult to realize in practice. In this paper, we show that a simple coded exposure modulation is sufficient to reconstruct high speed videos. We propose the Flutter Shutter Video Camera (FSVC) in which each exposure of the sensor is temporally coded using an independent pseudo-random sequence. Such exposure coding is easily achieved in modern sensors and is already a feature of several machine vision cameras. We also develop two algorithms for reconstructing the high speed video; the first based on minimizing the total variation of the spatio-temporal slices of the video and the second based on a data driven dictionary based approximation. We perform evaluation on simulated videos and real data to illustrate the robustness of our system. Jason Holloway, Aswin C. Sankaranarayanan, Ashok Veeraraghavan, Salil Tambe |
ICCP | 4 |