Demo Data from SIGIR 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Gitte Rasmussen
dblp:142/3158
· DBLP profile ↗
4ranked-venue papers
0as first author
1since 2021 · last 2025
0000-0002-2940-0839ORCID · corroborated
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Human-computer interaction and ubiquitous computing · 4 · 1 since 2021Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 3Applied, interdisciplinary, general and emerging computing · 1
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Human-computer interaction and pervasive computing
3 papers |
Health and well-being technologies · 57% Human-robot interaction · 19% Interaction techniques and input · 12% | |
| Artificial intelligence
1 paper |
Robot manipulation · 100% |
Topics — the 5 heaviest of 7, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Health and well-being technologies › rehabilitation technology › rehabilitation robotics
gait rehabilitation |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Oh no! She is Flying! Interaction Analysis of Therapist-Robot Collaboration in Gait Rehabilitation · Int. J. Hum. Comput. Stud. 2025 |
Health and well-being technologies › rehabilitation technology
rehabilitation robotics |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Oh no! She is Flying! Interaction Analysis of Therapist-Robot Collaboration in Gait Rehabilitation · Int. J. Hum. Comput. Stud. 2025 |
Human-robot interaction
physical human-robot interaction |
0.6 | 2 | 2019 | Bodily Human Robot Interaction · HRI 2019 Kinesthetic human/robot coordination: the coordination of movements for interaction · HRI 2014 |
Interaction techniques and input › post-WIMP interaction › embodied interaction
bodily interaction |
0.4 | 1 | 2019 | Bodily Human Robot Interaction · HRI 2019 |
User interface design and tools
end-user development |
0.3 | 1 | 2025 | Oh no! She is Flying! Interaction Analysis of Therapist-Robot Collaboration in Gait Rehabilitation · Int. J. Hum. Comput. Stud. 2025 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
interaction analysis · 0.9ethnomethodology · 0.9conversation analysis · 0.9qualitative study · 0.4
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | Oh no! She is Flying! Interaction Analysis of Therapist-Robot Collaboration in Gait RehabilitationabstractStrokes are a leading cause of disability, with many survivors experiencing significant mobility impairments. While robot-assisted rehabilitation offers a promising solution, its adoption seems challenged by high upfront costs, low flexibility and complex configuration workflows. To address these challenges, this study conducts an interaction analysis to identify key requirements for empowering therapists to self-configure and adapt a flexible, cost-effective robot during gait rehabilitation tasks. Our analysis is based on 20 training sequences from a 60-hour video dataset collected across three experimental setups, involving young adults with motor impairments training with the assistance of the robot. Drawing methods from Ethnomethodology and Conversation Analysis (EMCA), we examined the sequential organization of actions between technology, therapist and participant, identifying three main stages: setup, training, and completion. During setup, coordinated actions prepare the participant and the robot for the main training task; during training, participant and robot engage in movement while the therapist iterates adjustments; and in completion, coordinated actions prepare the participant for transitioning back to their conventional support system. Our analysis highlights some requirements and strategies for developing End-User Development (EUD) environments for robot-assisted physiotherapy, emphasizing user-driven workflows, multimodal transitions between robot’s assistance modes, and real-time robotic feedback that maintains coherence with therapists’ practices. • Robot-assisted physical training follows a structured sequence with 3 main phases. • The gaze, speech, and touch of the therapists indicate transitions between phases. • Robot control modes adapt across phases to support evolving therapeutic goals. • Software engagement varies with each phase of therapy and the patient’s condition. • Therapists can adjust assistance settings before, during, and after active therapy. Jose Pablo De la Rosa Gutierrez, Thiago Rocha Silva, Anders Stengaard Sørensen, Gitte Rasmussen |
Int. J. Hum. Comput. Stud. | 4 |
| 2019 | Bodily Human Robot InteractionabstractThis workshop is dedicated to discuss and explore the specific interdisciplinary aspects of Bodily human robot interaction, and establish a common ground for this area as a recognized and continued research topic. Bodily interaction with robots and robotic devices is partially established in niche applications such as exoskeletons, assistive devices and advanced machines for physical training where bodily interaction is the application. Bodily interaction is expected to develop a broader role in human robot interaction, for instance in manufacturing and in social and entertainment robotics. The direct exchange of force and motion in bodily interaction create a range of engineering challenges, but also entwine engineering directly with topics that traditionally reside in the realm of health and humanistic science, from biomechanics to human's social responses to the prompting and responses of physical interaction. Jorge Solis 0001, Anders Stengaard Sørensen, Gitte Rasmussen |
HRI | 3 |
| 2018 | RoBody Interaction A New Approach at Kinesthetic Human Robot InteractionabstractThis paper presents a novel method for analyzing and designing kinesthetic interaction between humans and robots. The method is based on a combination of Social Embodied Interaction (SEI) analysis and Finite State Machine design. The method is presented along with its application to design and analyze an interactive training program for the robotic training device RoboTrainer-Light, with the objective of programming the robot so an optimal training pattern will emerge in the interaction, using only the exchange of force and motion to achieve this. Anders Stengaard Sørensen, Gitte Rasmussen |
RO-MAN | 2 |
| 2014 | Kinesthetic human/robot coordination: the coordination of movements for interactionabstractTraining with a robotic training partner, is a physical, powerful, and yet intimate form of robot/human interaction (RHI). In this paper we report on the early stages of a project, that aims to study and use the human kinesthetic "language" of co-motion, used in physical human/robot interaction such as training. Anders Stengaard Sørensen, Gitte Rasmussen, Dennis Day |
HRI | 2 |