Demo Data from SIGIR 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Caroline Dive
dblp:142/5415
· DBLP profile ↗
3ranked-venue papers
0as first author
0since 2021 · last 2019
0000-0002-1726-8850ORCID · corroborated
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Applied, interdisciplinary, general and emerging computing · 3
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Interdisciplinary, comprehensive, and emerging computing
3 papers |
Bioinformatics and computational biology · 100% |
Topics — the 7 heaviest of 8, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Bioinformatics and computational biology
cancer genomics |
0.4 | 1 | 2019 | In silico error correction improves cfDNA mutation calling · Bioinform. 2019 |
Bioinformatics and computational biology › cancer genomics
circulating tumor DNA analysis |
0.4 | 1 | 2019 | In silico error correction improves cfDNA mutation calling · Bioinform. 2019 |
Bioinformatics and computational biology › bioimage informatics › bioimage analysis
molecule counting |
0.3 | 1 | 2017 | twoddpcr: an R/Bioconductor package and Shiny app for Droplet Digital PCR analysis · Bioinform. 2017 |
Bioinformatics and computational biology
nucleic acid quantification |
0.3 | 1 | 2017 | twoddpcr: an R/Bioconductor package and Shiny app for Droplet Digital PCR analysis · Bioinform. 2017 |
Bioinformatics and computational biology
proteomics |
0.2 | 1 | 2014 | A hierarchical statistical modeling approach to analyze proteomic isobaric tag for relative and absolute quantitation data · Bioinform. 2014 |
Bioinformatics and computational biology › proteomics
quantitative proteomics |
0.2 | 1 | 2014 | A hierarchical statistical modeling approach to analyze proteomic isobaric tag for relative and absolute quantitation data · Bioinform. 2014 |
Bioinformatics and computational biology › sequence analysis
sequencing error correction |
0.1 | 1 | 2019 | In silico error correction improves cfDNA mutation calling · Bioinform. 2019 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
redundancy-based error correction · 0.4poisson statistics · 0.3hierarchical statistical model · 0.2
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019 | In silico error correction improves cfDNA mutation callingabstractMOTIVATION: Circulating-free DNA (cfDNA) profiling by sequencing is an important minimally invasive protocol for monitoring the mutation profile of solid tumours in cancer patients. Since the concentration of available cfDNA is limited, sample library generation relies on multiple rounds of PCR amplification, during which the accumulation of errors results in reduced sensitivity and lower accuracy. RESULTS: We present PCR Error Correction (PEC), an algorithm to identify and correct errors in short read sequencing data. It exploits the redundancy that arises from multiple rounds of PCR amplification. PEC is particularly well suited to applications such as single-cell sequencing and circulating tumour DNA (ctDNA) analysis, in which many cycles of PCR are used to generate sufficient DNA for sequencing from small amounts of starting material. When applied to ctDNA analysis, PEC significantly improves mutation calling accuracy, achieving similar levels of performance to more complex strategies that require additional protocol steps and access to calibration DNA datasets. AVAILABILITY AND IMPLEMENTATION: PEC is available under the GPL-v3 Open Source licence, and is freely available from: https://github.com/CRUKMI-ComputationalBiology/PCR_Error_Correction.git. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Supplementary data are available at Bioinformatics online. Chang Sik Kim, Sumitra Mohan, Mahmood Ayub, Dominic G. Rothwell, Caroline Dive, Ged Brady, Crispin J. Miller |
Bioinform. | 5 |
| 2017 | twoddpcr: an R/Bioconductor package and Shiny app for Droplet Digital PCR analysisabstractSUMMARY: Droplet Digital PCR (ddPCR) is a sensitive platform used to quantify specific nucleic acid molecules amplified by polymerase chain reactions. Its sensitivity makes it particularly useful for the detection of rare mutant molecules, such as those present in a sample of circulating free tumour DNA obtained from cancer patients. ddPCR works by partitioning a sample into individual droplets for which the majority contain only zero or one target molecule. Each droplet then becomes a reaction chamber for PCR, which through the use of fluorochrome labelled probes allows the target molecules to be detected by measuring the fluorescence intensity of each droplet. The technology supports two channels, allowing, for example, mutant and wild type molecules to be detected simultaneously in the same sample. As yet, no open source software is available for the automatic gating of two channel ddPCR experiments in the case where the droplets can be grouped into four clusters. Here, we present an open source R package 'twoddpcr', which uses Poisson statistics to estimate the number of molecules in such two channel ddPCR data. Using the Shiny framework, an accompanying graphical user interface (GUI) is also included for the package, allowing users to adjust parameters and see the results in real-time. AVAILABILITY AND IMPLEMENTATION: twoddpcr is available from Bioconductor (3.5) at https://bioconductor.org/packages/twoddpcr/ . A Shiny-based GUI suitable for non-R users is available as a standalone application from within the package and also as a web application at http://shiny.cruk.manchester.ac.uk/twoddpcr/ . CONTACT: [email protected] or [email protected]. PACKAGE MAINTAINER: [email protected]. Anthony Chiu, Mahmood Ayub, Caroline Dive, Ged Brady, Crispin J. Miller |
Bioinform. | 3 |
| 2014 | A hierarchical statistical modeling approach to analyze proteomic isobaric tag for relative and absolute quantitation dataabstractMOTIVATION: Isobaric tag for relative and absolute quantitation (iTRAQ) is a widely used method in quantitative proteomics. A robust data analysis strategy is required to determine protein quantification reliability, i.e. changes due to biological regulation rather than technical variation, so that proteins that are differentially expressed can be identified. METHODS: Samples were created by mixing 5, 10, 15 and 20 μg Escherichia coli cell lysate with 100 μg of cell lysate from mouse, corresponding to expected relative fold changes of one for mouse proteins and from 0.25 to 4 for E.coli proteins. Relative quantification was carried out using eight channel isobaric tagging with iTRAQ reagent, and proteins were identified using a TripleTOF 5600 mass spectrometer. Technical variation inherent in this iTRAQ dataset was systematically investigated. RESULTS: A hierarchical statistical model was developed to use quantitative information at peptide level and protein level simultaneously to estimate variation present in each individual peptide and protein. A novel data analysis strategy for iTRAQ, denoted in short as WHATraq, was subsequently proposed with its performance evaluated by the proportion of E.coli proteins that are successfully identified as differentially expressed. Compared with two benchmark data analysis strategies WHATraq was able to identify at least 62.8% more true positive proteins that are differentially expressed. Further validated using a biological iTRAQ dataset including multiple biological replicates from varied murine cell lines, WHATraq performed consistently and identified 375% more proteins as being differentially expressed among different cell lines than the other data analysis strategies. Michael J. Walker, Andrew J. K. Williamson, Andrew Pierce, Carlo Berzuini, Caroline Dive, Anthony D. Whetton |
Bioinform. | 6 |