Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Jessica Ficler

dblp:143/3559 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
4ranked-venue papers
2as first author
0since 2021 · last 2016
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 2 · 2 first-authorGraphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 1Theory of computation · 1

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Artificial intelligence
2 papers
Information extraction and text analysis · 100%

Topics — the 2 heaviest of 2, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Natural language and speech › Information extraction and text analysis
syntactic parsing
0.322016
A Neural Network for Coordination Boundary Prediction · EMNLP 2016
Coordination Annotation Extension in the Penn Tree Bank · ACL (1) 2016
Natural language and speech › Information extraction and text analysis › data annotation › corpus annotation
syntactic annotation
0.212016
Coordination Annotation Extension in the Penn Tree Bank · ACL (1) 2016

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

neural network · 0.2manual annotation · 0.2LSTM · 0.2
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2016 Coordination Annotation Extension in the Penn Tree Bank
abstract
Coordination is an important and common syntactic construction which is not handled well by state of the art parsers.Coordinations in the Penn Treebank are missing internal structure in many cases, do not include explicit marking of the conjuncts and contain various errors and inconsistencies.In this work, we initiated manual annotation process for solving these issues.We identify the different elements in a coordination phrase and label each element with its function.We add phrase boundaries when these are missing, unify inconsistencies, and fix errors.The outcome is an extension of the PTB that includes consistent and detailed structures for coordinations.We make the coordination annotation publicly available, in hope that they will facilitate further research into coordination disambiguation. 1
Jessica Ficler, Yoav Goldberg
ACL (1)1
2016 A Neural Network for Coordination Boundary Prediction
abstract
We propose a neural-network based model for coordination boundary prediction. The network is designed to incorporate two signals: the similarity between conjuncts and the observation that replacing the whole coordination phrase with a conjunct tends to produce a coherent sentences. The modeling makes use of several LSTM networks. The model is trained solely on conjunction annotations in a Treebank, without using external resources. We show improvements on predicting coordination boundaries on the PTB compared to two state-of-the-art parsers; as well as improvement over previous coordination boundary prediction systems on the Genia corpus.
Jessica Ficler, Yoav Goldberg
EMNLP1
2014 On the Efficiency of the Hamming C-Centerstring Problems
Amihood Amir, Jessica Ficler, Liam Roditty, Oren Sar Shalom
CPM2
2014 Multiply Balanced k -Partitioning
Amihood Amir, Jessica Ficler, Robert Krauthgamer, Liam Roditty, Oren Sar Shalom
LATIN2