Demo Data from SIGIR 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Jacob B. Madsen
dblp:143/4646
· DBLP profile ↗
1ranked-venue papers
1as first author
0since 2021 · last 2016
—ORCID · unresolved
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Graphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 1 · 1 first-author
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Human-computer interaction and pervasive computing
1 paper |
Immersive interaction · 50% User interface design and tools · 50% | |
| Computer graphics and multimedia
1 paper |
Visualization and visual analytics · 100% |
Topics — the 2 heaviest of 3, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Immersive interaction › augmented reality
augmented reality annotation |
0.2 | 1 | 2016 | Temporal Coherence Strategies for Augmented Reality Labeling · IEEE Trans. Vis. Comput. Graph. 2016 |
User interface design and tools › visualization
view management |
0.2 | 1 | 2016 | Temporal Coherence Strategies for Augmented Reality Labeling · IEEE Trans. Vis. Comput. Graph. 2016 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
subjective evaluation · 0.5empirical evaluation · 0.5
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2016 | Temporal Coherence Strategies for Augmented Reality LabelingabstractTemporal coherence of annotations is an important factor in augmented reality user interfaces and for information visualization. In this paper, we empirically evaluate four different techniques for annotation. Based on these findings, we follow up with subjective evaluations in a second experiment. Results show that presenting annotations in object space or image space leads to a significant difference in task performance. Furthermore, there is a significant interaction between rendering space and update frequency of annotations. Participants improve significantly in locating annotations, when annotations are presented in object space, and view management update rate is limited. In a follow-up experiment, participants appear to be more satisfied with limited update rate in comparison to a continuous update rate of the view management system. Jacob B. Madsen, Markus Tatzgern, Claus B. Madsen, Dieter Schmalstieg, Denis Kalkofen |
IEEE Trans. Vis. Comput. Graph. | 1 |