Demo Data from SIGIR 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Barbara Grimpe
dblp:144/5299
· DBLP profile ↗
1ranked-venue papers
1as first author
0since 2021 · last 2014
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Human-computer interaction and ubiquitous computing · 1 · 1 first-author
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Human-computer interaction and pervasive computing
1 paper |
Design research and methods · 100% |
Topics — the 2 heaviest of 2, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Design research and methods
responsible design |
0.2 | 1 | 2014 | Towards a closer dialogue between policy and practice: responsible design in HCI · CHI 2014 |
Design research and methods
design ethics |
0.1 | 1 | 2014 | Towards a closer dialogue between policy and practice: responsible design in HCI · CHI 2014 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
conceptual analysis · 0.2
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2014 | Towards a closer dialogue between policy and practice: responsible design in HCIabstractGiven the potent and pervasive nature of modern technologies, this paper lays out the complexities involved in achieving responsible design. In order to do this we will first compare an emerging policy-oriented programme of research known as RRI (Responsible Research and Innovation) with initiatives in HCI. A focus on the similarities and differences may highlight to what extent responsibility is already and successfully embedded within the concerns and practices of design and use, and what may yet need to be incorporated for responsible design. The paper then discusses the challenges of 'naturalising' the very ambitious programme of RRI within specific design activities and concerns, through the lens of four analytic concepts: reflexivity; responsiveness; inclusion; and anticipation. Finally, we make a case for a pragmatic, 'unromantic', but engaged reinterpretation of RRI for HCI. Barbara Grimpe, Mark Hartswood, Marina Jirotka |
CHI | 1 |