Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

João Felipe S. Ouriques

dblp:144/8260 · also João Felipe Silva Ouriques · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
3ranked-venue papers
2as first author
0since 2021 · last 2019
0000-0002-5991-0004ORCID · corroborated

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Software engineering, systems software and programming languages · 3 · 2 first-author

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Software engineering, system software, and programming languages
1 paper
Software testing · 100%

Topics — the 3 heaviest of 3, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Software testing
model-based testing
0.212015
Strategies for Prioritizing Test Cases Generated Through Model-Based Testing Approaches · ICSE (2) 2015
Software testing › regression testing
test case prioritization
0.212015
Strategies for Prioritizing Test Cases Generated Through Model-Based Testing Approaches · ICSE (2) 2015
Software testing › regression testing
test suite reduction
0.112015
Strategies for Prioritizing Test Cases Generated Through Model-Based Testing Approaches · ICSE (2) 2015
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2019 A Method to Evaluate Knowledge Resources in Agile Software Development
abstract
Background: Organizations adopting Agile Software Development (ASD) use different Knowledge Management (KM) practices to retain and share knowledge. However, it is often the case that knowledge retention is carried out in an ad-hoc way. Aims: In this study, we report our experience from proposing the Knowledge Critically Evaluation Method (KCEM) to evaluate knowledge items (KIT). Our main goal with KCEMs is to support companies to systematically retain knowledge in ASD contexts. Method: We conducted an improvement case study to develop and evaluate KCEM. This research follows the guidelines for technology transfer between industry and academia. The case and unit of analysis is Ericsson, a Swedish company that develops telecommunication solutions. Results: In this paper, we provide initial results of both lab and static validation, enriched by the lessons learned. Conclusions: The preliminary results show that KCEM is easy to understand and use, provides a different perspective on the KIT by visualizing in the criticality chart, and reduces the level of abstraction associated to a knowledge subject area.
Raquel Andrade Barros Ouriques, Ricardo Britto 0001, Krzysztof Wnuk, João Felipe S. Ouriques, Tony Gorschek
ESEM4
2018 Test case prioritization techniques for model-based testing: a replicated study
João Felipe S. Ouriques, Emanuela Gadelha Cartaxo, Patrícia Duarte de Lima Machado
Softw. Qual. J.1
2015 Strategies for Prioritizing Test Cases Generated Through Model-Based Testing Approaches
abstract
Software testing is expensive and time consuming,especially for complex software. In order to deal with the costof testing, researchers develop Model-Based Testing (MBT). InMBT, test cases are generated automatically and a drawback isa huge generated test suite. Our research aims at studying the Test Case Prioritization problem in MBT context. So far, we already evaluated the influence of the model structure and the characteristics of the test cases that fail. Results suggest that the former does not affect significantly the performance of techniques, however, the latter indeed represents a major impact. Therefore, a worthy information in this context might be an expert who knows the crucial parts of the software, thus we propose the first version of a prioritization technique that considers hints from the expert and the distance notion in order to prioritize test cases. Evaluation and tuning of the technique are ongoing, but preliminary evaluation reveals promising results.
João Felipe S. Ouriques
ICSE (2)1