Demo Data from SIGIR 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Jonas Wagner
dblp:145/5117
· DBLP profile ↗
3ranked-venue papers
2as first author
0since 2021 · last 2020
—ORCID · conflict
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Security and privacy · 1 · 1 first-authorSoftware engineering, systems software and programming languages · 1 · 1 first-authorApplied, interdisciplinary, general and emerging computing · 1
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Network and information security
1 paper |
Systems and software security · 67% Blockchain and cryptocurrency security · 33% | |
| Computer architecture, parallel and distributed computing, and storage systems
1 paper |
Performance modeling and evaluation · 100% |
Topics — the 4 heaviest of 4, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Systems and software security
memory safety |
0.2 | 1 | 2015 | High System-Code Security with Low Overhead · IEEE Symposium on Security and Privacy 2015 |
Systems and software security › security policy enforcement
runtime enforcement |
0.2 | 1 | 2015 | High System-Code Security with Low Overhead · IEEE Symposium on Security and Privacy 2015 |
Blockchain and cryptocurrency security
runtime verification |
0.2 | 1 | 2015 | High System-Code Security with Low Overhead · IEEE Symposium on Security and Privacy 2015 |
Performance modeling and evaluation
benchmarking |
0.1 | 1 | 2015 | High System-Code Security with Low Overhead · IEEE Symposium on Security and Privacy 2015 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
security-performance tradeoff optimization · 0.4program instrumentation · 0.4
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020 | oposSOM-Browser: an interactive tool to explore omics data landscapes in health scienceabstractBACKGROUND: oposSOM is a comprehensive, machine learning based open-source data analysis software combining functionalities such as diversity analyses, biomarker selection, function mining, and visualization. RESULTS: These functionalities are now available as interactive web-browser application for a broader user audience interested in extracting detailed information from high-throughput omics data sets pre-processed by oposSOM. It enables interactive browsing of single-gene and gene set profiles, of molecular 'portrait landscapes', of associated phenotype diversity, and signalling pathway activation patterns. CONCLUSION: The oposSOM-Browser makes available interactive data browsing for five transcriptome data sets of cancer (melanomas, B-cell lymphomas, gliomas) and of peripheral blood (sepsis and healthy individuals) at www.izbi.uni-leipzig.de/opossom-browser . Henry Löffler-Wirth, Jasmin Reikowski, Siras Hakobyan, Jonas Wagner, Hans Binder |
BMC Bioinform. | 4 |
| 2015 | High System-Code Security with Low OverheadabstractSecurity vulnerabilities plague modern systems because writing secure systems code is hard. Promising approaches can retrofit security automatically via runtime checks that implement the desired security policy, these checks guard critical operations, like memory accesses. Alas, the induced slowdown usually exceeds by a wide margin what system users are willing to tolerate in production, so these tools are hardly ever used. As a result, the insecurity of real-world systems persists. We present an approach in which developers/operators can specify what level of overhead they find acceptable for a given workload (e.g., 5%), our proposed tool ASAP then automatically instruments the program to maximize its security while staying within the specified "overhead budget." Two insights make this approach effective: most overhead in existing tools is due to only a few "hot" checks, whereas the checks most useful to security are typically "cold" and cheap. We evaluate ASAP on programs from the Phoronix and SPEC benchmark suites. It can precisely select the best points in the security-performance spectrum. Moreover, we analyzed existing bugs and security vulnerabilities in RIPE, Open SSL, and the Python interpreter, and found that the protection level offered by the ASAP approach is sufficient to protect against all of them. Jonas Wagner, Volodymyr Kuznetsov, George Candea, Johannes Kinder |
IEEE Symposium on Security and Privacy | 1 |
| 2013 | -OVERIFY: Optimizing Programs for Fast Verification
Jonas Wagner, Volodymyr Kuznetsov, George Candea |
HotOS | 1 |