Demo Data from SIGIR 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Hugh J. French
dblp:145/5261
· DBLP profile ↗
2ranked-venue papers
0as first author
0since 2021 · last 2019
0000-0001-7464-6929ORCID · corroborated
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Applied, interdisciplinary, general and emerging computing · 2
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Interdisciplinary, comprehensive, and emerging computing
2 papers |
Bioinformatics and computational biology · 100% | |
| Computer architecture, parallel and distributed computing, and storage systems
1 paper |
High-performance computing · 100% |
Topics — the 3 heaviest of 3, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Bioinformatics and computational biology
genomics |
0.4 | 1 | 2019 | Evaluation of cross-platform and interlaboratory concordance via consensus modelling of genomic measurements · Bioinform. 2019 |
Bioinformatics and computational biology › genomics
next-generation sequencing data analysis |
0.2 | 1 | 2014 | NGSANE: a lightweight production informatics framework for high-throughput data analysis · Bioinform. 2014 |
High-performance computing
scientific computing systems |
0.1 | 1 | 2014 | NGSANE: a lightweight production informatics framework for high-throughput data analysis · Bioinform. 2014 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
row-linear model · 0.4consensus modelling · 0.4ASTM Standard E691 · 0.4shell scripting · 0.4modular pipeline design · 0.4
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019 | Evaluation of cross-platform and interlaboratory concordance via consensus modelling of genomic measurementsabstractMOTIVATION: A synoptic view of the human genome benefits chiefly from the application of nucleic acid sequencing and microarray technologies. These platforms allow interrogation of patterns such as gene expression and DNA methylation at the vast majority of canonical loci, allowing granular insights and opportunities for validation of original findings. However, problems arise when validating against a "gold standard" measurement, since this immediately biases all subsequent measurements towards that particular technology or protocol. Since all genomic measurements are estimates, in the absence of a "gold standard" we instead empirically assess the measurement precision and sensitivity of a large suite of genomic technologies via a consensus modelling method called the row-linear model. This method is an application of the American Society for Testing and Materials Standard E691 for assessing interlaboratory precision and sources of variability across multiple testing sites. Both cross-platform and cross-locus comparisons can be made across all common loci, allowing identification of technology- and locus-specific tendencies. RESULTS: We assess technologies including the Infinium MethylationEPIC BeadChip, whole genome bisulfite sequencing (WGBS), two different RNA-Seq protocols (PolyA+ and Ribo-Zero) and five different gene expression array platforms. Each technology thus is characterised herein, relative to the consensus. We showcase a number of applications of the row-linear model, including correlation with known interfering traits. We demonstrate a clear effect of cross-hybridisation on the sensitivity of Infinium methylation arrays. Additionally, we perform a true interlaboratory test on a set of samples interrogated on the same platform across twenty-one separate testing laboratories. AVAILABILITY AND IMPLEMENTATION: A full implementation of the row-linear model, plus extra functions for visualisation, are found in the R package consensus at https://github.com/timpeters82/consensus. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Supplementary data are available at Bioinformatics online. Timothy J. Peters, Hugh J. French, Stephen T. Bradford, Ruth Pidsley, Clare Stirzaker, Hilal Varinli, Shalima Nair, Wenjia Qu, Jenny Song, Katherine A. Giles, Aaron L. Statham, Helen Speirs, Terence P. Speed, Susan J. Clark |
Bioinform. | 2 |
| 2014 | NGSANE: a lightweight production informatics framework for high-throughput data analysisabstractSUMMARY: The initial steps in the analysis of next-generation sequencing data can be automated by way of software 'pipelines'. However, individual components depreciate rapidly because of the evolving technology and analysis methods, often rendering entire versions of production informatics pipelines obsolete. Constructing pipelines from Linux bash commands enables the use of hot swappable modular components as opposed to the more rigid program call wrapping by higher level languages, as implemented in comparable published pipelining systems. Here we present Next Generation Sequencing ANalysis for Enterprises (NGSANE), a Linux-based, high-performance-computing-enabled framework that minimizes overhead for set up and processing of new projects, yet maintains full flexibility of custom scripting when processing raw sequence data. AVAILABILITY AND IMPLEMENTATION: Ngsane is implemented in bash and publicly available under BSD (3-Clause) licence via GitHub at https://github.com/BauerLab/ngsane. CONTACT: [email protected] SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Supplementary data are available at Bioinformatics online. Fabian A. Buske, Hugh J. French, Martin A. Smith, Susan J. Clark, Denis C. Bauer |
Bioinform. | 2 |