Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Cristina Andres-Lacueva

dblp:146/3080 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
5ranked-venue papers
0as first author
2since 2021 · last 2021
0000-0002-8494-4978ORCID · reported

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Applied, interdisciplinary, general and emerging computing · 5 · 2 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Interdisciplinary, comprehensive, and emerging computing
3 papers
Bioinformatics and computational biology · 100%

Topics — the 3 heaviest of 4, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Bioinformatics and computational biology
metabolomics
0.422014
Intensity drift removal in LC/MS metabolomics by common variance compensation · Bioinform. 2014
An R package to analyse LC/MS metabolomic data: MAIT (Metabolite Automatic Identification Toolkit) · Bioinform. 2014
Bioinformatics and computational biology › metabolomics
metabolite identification
0.212014
An R package to analyse LC/MS metabolomic data: MAIT (Metabolite Automatic Identification Toolkit) · Bioinform. 2014
Bioinformatics and computational biology
liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry
0.122014
Intensity drift removal in LC/MS metabolomics by common variance compensation · Bioinform. 2014
An R package to analyse LC/MS metabolomic data: MAIT (Metabolite Automatic Identification Toolkit) · Bioinform. 2014

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

ontology-based enrichment · 0.5statistical analysis · 0.2peak annotation · 0.2data normalization · 0.2common variance analysis · 0.2
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2021 The fobitools framework: the first steps towards food enrichment analysis
Pol Castellano-Escuder, Cristina Andres-Lacueva, Alex Sánchez-Pla
Bioinform.2
2021 POMAShiny: A user-friendly web-based workflow for metabolomics and proteomics data analysis
abstract
Metabolomics and proteomics, like other omics domains, usually face a data mining challenge in providing an understandable output to advance in biomarker discovery and precision medicine. Often, statistical analysis is one of the most difficult challenges and it is critical in the subsequent biological interpretation of the results. Because of this, combined with the computational programming skills needed for this type of analysis, several bioinformatic tools aimed at simplifying metabolomics and proteomics data analysis have emerged. However, sometimes the analysis is still limited to a few hidebound statistical methods and to data sets with limited flexibility. POMAShiny is a web-based tool that provides a structured, flexible and user-friendly workflow for the visualization, exploration and statistical analysis of metabolomics and proteomics data. This tool integrates several statistical methods, some of them widely used in other types of omics, and it is based on the POMA R/Bioconductor package, which increases the reproducibility and flexibility of analyses outside the web environment. POMAShiny and POMA are both freely available at https://github.com/nutrimetabolomics/POMAShiny and https://github.com/nutrimetabolomics/POMA, respectively.
Pol Castellano-Escuder, Raúl González-Domínguez, Francesc Carmona-Pontaque, Cristina Andres-Lacueva, Alex Sánchez-Pla
PLoS Comput. Biol.4
2018 Evaluation and comparison of bioinformatic tools for the enrichment analysis of metabolomics data
abstract
BACKGROUND: Bioinformatic tools for the enrichment of 'omics' datasets facilitate interpretation and understanding of data. To date few are suitable for metabolomics datasets. The main objective of this work is to give a critical overview, for the first time, of the performance of these tools. To that aim, datasets from metabolomic repositories were selected and enriched data were created. Both types of data were analysed with these tools and outputs were thoroughly examined. RESULTS: An exploratory multivariate analysis of the most used tools for the enrichment of metabolite sets, based on a non-metric multidimensional scaling (NMDS) of Jaccard's distances, was performed and mirrored their diversity. Codes (identifiers) of the metabolites of the datasets were searched in different metabolite databases (HMDB, KEGG, PubChem, ChEBI, BioCyc/HumanCyc, LipidMAPS, ChemSpider, METLIN and Recon2). The databases that presented more identifiers of the metabolites of the dataset were PubChem, followed by METLIN and ChEBI. However, these databases had duplicated entries and might present false positives. The performance of over-representation analysis (ORA) tools, including BioCyc/HumanCyc, ConsensusPathDB, IMPaLA, MBRole, MetaboAnalyst, Metabox, MetExplore, MPEA, PathVisio and Reactome and the mapping tool KEGGREST, was examined. Results were mostly consistent among tools and between real and enriched data despite the variability of the tools. Nevertheless, a few controversial results such as differences in the total number of metabolites were also found. Disease-based enrichment analyses were also assessed, but they were not found to be accurate probably due to the fact that metabolite disease sets are not up-to-date and the difficulty of predicting diseases from a list of metabolites. CONCLUSIONS: We have extensively reviewed the state-of-the-art of the available range of tools for metabolomic datasets, the completeness of metabolite databases, the performance of ORA methods and disease-based analyses. Despite the variability of the tools, they provided consistent results independent of their analytic approach. However, more work on the completeness of metabolite and pathway databases is required, which strongly affects the accuracy of enrichment analyses. Improvements will be translated into more accurate and global insights of the metabolome.
Anna Marco-Ramell, Magali Palau-Rodriguez, Ania Alay, Sara Tulipani, Mireia Urpi-Sarda, Alex Sánchez-Pla, Cristina Andres-Lacueva
BMC Bioinform.7
2014 An R package to analyse LC/MS metabolomic data: MAIT (Metabolite Automatic Identification Toolkit)
abstract
UNLABELLED: Current tools for liquid chromatography and mass spectrometry for metabolomic data cover a limited number of processing steps, whereas online tools are hard to use in a programmable fashion. This article introduces the Metabolite Automatic Identification Toolkit (MAIT) package, which makes it possible for users to perform metabolomic end-to-end liquid chromatography and mass spectrometry data analysis. MAIT is focused on improving the peak annotation stage and provides essential tools to validate statistical analysis results. MAIT generates output files with the statistical results, peak annotation and metabolite identification. AVAILABILITY AND IMPLEMENTATION: http://b2slab.upc.edu/software-and-downloads/metabolite-automatic-identification-toolkit/.
Francesc Fernández-Albert, Rafael Llorach, Cristina Andres-Lacueva, Alexandre Perera-Lluna
Bioinform.3
2014 Intensity drift removal in LC/MS metabolomics by common variance compensation
abstract
UNLABELLED: Liquid chromatography coupled to mass spectrometry (LC/MS) has become widely used in Metabolomics. Several artefacts have been identified during the acquisition step in large LC/MS metabolomics experiments, including ion suppression, carryover or changes in the sensitivity and intensity. Several sources have been pointed out as responsible for these effects. In this context, the drift effects of the peak intensity is one of the most frequent and may even constitute the main source of variance in the data, resulting in misleading statistical results when the samples are analysed. In this article, we propose the introduction of a methodology based on a common variance analysis before the data normalization to address this issue. This methodology was tested and compared with four other methods by calculating the Dunn and Silhouette indices of the quality control classes. The results showed that our proposed methodology performed better than any of the other four methods. As far as we know, this is the first time that this kind of approach has been applied in the metabolomics context. AVAILABILITY AND IMPLEMENTATION: The source code of the methods is available as the R package intCor at http://b2slab.upc.edu/software-and-downloads/intensity-drift-correction/. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Supplementary data are available at Bioinformatics online.
Francesc Fernández-Albert, Rafael Llorach, Mar Garcia-Aloy, Andrey Ziyatdinov, Cristina Andres-Lacueva, Alexandre Perera-Lluna
Bioinform.5