Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Songbai Yan

dblp:146/8180 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
7ranked-venue papers
4as first author
1since 2021 · last 2026
0009-0000-0414-7892ORCID · reported

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 6 · 4 first-author · 1 since 2021Security and privacy · 1Databases, data management, data science and information retrieval · 1 · 1 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Artificial intelligence
5 papers
Efficient and distributed learning · 31% Learning theory · 19% Vision and language · 17%
Network and information security
1 paper
Security and privacy of machine learning · 100%
Interdisciplinary, comprehensive, and emerging computing
1 paper
Computational finance and economics · 100%

Topics — the 14 heaviest of 14, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Machine learning › Efficient and distributed learning
active learning
1.242019
The Label Complexity of Active Learning from Observational Data · NeurIPS 2019
Active Learning with Logged Data · ICML 2018
Revisiting Perceptron: Efficient and Label-Optimal Learning of Halfspaces · NIPS 2017
Machine learning › Graph learning › graph neural network
fraud detection
1.012026
ALF: Advertiser Large Foundation Model for Multi-Modal Advertiser Understanding · KDD (1) 2026
Computer vision › Vision and language › vision-language model
multimodal large language model
1.012026
ALF: Advertiser Large Foundation Model for Multi-Modal Advertiser Understanding · KDD (1) 2026
Machine learning › Efficient and distributed learning › active learning
label complexity
0.622019
The Label Complexity of Active Learning from Observational Data · NeurIPS 2019
Active Learning from Imperfect Labelers · NIPS 2016
Security and privacy of machine learning
model stealing
0.412020
Exploring Connections Between Active Learning and Model Extraction · USENIX Security Symposium 2020
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning › causal machine learning
counterfactual learning
0.412019
The Label Complexity of Active Learning from Observational Data · NeurIPS 2019
Machine learning › Reinforcement learning
off-policy reinforcement learning
0.312018
Active Learning with Logged Data · ICML 2018
Computational finance and economics
online advertising
0.312026
ALF: Advertiser Large Foundation Model for Multi-Modal Advertiser Understanding · KDD (1) 2026
Machine learning › Learning theory
computational learning theory
0.312017
Revisiting Perceptron: Efficient and Label-Optimal Learning of Halfspaces · NIPS 2017
Machine learning › Learning theory › PAC learning
halfspace learning
0.312017
Revisiting Perceptron: Efficient and Label-Optimal Learning of Halfspaces · NIPS 2017
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning › robustness › robust learning
noise-tolerant learning
0.312017
Revisiting Perceptron: Efficient and Label-Optimal Learning of Halfspaces · NIPS 2017
Machine learning › Learning theory
sample complexity
0.312017
Revisiting Perceptron: Efficient and Label-Optimal Learning of Halfspaces · NIPS 2017
Machine learning › Learning theory › statistical estimation
statistical consistency
0.222019
The Label Complexity of Active Learning from Observational Data · NeurIPS 2019
Active Learning from Imperfect Labelers · NIPS 2016
Machine learning › Learning theory › computational learning theory
passive learning
0.112017
Revisiting Perceptron: Efficient and Label-Optimal Learning of Halfspaces · NIPS 2017

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

transformer · 2.0multi-task optimization · 2.0contrastive learning · 2.0active learning · 0.7importance weighting · 0.4counterfactual risk minimization · 0.4disagreement-based active learning · 0.3perceptron algorithm · 0.3abstention-aware querying · 0.2
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2026 ALF: Advertiser Large Foundation Model for Multi-Modal Advertiser Understanding
abstract
We present ALF (Advertiser Large Foundation model), a multi-modal transformer architecture for understanding advertiser behavior and intent across text, image, video, and structured data modalities. Through contrastive learning and multi-task optimization, ALF creates unified advertiser representations that capture both content and behavioral patterns. Our model achieves state-of-the-art performance on critical tasks including fraud detection, policy violation identification, and advertiser similarity matching. In production deployment, ALF demonstrates significant real-world impact by delivering simultaneous gains in both precision and recall, for instance boosting recall by over 40 percentage points on one critical policy and increasing precision to 99.8% on another. The architecture's effectiveness stems from its novel combination of multi-modal transformations, inter-sample attention mechanism, spectrally normalized projections, and calibrated probabilistic outputs.
Santosh Rajagopalan, Jonathan Vronsky, Songbai Yan, S. Alireza Golestaneh, Shubhra Chandra
KDD (1)3
2020 Exploring Connections Between Active Learning and Model Extraction
Varun Chandrasekaran, Kamalika Chaudhuri, Irene Giacomelli, Somesh Jha, Songbai Yan
USENIX Security Symposium5
2019 The Label Complexity of Active Learning from Observational Data
abstract
Counterfactual learning from observational data involves learning a classifier on an entire population based on data that is observed conditioned on a selection policy. This work considers this problem in an active setting, where the learner additionally has access to unlabeled examples and can choose to get a subset of these labeled by an oracle. Prior work on this problem uses disagreement-based active learning, along with an importance weighted loss estimator to account for counterfactuals, which leads to a high label complexity. We show how to instead incorporate a more efficient counterfactual risk minimizer into the active learning algorithm. This requires us to modify both the counterfactual risk to make it amenable to active learning, as well as the active learning process to make it amenable to the risk. We provably demonstrate that the result of this is an algorithm which is statistically consistent as well as more label-efficient than prior work.
Songbai Yan, Kamalika Chaudhuri, Tara Javidi
NeurIPS1
2018 Active Learning with Logged Data
abstract
We consider active learning with logged data, where labeled examples are drawn conditioned on a predetermined logging policy, and the goal is to learn a classifier on the entire population, not just conditioned on the logging policy. Prior work addresses this problem either when only logged data is available, or purely in a controlled random experimentation setting where the logged data is ignored. In this work, we combine both approaches to provide an algorithm that uses logged data to bootstrap and inform experimentation, thus achieving the best of both worlds. Our work is inspired by a connection between controlled random experimentation and active learning, and modifies existing disagreement-based active learning algorithms to exploit logged data.
Songbai Yan, Kamalika Chaudhuri, Tara Javidi
ICML1
2017 Revisiting Perceptron: Efficient and Label-Optimal Learning of Halfspaces
abstract
It has been a long-standing problem to efficiently learn a halfspace using as few labels as possible in the presence of noise. In this work, we propose an efficient Perceptron-based algorithm for actively learning homogeneous halfspaces under the uniform distribution over the unit sphere. Under the bounded noise condition~\cite{MN06}, where each label is flipped with probability at most $\eta < \frac 1 2$, our algorithm achieves a near-optimal label complexity of $\tilde{O}\left(\frac{d}{(1-2\eta)^2}\ln\frac{1}{\epsilon}\right)$ in time $\tilde{O}\left(\frac{d^2}{\epsilon(1-2\eta)^3}\right)$. Under the adversarial noise condition~\cite{ABL14, KLS09, KKMS08}, where at most a $\tilde \Omega(\epsilon)$ fraction of labels can be flipped, our algorithm achieves a near-optimal label complexity of $\tilde{O}\left(d\ln\frac{1}{\epsilon}\right)$ in time $\tilde{O}\left(\frac{d^2}{\epsilon}\right)$. Furthermore, we show that our active learning algorithm can be converted to an efficient passive learning algorithm that has near-optimal sample complexities with respect to $\epsilon$ and $d$.
Songbai Yan, Chicheng Zhang
NIPS1
2016 Active Learning from Imperfect Labelers
abstract
We study active learning where the labeler can not only return incorrect labels but also abstain from labeling. We consider different noise and abstention conditions of the labeler. We propose an algorithm which utilizes abstention responses, and analyze its statistical consistency and query complexity under fairly natural assumptions on the noise and abstention rate of the labeler. This algorithm is adaptive in a sense that it can automatically request less queries with a more informed or less noisy labeler. We couple our algorithm with lower bounds to show that under some technical conditions, it achieves nearly optimal query complexity.
Songbai Yan, Kamalika Chaudhuri, Tara Javidi
NIPS1
2014 Learning a generative classifier from label proportions
Songbai Yan, Liwei Wang 0001, Jufu Feng
Neurocomputing3